(d). Ontario Ombudsman Office’s Phillip (ERO,8) forged evidence, publicly made jurisdictional errors against the Ombudsman Act..

This is Canada Supreme Corrupt Officers Group who did colluded with each other, in common interest, forged evidences, documents and court documents, made the case’s false statements of the material facts, made frauds, framed up injured worker (plaintiff) for their personal gain from 2007 beginning to today…..     Details and particulars please see www. disclosedarkforce.com

www. disclosedarkforce.com                                                                   Court File No: CV-14-501847

April 19, 2014

                      Ontario Ombudsman Office ERO Phillips forged evidence in her false decision. Details, Particulars, Evidences

Ontario Ombudsman Office, Defendant (2). Address 483 Bay ST Toronto M3G2C9 ).

 

The Early Resolution Officer Phillips know clearly all process of this fraudulent case, forgery this case’s important evidence, make the case’s false statements of the material facts, make fraudulent decision against Canada Law and the Ombudsman Act.

 

The ERO Phillips had committed forgery who made a false investigation decision as a document which had been recorded in the Ombudsman file# 243042-001(WSIB), knowing it to be false, with the intent that any person should be induced, by the belief that are genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything. The staff 8. Phillips did not comply with the Law and Professional Ethics and Standard

 

                            Background

On July 6, 2011, I sent my accusation with respect to Ontario WSIB’s illegal criminal activities to Ontario Ombudsman Office according to the direction of the WSIB Fair Practices Commission. On August 3, 2011 Staff 8. Phillips called me and checked the Evidence 51 items of the Fraudulent Case filed and she had indicated to investigate this fraudulent case.

 

After eight months and 14 days, on March 20, 2012 the staff 8. Phillips informed me that their office didn’t investigate the “case”. I asked her, “Does which office investigate this fraudulent case?” she did loudly speak “Although they have made illegal criminal activities, we can’t also fire them.”

 

I had sent my accusations (6 times) to the Ontario Ombudsman from March 20, 2012 through to December 2013 with respect to his office violating Ontario Ombudsman Act 14. (1)(2) making fraudulent decision and forging key evidence, which did disclose the Ombudsman office staff 8.Phillips who did forge key important Evidence of the Case and make false statements of the Case in her fraudulent decision.

 

Fact and Evidence

  1. On July 6, 2011, I sent my accusation (Fact and Evidence 51 items) to the Ombudsman Ontario with respect to Ontario WSIB  making illegal criminal activities from 2007 beginning to today.

E-55 receipt; letter

  1. On August 3, 2011, the staff 8. Phillips called me and investigated the fraudulent case Filed.

From September 15, 2011 through to March 14, 2012, I again sent the Case’s Evidences and accusations to the staff 8. Phillips (total 11 times including 3 times inquire).

 E-56 additional letters

  1. After delay over eight months, the staff 8. Phillips informed me that Ontario Ombudsman office refused investigation this Fraudulent Case on March 20, 2012.

 

  1. On March 20, at 2:00PM, 2012, I sent my Objection by Fax to the Ontario Ombudsman and reported the staff 8. Phillips’s illegal criminal conduct. Subsequently, I sent 5 faxes (my Objections) to the Ombudsman and also to legislative assembly of Ontario. (NO any response)

 

  1. Staff 8. Phillips did make a fraudulent decision dated April 10, 2012. In this fraudulent decision, she had forged a key important Evidence dated September 28, 2007 and made the case’s false statements of the material facts for cover up personal gain between the Office and the WSIB.

 

History

Ontario WSIB Operations’s the fraudulent group has been making illegal criminal activities which had deprived my Legal Treatment Rights and Entitlement and caused my injured Cervical Spine into Permanent Aggravation. The Fraudulent Group did refuse to carry out Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008 and the WSIB Final Decision of May 7, 2010.

 

The WSIB fraudulent group members, who are the WSIB staff 2. Reis, staff 3 Darwin, staff 1. Dicarlo, staff 4. Badovinac, had made N times illegal criminal activities, N times false documents and false Medical History Record to the Claim File record. Supporters of this Fraudulent Group are Staff 5. Locke, Staff 6. Johnson, Staff 7. Gilkinson and Ontario Ombudsman Office Staff 8. Phillips and Ontario Ombudsman Office Staff 9 Dobi.

 

The WSIB fraudulent group had made N times illegal criminal activities and refused to carry out Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008 and deprived my entitlement and legal treatment rights, which had caused my injured cervical spine into permanent aggravation.

 

Ontario Ombudsman office did violate Ontario Ombudsman Act 14. (1) (2)

Ontario Ombudsman Act

Function of Ombudsman

  1. (1) The function of ombudsman is to investigate any decision or recommendation made or any act done or omitted in the course of the administration of a governmental organization and affecting any person or body of persons in his, her or its personal capacity. R.S.O. 1990, c, O. 6, s. 14 (1).

 

Investigation on complaint.

(2) The Ombudsman may made any such investigation on a complaint made to him or her by any person affected or by any member of the Assembly to whom a complaint is made by any person affected, or of the Ombudsman’s own motion. R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 6, s. 14 (2)

 

  1. The Ombudsman office staff 8. Phillips and staff 9. Dobi, without lawful justification and excuse, wilfully refused complying with the Ombudsman Act. They did willfully forge key important evidence of the case and make the false statements of the material facts of the case in their fraudulent decisions for covering up personal gain between the office and the WSIB.

 

Ontario Ombudsman Office

Legal Services

This team, led by the office’s senior counsel, supports the Ombudsman and his staff, overseeing human resources, ensuring that the office functions within its legislated mandate and providing export advice in support of the resolution and investigation of complaints. Members of the team pay a key role in the review and analysis of evidence during investigations and the preparation of reports and recommendations.

 

  1. This Legal Services was good, but the Ombudsman and his staff did wilfully fail to comply with the legal services of the Ombudsman office and Ontario Ombudsman Act. The office staff 8. Phillip had committed forgery who made a false investigation decision as a document which had been recorded in the Ombudsman file# 243042-001(WSIB), knowing it to be false, with the intent that any person should be induced, by the belief that are genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything. The staff 8. Phillips did not comply with Law and Professional Standard and Ethics.

 

The WSIB the fraudulent group’s N times illegal criminal activities had caused my Cervical Spine into the Permanent Aggravation. (Fact and Evidence 51 items had been submitted to the Ombudsman Ontario on July 6, 2011 by registered mail.)

 

  1. On August 3, 2011, Staff 8. Phillips had investigated the fraudulent case filed in the telephone, with a translator between her and me. She inquired Staff 1. Dicarlo to forge Medical Document’s Evidence, and I told her that this Evidence was in the #26-#27 of the Fact and Evidence 51items..

 

She did require me to choice an office to resolve the fraudulent case between the Ombudsman and Tribunal, I told her ” I choice the Ombudsman because I did agree the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010, and Tribunal doesn’t deal with fraudulent case”. She again told me that the Ombudsman Decision was final level decision.

 

  1. After over eight Months, the staff 8. Phillips did refuse to investigate the fraudulent case and make the false statements of the material facts of the case and forge the key important Evidence dated September 28, 2007 in her decision dated April 10, 2012.

 

  1. Staff 8.Phillips did make the false statements of material facts of the case in her fraudulent decision and her intent did be to deceive all people. She had made the False Statement of the material fact of the case. She had painstakingly machinated each paragraph and forged all facts of the case in her decision dated April 10, 2012.

 

  1. During delay the nine months, the WSIB did collude with Ontario Ombudsman Office. The two Province Organizations formed a intention in common to carry out an unlawful purpose. During carrying out this unlawful purpose, they supported and assisted each other between the Ombudsman Office and the WSIB.

 

For example, on October 25, 2011, Staff 8. Phillips did make inquiries to Staff 4. Badovinac:

Date: October 25, 2011

Dear Ms. Badovinac:

I am writing to confirm that in a telephone conversation with Mr.Gao of August 3, 2011, he gave consent for our Office to make inquiries regarding the WSIB’s administrative actions and decisions on his claim.

 

As you know, the Office of the Ontario Ombudsman is mandated pursuant to Section 19(1) to require any officer, employee or any governmental organization to furnish information or produce documents or things relating to any matter being investigated.

 

Please contact me should you have any further questions or concerns.

Regards,

Dahlia Phillips

Early Resolution Officer

416-5863451                                    E-58

 

  1. This inquiry was changed into a private trade because there have not been a word to be noted in the document MEMO of the case, and both staff 4. Badovinac and staff 8.Phillips didn’t also state a word with respect to the Inquiry of the fax dated October 25, 2011. For example, I called to the WSIB, nobody answered it which was noted in the document MEMO of the case and had MEMO# number.

 

“regarding the WSIB’s administrative actions and decisions on his claim.”

Whether or not the WSIB’s administrative actions on my claim were frauds, violation laws, not to answer.

Whether or not decisions on my claim were fraudulent decisions(5fraudulent decisions), not to answer.

  1. Staff 8.Phillips’ s fraudulent decision dated April 10, 2012 P.1-1

(1). I am writing further to our conversation on March 20, 2012 during which we discussed that our Office has completed a review of your complaint about the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (the Board). For the reasons explained below, our Office will not be reviewing this matter further.”

 

On July 6, 2011, I submitted my accusations (Fact and Evidence 51 items) to the office with respect to the illegal criminal activities of the fraudulent group of WSIB Ontario. On August 3, 2011, the staff 8. Phillips did call me and investigate the Fraudulent Case filed. She had clearly indicated  investigating the Fraudulent Case in light of Ontario Ombudsman Act.

 

In the telephone of March 20, 2012, the staff 8. Phillips did wilfully refuse investigating the fraudulent case after delay over eight months. I did submit the accusation to the Ombudsman to be in light of the direction of the WSIB FPC Commissioner. I did accuse the WSIB’ s illegal criminal activities which had caused my injured Cervical Spine into Permanent Aggravation and made me to lose the profession.

 

Ombudsman Act

Function of Ombudsman

  1. ( 1)The function of ombudsman is to investigate any decision or recommendation made or any act done or omitted in the course of the administration of a governmental organization and affecting any person or body of persons in his, her or its personal capacity. R.S.O. 1990, c, O. 6, s. 14 (1).

Investigation on complaint

(2)The Ombudsman may made any such investigation on a complaint made to him or her by any person affected or by any member of the Assembly to whom a complaint is made by any person affected, or of the Ombudsman’s own motion. R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 6, s. 14 (2)

.

The Ombudsman Act has Clearly indicated the Function of Ombudsman. On July 6, 2011, I had sent the Fraudulent Group’s Illegal Criminal Activities-Fact and Evidence 51 items to the Ombudsman Ontario, to which the staff 8. Phillips has not responded a word.

 

Subsequent to send to her:

On September 15, 2011 I did send the fax 5 pages to the staff 8.;

On October 2, 2011 I did send the registered mail 9 pages to the her;

On November 2, 2011 I did send the fax 3 pages to the her;

On November 9, 2011 I did send the fax 3 pages to the her;

On November 29 I did send the fax 9 pages to the her,

On December 11, 2011 I did send fax 4 pages to the her,

On December 21, 2011 I did send fax P15 to the her;

On January 9, 2012 I did send fax 16 pages to the her.

On February 22, 2012 I did send fax 1page to the her, Inquiry

On March 2, 2012 I did send fax 1 page to the her.  Inquiry

On March 14, 2012 I did send fax 1 page to the her. Inquiry

 

Above 8 letters were to further disclose the Fraudulent Group’s Illegal Criminal Activities and to disclose that Staff 4. Badovinac had forged all statements of Legal Evidences and made the false document MEMO#55 dated August 8, 2011 and made fifth fraudulent decision of the case dated September 20, 2011 in light of her false document MEMO#55.

.Staff 8. Phillips’ s fraudulent decision dated April 10, 2012 P.1-2

(2). You explained that following a work related accident on September 24, 2007, you submitted supporting documentation to the Board on September 28, 2007 by registered mail, and expressed concerns that your employer delayed in submitting information about the accident to the Board, and you believe the Board delayed in setting up your claim. You also expressed concerns regarding the information contained in the boards records from your time spent in China, and a special statement from a medical document dated December 3, 2007. You also raised concerns that the Board delayed in referring you to a functional restoration program (FRP) and in paying you loss of earnings benefits further to the Appeals Resolution Officers (ARO) decision of May 7, 2010.

 

(3). “you submitted supporting documentation to the Board on September 28, 2007 by registered mail,

 

It was that I submitted my Claim Form6 to the WSIB by registered mail dated September 28, 2007. It was not Staff 8. Phillips had painstakingly machinated the false statement which had thoroughly changed the nature of the fraudulent case. The WSIB corrupt group colluded with my employer, detained my Claim Form dated September 28, 2007. The corrupt group did refuse providing the WSIB with legal jurisdiction pertaining to the claim and treatment of the injuries sustained as a result of the occupational injury of September 24, 2007. The fraudulent case’s key focus did be that the corrupt group colluded with my employer and detained the Claim Form6 dated September 28, 2007. Please the ERO answer that NO claim file6, where did the “supporting documentation” be sent to??? The ERO Phillips publicly made the Words Game’s decision.

 

Following is that the WSIB Access Department provided the evidence which did prove that the ERO Phillips made Fraud and Forgery.

 

The ERO Phillips did forge the key important Evidence of the fraudulent case dated September 28, 2007.

Please see evidence E-1 the Claim Form6 and the receipt which had been submitted to her.

 

The registered mail of September 28, 2007 was the Claim Form6 which was intercepted and detained by the WSIB the staff 1. Staff 2, staff 3. , staff 4, the Office’s staff 8. Phillips did falsify the Claim Form6 into “supporting documentation“. Please Staff 8. Phillips answer that the Case didn’t be registered and filed, where did the “supporting documentationbe sent to?

 

Staff 8. Phillips had clearly known that the “Claim Form6” was intercepted and detained to be this fraudulent case’ s key part, so the staff 8. Phillips had painstakingly machinated the Forgery the evidence. Her intent is altering this fraudulent case for covering up the corrupt group’s illegal criminal activities.

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:

“On September 24, 2007 this driver was injured during a motor vehicle accident (MVA) while he was sleeping in the sleeper compartment of a tractor trailer.”

 

It was guilty of an offence that the staff 8. Phillips had made the false statements of the material facts of the case and forged Fact and Evidence in her decision. The staff 8. Phillips committed forgery who made the false decision, knowing it to be false, with intent that any person should be induced, by the belief that it was genuine, to do or to refrain from doing anything.

 

Staff 8. Phillips had very clearly known the fraudulent group’s illegal criminal activities by the Fact and Evidence “51 items” submitted to her on July 6, 2011 and she had also investigated the fraudulent case filed on August 3, 2011. Subsequent to I had again sent 8 times fax to her with respect to the fraudulent group’s illegal criminal activities.

 

The staff 8. Phillips who,

without lawful justification or excuse, wilfully obstructs, hinders and resists the Ombudsman Act;

without lawful justification or excuse, refuses to comply with any lawful requirement of the Ombudsman Act;

wilfully makes the false statements of the material facts to mislead the case’s investigators,

is guilty of an offence.

 

(4). “and expressed concerns that your employer delayed in submitting information about the accident to the Board,

 

It was the employer and the WSIB staff 1., staff 2., and staff 3. together did make frauds rejecting submitting the Form7 Report to the WSIB beyond two months of Lawful time.

 

The WSIB Law: “The WSIB must receive an employer’s complete accident report within seven business days of the employer learning of the reporting obligation”

 

The accident date was September 24, 2007. After they made the deal/trading, the employer did complete the accident report was on December 20, 2007, which had violated the Law’s rules over three month.  (Evidence is the report’s signature date)          E-6

 

The WSIB Law: “Worker must receive a copy of the accident report that is provided to the WSIB (including any additional information provided by employer).”  I did not receive it.

 

The WSIB Law: “Employer’s failure to comply: At the initial entitlement stage of a claim, the WSIB may levy four separate $250 penalties.one each for * late reporting * incomplete reporting * not reporting on a pre- approved version of the form, and * failing to provide a copy of the Form 7 to the worker.”

It was unknown for the Operations to levy the four separate $250, or NO.

 

WSIB Law: “The WSIB may again levy these penalties if the employer fail to respond to subsequent requests for information, or at the time of a recurrence.

Because failing to comply is also a provincial offence, employers may be prosecuted. If convicted, employers are liable for a fine of up to * $25,000 or up to 6 months in jail, or both, for individuals, and * 100,000 for corporate entities.”

 

It was unknown whether the WSIB Law to fit to the WSIB these staff and the employer.

The accident’s date was September 24, 2007. I did mail the Claim Form6 to the WSIB was September 28, 2007. The WSIB staff and the employer’s date of the Deal was December 20, 2007 which did not have the MEMO to the claim file record. The WSIB Law did specify to be limited in Seven Business Days, but they did operate the Report’ s time was about THREE MONTHS.

 

(5). “and expressed concerns..”

 

This was not my concerns, my concerns were that the WSIB staff have been making the fraudulent conspiracies and illegal criminal activities which had Caused my injured Cervical Spine into the Permanent Aggravation, and the WSIB had not returned my LOE benefits ruled on by the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010. These illegal criminal activities had been proved by the ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010. But nobody and any Province Organizations can stop their illegal criminal activities.

 

(6). you believe the Board delayed in setting up your claim”

 

My accusation was the WSIB staff had intercepted and detained my Claim Form6 dated September 28, 2007 and made N times fraudulent conspiracies and illegal criminal activities which had caused my injured cervical spine into permanent aggravation.

 

The Fact and Evidence have proved that the WSIB staff had detained my Claim Form6 from the WSIB Mail-Centre on October 2, 2007. The WSIB staff 1. Dicarlo, staff 2. Reis and staff 3. darwin had deprived my entitlement and Legal treatment rights ruled on by Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008.

.(7). ”…regarding the information contained in the boards records from your time spent in China,”

 

The staff 8. Phillips had not indicated what information the “board’s records” was, but she did have implied the “board’s records” which was the staff 2. Reis and staff 3.Darwin to forge documents#22, #17, #19(on October 2007 the worker resided in China and work-injury). This was the staff 8. Phillips painstakingly machinated the paronomasia. It should be the Claim File records forged by the WSIB staff involved in the case, not to be“the boards records”. The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 which did expose these staff’s illegal criminal activities.

 

(8). “a special statement from a medical document dated December 3, 2007.”

 

The WSIB staff 1. Dicarlo, staff 2. Reis and staff 3.Darwin had together forged the Medical Document dated December 3, 2007. Please evidences;

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state that: (Original)P3-10

“Of particular note is the clinical documentation provided by the physicians in China. The notations for December 3, 2007 appear to have been duplicated.

 

The WSIB medical document #276 dated December 3, 2007  Original:

Treatment:

The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China. Fell and hurt the waist and neck area. Concussion. Always dizzy…. Waist and neck ligament injury”.

 

The WSIB staff had forged the medical document dated December 3, 2007:

“the patient was suffering from work- related injury outside China. Hurting the neck area. Always feeling faint due to injury by a sudden jerk”.

 

The forged Medical Document dated December 3, 2007 was recorded in the Claim File. The WSIB staff had detained all Treatment Documentations, Diagnosis Reports and almost all medication receipts which had not been recorded in the Claim File from2007 through to 2010. (Evidence: Medical Document Original#276; Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008; the WSIB Final Decision P.4 dated May 7, 2010)   E-9; E-10; E-11; E-12

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:

P.2-4, ” The examination was conducted on June 11, 2008 and the worker was discharged with a mild closed head injury, soft tissue injuries to the neck and low back. The examiner noted that the worker presented with persistent soft tissue injuries and required a functional Restoration Program (FRP) in an attempt to return to employment. He also considered that the worker was not capable of returning to his regular occupation as a driver until after the FRP.”  

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that:  P.4-1

“It is unknown whether two opposing histories dated the same date pertain to the same person. The worker indicated in his submission that he did have evidence to dispute what would appear to be a false history provided on December 3, 2007. It is unknown to the ARO the genesis of this particular history but the worker does present with continued or chronic soft tissue injury beginning in September 2007 and lasting through to his return to Canada in February 2008.”

The Decision did disclose the WSIB forged the medical documents and the claim file record.

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.4-5 P4-8

“Subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinic documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker, any clinic documentation between February 2008 and June 2008……..LOE benefits are restored to the worker June 7, 2008 through to June 7, 2008. Once again Operations is instructed to secure any additional clinic documentation that may be available with the assistance of the worker to determine any continuation of LOE benefits.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.5 CONCLUSION

“Operations is instructed, with the assistance of the worker, to secure any clinical documentation between the worker’s return to Canada in February 2008 through to June 2008. Once again with the assistance of the worker Operations is to ensure that any documentation subsequent to June 11, 2008 through to the present time be submitted to the claim file record.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision had disclosed the WSIB fraudulent group’s illegal criminal activities “forged medical documentations” and “detained almost all medical documentations”.

 

(9). “delayed in referring you to a functional restoration program (FRP)”

 

The fraudulent group had deprived my Legal Treatment Rights instructed by Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008, which had caused my injured cervical spine into Permanent Aggravation. The WSIB staff had wilfully made false medical document dated December 3, 2007 and false documents# 17, 19 and 22 and refused to carry out Medical Legal Report and refused arrangement treatment for my injured cervical spine and low back from October 2007 through to April 2011. The WSIB staff had wilfully refused to provide the WSIB with legal jurisdiction pertaining to the claim and treatment of the injuries sustained as a result of the occupational injury of September 24, 2007.

 

(10). “in paying you loss of earnings benefits further to the Appeals Resolution Officers (ARO) decision of May 7, 2010.

 

The WSIB fraudulent group had not paid the LOE benefits to me in light of the ARO’s decision of May 7, 2010.

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.4-5

“Subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinic documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker, any clinic documentation between February 2008 and June 2008.”

The Decision did disclose the WSIB staff to detain all medical documents.

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.4-8

“LOE benefits are restored to the worker June 7, 2008 through to June 7, 2008. Once again Operations is instructed to secure any additional clinic documentation that may be available with the assistance of the worker to determine any continuation of LOE benefits.”

The WSIB does not pay to me the LOE benefits awarded by the WSIB Final Decision.

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.5-4  CONCLUSION

“Operations is instructed, with the assistance of the worker, to secure any clinical documentation between the worker’s return to Canada in February 2008 through to June 2008. Once again with the assistance of the worker Operations is to ensure that any documentation subsequent to June 11, 2008 through to the present time be submitted to the claim file record.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.5-3  CONCLUSION

“The clinical documentation does support that the worker did secure the services of a general practitioner mainly a Dr. Eng and LOE benefits were restored effective June 7, 2008 through to June 11, 2008 (the date of the IME).”

The WSIB does not pay to me the LOE benefits awarded by the WSIB Final Decision, and the WSIB fraudulent group had firmly not carried out the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010.

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.2-6

“The worker has requested continuation of LOE benefits and reimbursement of his medical expenses and these issues are now before the Appeals Resolution Officer (ARO) for further consideration.

AUTHORITY

The ARO will consider the worker’s appeal in light of Operational Policy Documents;

18-03-02- Payment of LOE Benefits.”

 

The ARO had made the MEMO#30 dated May 7, 2010 did state that:

“Please note my decision dated May 7, 2010. The appeal has been granted.”

 E-11A   MEMO#30

Staff 8. Phillips’ s fraudulent decision P.1-3

(11). “As you may know, the Office of the Ontario Ombudsman reviews complaints about the administrative conduct of provincial organizations and is generally an office of last resort. In addition to reviewing you submissions, our Office discussed your concerns with the Board, and obtained and reviewed further documents from the Boards file, including its responses to your concerns.”

 

(12). “As you may know, the Office of the Ontario Ombudsman reviews complaints about the administrative conduct of provincial organizations and is generally an office of last resort. In addition to reviewing you submissions, our Office discussed your concerns with the Board,”

 

Ontario Ombudsman Act.

Function of Ombudsman

(1) The function of ombudsman is to investigate any decision or recommendation made or any act done or omitted in the course of the administration of a governmental organization and affecting any person or body of persons in his, her or its personal capacity. R.S.O. 1990, c, O. 6, s. 14 (1).

Investigation on complaint

The Ombudsman may made any such investigation on a complaint made to him or her by any person affected or by any member of the Assembly to whom a complaint is made by any person affected, or of the Ombudsman’s own motion. R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 6, s. 14 (2)

The Ombudsman Act has clearly indicated the Function of Ombudsman.

 

(13). “administrative conduct of provincial organizations”

 

What should “administrative conduct of province organization” be???

Should it be ” make illegal criminal activities, forge the Claim File and Medical Documents, make five fraudulent decisions from 2007 beginning to now including the staff 8. Phillips” ?

 

On July 6, 2011, I did mail my accusation with respect to the fraudulent group’s illegal criminal activities (fact and evidence 51 items) to the Ombudsman Ontario. On August 3, 2011, the staff 8.Phillips had checked my accusation filed and Fact – Evidence 51 items and indicated that the fraudulent case will be investigated and dealt with, and she did require me to choice an organization to deal with the case between the Office and Tribunal.

 

Staff 8. Phillips also asked me, “Whether have you submitted the forged medical document dated December 3, 2007 in the Submitted 51 items?” I told her that the forged medical documentation was in the 27th of the 51 items and the Original was in the 26th of the 51 items, which came from the WSIB Access Department. The staff 8. Phillips had clearly indicated investigation the fraudulent case on August 3, 2011.

The corrupt group forged medical document dated December 3, 2007. Evidence from the WSIB Access Department. Please contrast the forgery and Original’ underlined parts

The WSIB Access Department provided the document’s Original 

(17). 2016

 

Subsequently, I had again mailed my accusation to the staff 8. Phillips (8 times). The accusations were that the fraudulent group member-staff 4. Badovinac had forged the statements of X-RAY Report dated March 29, 2008, Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008, the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010, LifeMark Assessment Report dated April 28, 2011, LifeMark Discharge Report dated July 8, 2011 and forged document MEMO#55.  She again made a fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011 in light of forged Document MEMO#55. Why did the staff 4. Badovinac forge document MEMO#55?  She did be afraid of all legal evidences Original and genuine medical documentations which must expose her crimes.

 

The WSIB Fair Practices Commission’s Commissioner did point out that it was open to you contacting Ombudsman Ontario. Their address is………., telephone ……”.

 

(14). “In addition to reviewing you submissions, our Office discussed your concerns with the Board,”

 

Staff 8. Phillips had Clearly known all facts and evidences according to my submissions, but she had never responded a word to these illegal criminal activities made by the WSIB staff during delay Nine Months. She had openly made the false statement of the material fact of the case and she had also openly forged the case’s key important Evidence dated September 28, 2007.

 

 

(15). “the administrative conduct of provincial organizations

 

After the staff 8. Phillips had painstakingly delayed Nine Months, she did refuse complying with Ontario Ombudsman Act and forge the case’s important key evidence and make the false statements of material facts of the case. Please the staff 8. Phillips does respond, what conduct should her the “activities” be?

 

“obtained and reviewed further documents from the Boards file,”

 

It was the forged Claim File of the case, and the ERO Phillips clearly knew the details, but she had still used the forged claim file as if it were genuine.

 

(16). “including its responses to your concerns.”

 

The “its responses” was the WSIB staff 5. Locke, staff 6. Johnson, staff 7. Gilkinson’s false responses/decisions which had been exposed by facts and evidences, and I had sent it to the staff 8. Phillips.

                       E-56, E-57, E-58 Please see Lawsuit Fact-Evidence (5) (6) (7).

 

Staff 8. Phillips ‘s fraudulent decision P.1-4

(17). “Based on the information reviewed and our inquiries, the Board allowed your claim further to your accident on September 24, 2007 for Loss of Earnings (LOE) to October 24, 2007. The Board explained that the Claims Registration Department established your claim on October 23, 2007, the date it received your forms. On November 1, the Board advised you and the employer that it required a signed Election Form to continue with your claim. The form was mailed to you on November 5, and the Board received the signed form on November 14. The case manager began activities on your file on November 19, and your claim was allowed on November 23.”

 

The paragraph was from staff 5. Manager Locke and staff 7.Vice-Presidant Gilkinson’s false statements/decision P.2-2 and P.1-4, and I had exposed it with facts and evidences and sent it to the staff 8. ERO Phillips. She still used it as evidence as if it were genuine. Her intent was covering up their deal/trading between them . Please see Lawsuit Fact-Evidence (staff 5) (staff 7).

 

Please the staff 8. Phillips did recall the WSIB staff’s illegal criminal activities.

The WSIB corrupt group had intercepted and detained my Claim Form6 and refused providing the WSIB with Legal Jurisdiction pertaining to the Claim and Treatment of the injuries sustained as a result of the occupational injury of September 24, 2007.

 

Staff 1. Dicarlo had continuously made four fraudulent decisions and N times’ s illegal criminal activities and forged the Medical Document dated December 3, 2007 and the Claim File, etc. The staff 1 DiCarlo made fraudulent letter, framed up the injured worker (me) and the ARO. But the ARO’s letter did expose the staff 1 DiCarlo’s frauds. Please contrast two letters’ Date and content.

Following is that the ARO did give me first letter.

The staff 1 DiCarlo’s fraudulent letter. Please see the Date of October 15, 2009‘s fraudulent statement. The WSIB ARO did give me first letter dated October 15, 2009 above.

The WSIB Appeals Branch Executive Director’s letter did expose the corrupt group’s evil conspiracies. If an Appeals is withdrawn, the case has already been ended, in other words, the case will be forever died. This is their final conspiracy-as same as Ontario Ombudsman, court Manager Doria, federally appointed judge Myers, CJC executive director Sabourin, who are Canada Supreme Corrupt Officers.

Staff 2. Reis had forged the document MEMO#22 which had caused the case into the complexity. She had made the frauds to the case’s investigator instructed by prior President & CEO WSIB Ontario on September 19, 2009 and continuously stopped three Fair/Just CM’s rights carrying out the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010.

 

Staff 3. Darwin had made the false document MEMO #17, #19 which had caused the case into the more complexity, and made the forged Medical History Record which had been sent to different Legal Medical Assessment Organizations. Please see staff 3.

 

Staff 4. Badovinac had forged all statements of the Medical Documentations, Medical Legal Report, Ontario WSIB Final Decision, LifeMark Health Centre’s Assessment Report and Discharge Report to have made the false document MEMO#55. And the staff 4. Badovinac had made fifth fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011 in light of her forged document MEMO#55 for refusing carrying out the ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010.

 

Staff 5. Locke had made false investigation response/decision dated November 10, 2010 and continuously stopped three Fair/Just CM’s right carrying out the WSIB Final Decision for resisting the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010.

.

Staff 6.Johnson had two times made false investigation responses/decisions deceiving prior and present Presidents & CEO, WSIB Ontario. First time was on September 23, 2008. Second time was on November 15, 2010 for covering up their illegal criminal activities.     E-26, E-43

 

Staff 7. Gilkinison had made false investigation response/decision dated May 5, 2011 which had made material additions and alteration to the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 and made the WSIB Final Decision unable be carried out.

 

The staff 8. Phillips had seriously violated Law and professional Ethics and Standards, who had made false investigation decision dated April 10, 2012. In her false decision, she had forged the key important evidence of the case dated September 28, 2007 and made false statements of the material facts of the case. The staff 8 Phillips had caused that nobody and any Province Organization did dare to deal with the fraudulent case and damaged Ontario Ombudsman Office’s reputation as a result of the Ontario Ombudsman’s support.

 

Staff 9. Dobi had seriously violated Law and professional Ethics and Standards, who had made false investigation decision dated September 28, 2012. In her decision, she did forge evidence and make false statements of the material facts of the case for supporting the WSIB staff’s illegal criminal activities as a result of the Ontario Ombudsman’s support.

 

The Rule of Law

Our laws embody the basic moral values of our society….. It is against the law to steal, to injure another person,…… We are said to be ruled by law, not by those who enforce the law or wield government power. No one in Canada is above the law. Everyone, no matter how wealthy or how powerful they are, must obey the law or face the consequences.

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that P4-4

“The ARO does conclude that the worker was involved in a medical rehabilitation program and in attempting to secure symptomatic relief and also seek treatment prior to leaving to British Columbia is therefore entitled to LOE benefit from the date of closure October 24, 2007 through to his departure in November 2009. Although not clear the ARO believes that the worker exited Canada on November 27, or 28, 2007 and therefore LOE benefits are awarded to the earlier date until such time as confirmation of departure is supplied.”

The WSIB Final Decision had proved that the documents17#, 19#, 22# was false documents.

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P4-5. P4-8

“Subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinic documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker, any clinic documentation between February 2008 and June 2008……..LOE benefits are restored to the worker June 7, 2008 through to June 7, 2008. Once again Operations is instructed to secure any additional clinic documentation that may be available with the assistance of the worker to determine any continuation of LOE benefits.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.5 CONCLUSION

“Operations is instructed, with the assistance of the worker, to secure any clinical documentation between the worker’s return to Canada in February 2008 through to June 2008. Once again with the assistance of the worker Operations is to ensure that any documentation subsequent to June 11, 2008 through to the present time be submitted to the claim file record.”

The Decision did disclose the WSIB staff detained all medical documents and forge the claim file record.

“The Board explained that the Claims Registration Department established your claim on October 23, 2007, the date it received your forms.”

 

Fact and Evidence are unable to be forged and destroyed. The staff 8. Phillips should show evidence supporting her forgery. Firstly, the staff 8.Phillips should show the facts and evidences to prove the fraudulent group’s illegal criminal activities to be the correct activities. She should not painstakingly scheme the forgery deceiving Investigators in her fraudulent decision dated April 10, 2012. Secondly, why did the Registration Department establish the Claim File on October 23, 2007? Who sent the register Mail (Claim Form6) to the Registration Department on this day? This Department should have a record for checking. This was the most general management. The WSIB had signed receiving the Claim form6 on October 2, 2007.

Why does the fraudulent group have been making illegal criminal activities through to today? It is just the staff 8.Phillips who have stronger government power protecting them.

 

(18). “and the Board received the signed form on November 14.”

 

On November 5, 2007 Mrs. Gupta sent to me a letter (Election Form). On November 9, 2007, I had signed and I (Myself) did send the Form to the WSIB. The WSIB had sealed on the Form dated 2007 NOV-9 PM 2:10. The WSIB did receive the signed Form to be on 2007 NOV-9 PM 2:10, not to be “November 14.

Following evidence proves she made the false statement which conceals the fraudulent case’s key focus.

The staff 8.Phillips doesn’t respond material questions, only to be small thing, but also make frauds.

E-48

  • . “The case manager began activities on your file on November 19, and your claim was allowed on November 23.”

 

The staff 8. Phillips had clearly known the fraudulent case’s details, but she still made the false statements of material facts of the case. Please see the WSIB staff 1. Dicarlo made first fraudulent decision part and Lawsuit Fact-Evidence (1).                 E-1 to E-5

 

Staff 8. Phillips’s fraudulent decision P.2-1

(20). “The Board advised that it did not need information from your employer in order to allow your claim. The issue regarding your concerns about delay had been addressed in letters to you dated November 10, 2010 from the Manager of Operations, and a letter from the Vice President, Service Delivery dated May 5, 2011, that he could not agree that there was any delay in the initial adjudication of your claim based on the above chronology.”

 

(21). “The Board advised that it did not need information from your employer in order to allow your claim.”

 

This was the frauds “The Board advised that it did not need information from your employer in order to allow your claim”. Did this frauds come from the Board? Did this frauds come from the staff 8. Phillips?

 

The WSIB Law:

“The WSIB must receive an employer’s complete accident report within seven business days of the employer learning of the reporting obligation”

The accident date was September 24, 2007. After both staff 1. Dicarlo and the employer had made the deal/trading, the employer did complete the accident report was on December 20, 2007, which had violated the Law over three month.  (attached Evidence was the employer report’s signature date)

E-6

Did “The WSIB intercepted and detained my Claim form6” be in order to allow my Claim?

Did “The WSIB made N times illegal criminal activities” be in order to allow my Claim?

Did “The WSIB made N times false documents to the Claim File” be in order to allow my Claim?

Did “The WSIB deprived my legal treatment rights instructed by Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008″ be in order to allow my Claim?

Did “The WSIB made five fraudulent decisions” be in order to allow my Claim?

Did “The WSIB intercepted and detained my Submissions required 21days by the ARO” be in order to allow my Claim?

Did “The WSIB firmly not carried out the instructions of the Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008″ be in order to allow my Claim?

Did “The WSIB firmly not carried out the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010″ be in order to allow my Claim?

 

(22). “The issue regarding your concerns about delay had been addressed in letters to you dated November 10, 2010 from the Manager of Operations,”

 

The WSIB staff 5. Locke did make the false investigation response/decision dated November 10, 2010. She made the false statement of material facts of the Case, intent deceiving the Investigators. I had sent my Objections with the evidence to her but she had never responded a word to my Objections. I had submitted her false investigation response/decision and my Objections with the evidences to Ombudsman Ontario on July 6, 2011.(51 items) The staff 8. Phillips should Clearly know these facts in light of the these evidences submitted. However, she did continue make frauds.

 

The staff 5. Locke made the false statement of the material fact of the Case, except make frauds, what could she do?

Did she address who intercepted and detained my Claim Form6?

Did she address the WSIB made N times illegal criminal activities and the consequences caused ?

Did she address the WSIB forged the Claim File Record?

Did she address the WSIB deprived my legal treatment rights and caused my C- Spine into permanent aggravation?

Did she address the WSIB had made five fraudulent decisions and forged medical documents?

Did she address the WSIB didn’t firmly carried out the Medical Legal Report?

Did she address the WSIB didn’t firmly carried out the WSIB Final Decision?

Did she address the WSIB staff 4.Badovinac had forged all statements of X-ray Report, Medical Legal Report, Medical Documentations, Medical Assessment Reports and Discharge Report and forged document#55?                     Please see Lawsuit Fact-Evidence (4)

 

(23). “a letter from the Vice President, Service Delivery dated May 5, 2011, that he could not agree that there was any delay in the initial adjudication of your claim based on the above chronology”

 

Can the staff 7.Vice President Gilknson himself represent Law? Fact and Evidence had proved that he forged the decision of May 5, 2011 which had been submitted to the staff 8. Phillips. She still used it as if it was genuine, intent to induce investigators. In the staff 8. Phillips’s false decision, she didn’t show any evidence to support her frauds.

 

Ontario Ombudsman Office

Legal Services

This team, led by the office’s senior counsel, supports the Ombudsman and his staff, overseeing human resources, ensuring that the office functions within its legislated mandate and providing export advice in support of the resolution and investigation of complaints. Members of the team pay a key role in the review and analysis of evidence during investigations and the preparation of reports and recommendations.

This Legal Services was good, but the Office staff did wilfully fail to comply with the legal services of the Ombudsman office.

 

Ontario Ombudsman Act.

Function of Ombudsman

  1. (1) The function of ombudsman is to investigate any decision or recommendation made or any act done or omitted in the course of the administration of a governmental organization and affecting any person or body of persons in his, her or its personal capacity. R.S.O. 1990, c, O. 6, s. 14 (1).

Investigation on complaint

The Ombudsman may made any such investigation on a complaint made to him or her by any person affected or by any member of the Assembly to whom a complaint is made by any person affected, or of the Ombudsman’s own motion. R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 6, s. 14 (2)

The Ombudsman Act has clearly indicated the Function of Ombudsman. but the Office staff did wilfully fail to comply with the Ontario Ombudsman Act.

 

The WSIB staff 7. Gilkinson’s response dated June 2, 2011 had clearly indicated that he would refuse to respond any problem to the fraudulent case after he had read my Objections with the evidence. Staff 7. Gilkinson’s response/decision dated May 5, 2011 and response dated June 2, 2011 and my Objections with the Evidence had been submitted to the staff 8. Phillips. (5 times) The staff 8. Phillips did make the (words game) Paronomasia “base on the above chronology”, which chronology?  Why did she not directly show “based on the September 28, 2007” or “based on the November 1, 2007”? Why did she avoid involving the evidence of the registered mail dated September 28, 2007? It was just she had forged the registered mail (Claim Form6)dated September 28, 2007 into the mail “supporting document dated September 28, 2007” so she only used the “chronology” deceiving investigators.

 

The WSIB staff 3. Darwin’s fax dated December 4, 2007 had clearly proved that Staff 1. Dicarlo had made first fraudulent decision dated November 23, 2007 and further proved that the WSIB had intercepted and detained my Claim Form6 dated September 28, 2007. Please see Lawsuit Fact – Evidence (1).

Following is the staff 3- Nurse Manager, Darwin’s fax which did expose the WSIB staff 1 to staff 7 and the staff 8 make illegal criminal activities-Forgery and Fraud. When the staff 3 Darwin faxed the Form to USA on December 03, 2007, My Claim didn’t still be approved. Please see her fax’s first paragraph which proves staff 1 to staff 9 make frauds from beginning to today, including the Ombudsman, Ontario superior court Manager Doria and registrars, federally appointed judge Myers and CJC executive director Sabourin who commits Forgery and Fraud pursuant to Canada Criminal Code; 366,367, 368; 380(1), 380 1.(1)

 

These evidence are Claim Form6’s date, registered mail receipt’s date, the WSIB staff 3. Darwin’s fax, the WSIB Final Decision, N times illegal criminal activities, Lawsuit Fact-Evidence (1) to (7).

 

Because the staff 8. Phillips did clearly know these Facts and Evidences, so she did painstakingly machinate the (words game)paronomasia in order to deceive Investigators. Because the staff 8.Phillips did be afraid of these Evidences, so she can only make the (words game) Paronomasia to deceive investigators.

 

On August 3, 2011, the staff 8. Phillips did have investigated my accusation dated July 6, 2011, and she had clearly indicated to investigate the fraudulent case. She had also investigated the forged medical documentation dated December 3, 2007 made by staff 1. Dicarlo, staff 2. Reis and staff 3. Darwin. The Medical Documentation’s Original number is # 276. I told her that the Evidences were arranged in #26 and #27 in Fact and Evidence 51 items.

 

Fact is the Basic, Law is the Criterion.

I had sent my four objections with the evidences to the WSIB staff 7. Gilkinson , especially sent to him this evidence which is the Registered Mail (Claim Form6) Receipt dated September 28, 2007. After he did see the fact and evidence, he did send to me a response dated June 2, 2011.The response did write: “I will not be responding to the additional questions you have listed…….”.I had not listed any additional question, only the WSIB had never answered these Important evidences which had exposed Defendants’s illegal criminal activities, so the Evidence was named “additional questions”. Just as the staff 8. Phillips had also never responded a word to these important evidences during delay nine months.Staff 7. Gilkinson’s response dated June 2, 2011 did write that “Both your letters are now on the file record and therefore your position is clearly evident. “My position is clearly evident”, why did the staff 8. Phillips not state the fact, and she continued to make frauds?

 

The staff 8. Phillips‘s fraudulent decision P.2-2

(24). “The Boards letter dated November 10, 2010 explained that the medical documentation from China was translated into English, which noted that the document stated, “injury caused by carrying out outdoor work commitment. Fell and injury neck and waist position.” You felt that this was false history provided” however; the Board explained that it cannot speak to the information provided by specialists who treated you in China. In any event the Board explained that information, although considered as part of the AROs review and decision of May 2010, had no negative impact on the outcome of the decision.”

 

(25). “The Boards letter dated November 10, 2010 explained that the medical documentation from China was translated into English, which noted that the document stated, “injury caused by carrying out outdoor work commitment. Fell and injury neck and waist position.”

 

In this paragraph, the staff 8. Phillips’s intent was to imply staff 2. Reis and staff 3.Darwin’s forged documents#22, 17, 19.

On July 6, 2011, the forged response/decision dated November 10, 2010 was submitted to the Ombudsman in the fact and evidence 51 items and the forged response/decision had been exposed with the evidences. Please see Lawsuit Fact-Evidence (5). It was Staff 5. Locke’s response/decision dated November 10, 2010.Why did the staff 8.Phillips not indicate the medical documentation’s date and Which medical documentation? The WSIB Final Decision had stated these facts and the medical documentation’s date.

 

(26). the medical documentation from China was translated into English,

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original)P3-10

“Of particular note is the clinical documentation provided by the physicians in China. The notations for December 3, 2007 appear to have been duplicated.”  E-11

The Decision exposed the WSIB staff forging the medical documentation dated December 3, 2007.

 

The WSIB medical document #276 dated December 3, 2007  Original:

Treatment:

The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China. Fell and hurt the waist and neck area. Concussion. Always dizzy…. Waist and neck ligament injury”.    E-9

 

The WSIB staff did forge the medical document dated December 3, 2007:

“the patient was suffering from work- related injury outside China. Hurting the neck area. Always feeling faint due to injury by a sudden jerk”.                    E-10

 

The forged Medical Document dated December 3, 2007 was recorded in the Claim File, and the WSIB staff had detained all Medical Documentations, Diagnosis Reports and almost all medication receipts which had not been recorded in the Claim File from 2007 through to 2010. (Evidence: Medical Document Original#276; Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008; the WSIB Final Decision P.4 dated May 7, 2010)     E-9; E-10; E-11; E-12

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.4

“It is unknown whether two opposing histories dated the same date pertain to the same person. The worker indicated in his submission that he did have evidence to dispute what would appear to be a false history provided on December 3, 2007. It is unknown to the ARO the genesis of this particular history but the worker does present with continued or chronic soft tissue injury beginning in September 2007 and lasting through to his return to Canada in February 2008.”

 

(27). injury caused by carrying out outdoor work commitment. Fell and injury neck and waist position.”

 

Staff 2. Reis had forged the document MEMO#22 dated September 19, 2008 which did write “…..in China IW was carrying out outdoor work commitment. Fell and injured neck and waist”.

(Evidence are her forged document MEMO#22, clinical documentation’s date in BC, WSIB Final Decision)                                  E-16, E-11, E-13. Staff 3. Darwin had forged the document MEMO#17 and 19.    E-17

On September 23, 2008, both staff 2. Reis and staff 6.Johnson had made a frauds to the investigation of prior President & CEO, WSIB Ontario. The frauds was “Ms. Reis has agreed that in light of the new medical information from China where you resided between October 28, 2007 and February 29, 2008….”  The underlined part is one of their conspiracies.

                               E-26   false response of Sep. 23, 2008  

                                                                                       

The WSIB Final Decision did state that P3-6

“The clinical notes provided by the attending physician in British Columbia dated November 27, 2007 noted that the worker underwent a MVA in September 2007…….The diagnosis provided by the attending physician was a soft tissue injury and treatment to start physiotherapy. It is also noted the worker was counseled to find a regular family physician for follow up.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that P4-4

“The ARO does conclude that the worker was involved in a medical rehabilitation program and in attempting to secure symptomatic relief and also seek treatment prior to leaving to British Columbia is therefore entitled to LOE benefit from the date of closure October 24, 2007 through to his departure in November 2009. Although not clear the ARO believes that the worker exited Canada on November 27, or 28, 2007 and therefore LOE benefits are awarded to the earlier date until such time as confirmation of departure is supplied.”

 

The fraudulent group had forged the Claim File was “on October 2007 I/W resided in China and work-injury”. The attending physician in British Columbia provided the clinical notes dated November 27, 2007 which had proved that the fraudulent group did make the frauds.

 

(28). the Board explained that it cannot speak to the information provided by specialists who treated you in China.

 

It was not the Board explained….. It just was the WSIB staff involved in the case explained they cannot speak to the documentation (no the information) because they had evilly forged the documentation dated December 3, 2007.  The ARO’s Decision had proved the fact above. E-9, 10, 11P.3-10

 

(29). In any event the Board explained that information, although considered as part of the AROs review and decision of May 2010, had no negative impact on the outcome of the decision.”

 

It was not the Board, it was the WSIB staff 5. Locke did forge the response/decision dated November 10, 2010. The staff 8. Phillips used “information” to replace the forged claim file which did directly impact the outcome of the Decision because Staff 1.to Staff 4 detained all medical documents and forged the claim file so the Decision couldn’t directly award to compensate my LOE benefits. This again gave the fraudulent group opportunity rejecting to carry out the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010.

 

From October 2, 2007 beginning, the Group have been forging the Claim File through to today. It is unknown these staff did want making what “negative impact”, but Staff 8. Phillips, without lawful reason and excuse, still used the forged claim file in her fraudulent decision as if it was genuine. These WSIB staff including the staff 8.Phillips and the staff 9. Dobi did not comply with the Law and Professional Ethics and Standard. They still continued forging decisions and documents.

 

Staff 8. Phillips’s fraudulent decision P2-3

The ARO’s May 7, 2010 decision concluded that based on the additional medical evidence reviewed, you continued to present with chronic soft tissue injury and it approved benefits to November 27, 2007 inclusive. According to the information obtained, a cheque was issued to you on May 27, 2010. The ARO also instructed the Board to arrange an FRP for you.”

 

(30). “The ARO’s May 7, 2010 decision concluded that based on the additional medical evidence reviewed”

 

Staff 8. Phillips was afraid to state the Original of the ARO’s Conclusion dated May 7, 2010.

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 had exposed that the WSIB staff did forge the claim file.

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:

P.2-4, ” The examination was conducted on June 11, 2008 and the worker was discharged with a mild closed head injury, soft tissue injuries to the neck and low back. The examiner noted that the worker presented with persistent soft tissue injuries and required a functional Restoration Program (FRP) in an attempt to return to employment. He also considered that the worker was not capable of returning to his regular occupation as a driver until after the FRP.”                 E-11

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original)                

P.4-1 “It is unknown whether two opposing histories dated the same date pertain to the same person. The worker indicated in his submissions that he did have evidence to dispute what would appear to be a false history provided on December 3, 2007. It is unknown to the ARO the genesis of this particular history but the worker does present with continued or chronic soft tissue injury beginning in September 2007 and lasting through to his return to Canada in February 2008.”

The Decision had exposed that the WSIB staff involved in the case forged the medical document dated December 3, 2007 and the medical historic records.

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state that

P4-2 ” the ARO in finding that the worker is not entitled to benefits for the period while outside the country the questionable history provided in December 2007 would not have appeared to have caused any significant aggravation in the ongoing problems being experienced by the worker. Even if it was accepted that the history of falling was indeed the worker, any aggravation of an ongoing problem would in all likelihood appear to have ceased and not caused any undue delay in recovery.”

The ARO did explose the forged Claim File made by the WSIB staff.

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state that

P.4-3 ” The clinical documentation that has been submitted to the record in particular prescription receipts that have been prescribed by Dr. Eng in June 2008 does indicate that the worker has in fact or may have in fact secured a regular family physician in British Columbia.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state that

P.4-4 “ The ARO does conclude that the worker was involved in a medical rehabilitation program and in attempting to secure symptomatic relief and also seek treatment prior to leaving to British Columbia is therefore entitled to LOE benefits from the date of closure October 24, 2007 through to his departure in November, 2007. Although not clear the ARO believes that the worker exited Canada on November 27 or 28, 2007 and therefore LOE benefits are awarded to the earlier date until such time as confirmation of departure is supplied.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state that

  1. 4-5 ” subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinical documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker any clinical documentation between February 2008 and June 2008.”

The Decision did disclose the WSIB staff to detain all medical documentations.

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state that

P4-6 P4-7″An IME was arranged for the worker and the worker was seen in June 2008 and the independent medical advisor concluded that the worker should embark upon a FRP.” “The ARO notes that the worker would indeed benefit from a FRP to assist him in returning to gainful employment.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state that

P4-8 “LOE benefits are restored to the worker June 7, 2008 through to June 11, 2008. Once again Operations is instructed to secure any additional clinic documentation that may be available with the assistance of the worker to determine any continuation of LOE benefits.”

The ARO did require the WSIB staff to return the detained medical documents to the Claim File Record.

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:

P.4-10″It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.

 

Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008 did state:

PAST HEALTH

“Past health has been good. He has not had any previous surgery and has not been hospitalized for any medical problems. He is not taking any medications and does not have a history of allergies...”

 E-12

The Medical Legal Report had concluded to Past Health.

 

The Medical Legal Report Original: P4-1

It is probable that at the present time he is unable to return to work as a trucker due to his ongoing symptoms.”

NO appropriate treatment has been provided.”

I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable.”

I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the “functional restoration program.

 

The Medical Legal Report’s Instruction dated June 11, 2008 was delayed to April 19, 2011.

        E-12, E-13

(31). “you continued to present with chronic soft tissue injury and it approved benefits to November 27, 2007…”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state that

P4-8 “LOE benefits are restored to the worker June 7, 2008 through to June 11, 2008. Once again Operations is instructed to secure any additional clinic documentation that may be available with the assistance of the worker to determine any continuation of LOE benefits.”

 

The ARO did require the WSIB to return the detained medical documents to the Claim File and determine any continuation of LOE benefits, but the WSIB staff involved in the case didn’t firmly carry out it.

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:

P.4-10″It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment.The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.

 

Staff 8. Phillips’ s fraudulent decision P.2-4

(32). “With regards to the set up of the FRP, the Board confirmed that it initially arranged for you to complete the program in Toronto. The Board acknowledged that it was not appropriate for you to travel to Toronto, and required that you have your physician to refer to you to the program in Vancouver. The Board also acknowledged that a nurse consultant eventually arranged the FRP for you in Vancouver, and that LOE benefits would be payed to you during your participation in the program.

 

(33). “with respect to the set up of the FRP, the Board confirmed that it initially arranged for you to complete the program in Toronto. The Board acknowledged that it was not appropriate for you to travel to Toronto

 

Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008 did state:

” NO Appropriate Treatment has been provided “.

” I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the “ functional restoration program .”

” I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable.”

 

This FRP had seriously been delayed to April 19, 2011 as a result of the WSIB staff to have been making the illegal criminal activities, which had caused my cervical spine into permanent aggravation.

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:

  1. 4-10 ” It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did again instruct that the WSIB staff arranged the FRP, but they did still delay the FRP to April 19, 2011.

 

(34). The Board acknowledged that it was not appropriate for you to travel to Toronto,”

 

It was very appropriately that Ms. C. Duhamel, Nurse Consultant of the WSIB had made the FRP of June 7, 2010.I had booked the plane ticket of June 6, 2010 and informed the Consultant, Ms. Duhamel by the fax.

If Staff 1. Dicarlo had not canceled the Assessment/FRP of June 7, 2010, the WSIB staff’s illegal criminal activities would have early been disclosed by the Assessment/FRP of June 7, 2010.

 

Please staff 8.Phillips did answer following,

The WSIB staff intercepted and detained my Claim form6 and refused providing the WSIB with Legal Jurisdiction pertaining to the Claim and Treatment of the injuries sustained as a result of the occupational injury of September 24, 2007. Did these “activities” be appropriate?

The WSIB staff made N times illegal criminal activities, were these appropriate?

The WSIB staff refused to carry out Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008, was this appropriate?

The WSIB staff refused to carry out the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010, was this appropriate?

The WSIB staff forged responses/decisions and forged the Claim File Record, were these appropriate?

The WSIB staff have been making the illegal criminal activities from 2007 through to the present 2014 which had caused my injured cervical spine into the permanent aggravation, does the Permanent Aggravation be appropriate?

Did these illegal criminal activities be appropriate that Ontario Ombudsman office staff did forge key important evidence and make the false statements of the material facts of the Case in their decisions?

Of course, the Ombudsman-he did support that his staff’s illegal criminal activities must be inappropriate!

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.4

“Subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinic documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker, any clinic documentation between February 2008 and June 2008……..LOE benefits are restored to the worker June 7, 2008 through to June 7, 2008. Once again Operations is instructed to secure any additional clinic documentation that may be available with the assistance of the worker to determine any continuation of LOE benefits.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision did state that: (Original) P.5

“Operations is instructed, with the assistance of the worker , to secure any clinical documentation between the worker’s return to Canada in February 2008 through to June 2008. Once again with the assistance of the worker Operations is to ensure that any documentation subsequent to June 11, 2008 through to the present time be submitted to the claim file record.”

 

The Decision had instructed that the WSIB staff involved in the case did return detained medical documentations to the Claim File to determine any continuation of LOE benefits, but they didn’t firmly carry out the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010.

 

On May 26, 2010, Ms. Duhamel, Nurse Consultant did carry out the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010. She had arranged that I attended an FRP, but the staff 1. Dicarlo had canceled the FRP dated June 7, 2010 for cover up their illegal criminal activities. The FRP was delayed to April 19, 2011.The Ms. Duhamel, Nurse Consultant had also been replaced by the staff 1. Dicarlo who again operated the forged claim file and did firmly not carry out the WSIB Final Decision. The Nurse consultant had arranged the FRP, but staff 1 canceled the FRP for covering up their conspiracies.

Evidence:

 

On May 20, 2010, Ms. Catherine, Case Manager did make a decision for carrying out the WSIB Final Decision, but the Ms. Catherine had also been replaced by the staff 1. Dicarlo.

 

On January 7, 2011, Mr. Hely, Case Manager did again made a decision for carrying out the WSIB Final Decision, but the Mr. Hely had also been replaced by the staff 4. Badovinac.

 

On August 8, 2011, Staff 4. Badovinac had forged all statements of the legal evidence, medical documentations, Medical Legal Report, the WSIB Final Decision, LifeMark Assessment Report and Discharge Report and forged the document#55 and again made the fifth fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011 in light of her forged document#55.

 

The WSIB staff involved in the case had told every investigator “there are not enough medical documentations to carry out the WSIB Final Decision in the Claim File”. The WSIB staff involved in the case had detained all medical documentations and had not recorded it to the Claim File. This was just the WSIB staff involved in the case made conspiracies and schemed trap “there are not enough medical documentations to carry out the WSIB Final Decision in the Claim File Record“. The ARO’s Decision had exposed that the WSIB corrupt group detained all medical documents in the Decision’s 4th page and 5th CONCLUSION. Please see the ARO’s Decision.

To be continued @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

On March 20, 2012, the staff 8. Phillips did also speak it “The WSIB Operations spoke the lack medical evidence to carry out the Decision”. Witness was the Translator specified by Ms. Phillips, she had noted these speaking in her computer that I requested.

 

(35). “and required that you have your physician to refer to you to the program in Vancouver. The Board also acknowledged that a nurse consultant eventually arranged the FRP for you in Vancouver,”

 .

Medical Legal report dated June 11, 2008 did state P.3

“..No appropriate treatment has been provided.”

“I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the ” functional restoration program .”

“I belive a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:

  1. 4-10 ” It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

In February 2011, I went to FRP Clinics in B.C. and requested doctors to arrange the FRP. After they did see the Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008, they didn’t accept my request. They told me that please the WSIB directly contact them because Doctors had clearly seen through the Defendants’s conspiracies and schemed trap.

 

Ms. Duhamel, Nurse Consultant had arranged the FRP of June 7, 2010 for carrying out the WSIB Final decision, but staff 1. Dicarlo had canceled it. If the FRP had been done at that time, the WSIB staff’s illegal criminal activities would have early been disclosed by the Fact and Evidence of the FRP.

 

Evidence of Caused Permanent Aggravation

Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P2-5

PAST HEALTH

” Past health has been good. He has not had any previous surgery and has not been hospitalized for any medical problems. He is not taking any medications and does not have a history of allergies. He smokes five or six cigarettes a day; does not drink.   E-12

 

P.3 “..No appropriate treatment has been provided.”

 

P.3 “I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the ” functional restoration program .”

 

P.3 “I belive a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 

  1. 4-10 “….The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

LifeMark Centre Assessment Report dated April 28, 2011

  1. 2-1 (in Emergency Centre) “…..A non-contrast CT scan of the head and neck was noted to be normal…….

His discharge diagnosis was that of:

A closed head injury with mental status changes.

Knee pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Back pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Neck pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.”

 

Diagnosis dated April 28, 2011: P5-3

“– Chronic headaches – which did not seem typical of a migraine.

— Dizziness

— Post concussion syndrome-the above 2 complaints could be part of a post concussion syndrome

— Chronic neck pain

— Deconditioned state

Medication Recommendations:

— Increase betahistine dosing to 24mg bid

— Taper benzodiazepine and consider initiation of a low dose TCA night to normalize sleep and aid in the management of chronic pain. To consider trazodone as it is least likely to exacerbate his dizziness

— For optimal use of acetaminophen, unilizing the slow release formulation.”

 

DISCHARGE REPORT of LIFEMAR CENTRE dated July 8, 2011

PROGRESS SUMMARY

 

MEDICAL SUMMARY  (Doctor and Pharmacist) P.2

………“Overall, Mr. Gao was well engaged in all aspects of the Program and was seen to have made good gains in the Pain Management Program. He has been advised to maintain his present mediation regimen and to continue to embrace the Pain Management Strategies which had been presented to him in the Program.”

 

“Mr. Gaos ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited range of motion of his neck remain barriers to safe driving.”

                                                      

PHYSICAL THERAPY SUMMARY  P.2

“Mr. Gao is now able to withstand one hour of continuous exercise without bringing on pain or symptoms. He no longer reports fatigue and has improved his overall strength. He is able to perform a squat but reports that deep squats sometimes bring on sensations of dizziness.

 

Cervical range of motion has continued to slowly improve (see below), and he is observed to engage the neck to a greater extent in normal movement patterns, although he continues to use trunk and body movement to compensate for lack of full range. He has been informed by his family doctor and remains fixated on the idea that the damage to the C4 vertebrae (subluxation of C4 on C5 by 1-2mm) is such that his neck will not improve further.

 

Cervical range of motion:

Flexion       Extension           Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake            10              20                  25/40               10/10

Discharge         30              30                  50/50               20/20

Normal values     80              50                  80/80               45/45

 

Gait velocity has improved to within normal limits, although Mr. Gao reports that he is not yet able to walk as fast as he did prior to his injury as he is afraid of crashing into people. He continues to work on his dynamic balance.

 

Mr. Gao has been encouraged to continue with his activation program at home and has already started to complete his exercise in his home setting.”

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL SUMMARY

Mr. Gao continued to show good motivation and participation in the physical portion of the program.

He continued to make small physical and functional gains and was pleased with his progress. Mr. Gao benefited greatly from the structure the program provide and the increased social contact it afforded. His overall demeanor and presentation in the Centre has improved significantly in that Mr. Gao is more open, contactful, communicative and outgoing.

 

In individual counselling sessions, Mr Gao continued to be genuine and forthright. He confirmed that his mood and many aspects of his overall quality of life have improved steadily while participating in the program. He noted that he was taking better care of himself by eating better, as well.

 

Unfortunately, discussions about his future have not gone well. Mr. Gao continues to be extremely fixated on his accident claim issues and feels no compelling need to move forward with his life.

Suggestions made regarding finding work so as to better his living situation are flatly dismissed as Mr. Gao asserts that his only interest is to ‘right the wrongs done to him’. Obsessed as he is with his ideas of fairness and ethics, Mr. Gao went so far as to say “if I die tomorrow, at least I will have been working to bring about justice”. Sadly, he does not seem able to compartmentalize his life in a healthy way, with the outcome that he virtually ignores all other aspects of his life, including his family. It is difficult to to be optimistic that Mr. Gao will move forward with his life, although one can hope that he will continue to work on improving his physical functioning.

 

Mr. Gao would not likely benefit from further psychological treatment at this time.

 

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPT SUMMARY

Mr. Gao actively participated in the functional component of this program which included lifting, carrying, pushing, and pulling. He was receptive to information regarding body mechanics and pacing and worked to incorporate learned strategies into his program. Mr. Gao continues to be limited by reports of pain in the posterior aspect of his neck and by headaches.

 

Mr Gao no longer has work available to him as a Truck Driver and does not have his Class I Driver’s Licence. Mr. Gao was provided with a local resource that may be able to assist him in vocational planning following the program.

 

Legend:

Frequency Description:

Constant: 66% – 100% of shift

Frequent: 33% – 66% of shift

Occasional: 5% – 33% of shift

Rare:      0% -5% of shift

Never:    Not required

 

Strength Capacity:

0-10 Ibs   Sedentary Strength

11-20 Ibs  Light Strength Level

20-50Ibs   medium Strength Level

50-100Ibs  Heavy Strength Leve.

>100Ibs    very Heavy Strength Level

 

Squatting:

Demonstrated ability: 20/60 seconds: full squat: reports dizziness when assuming and recovering from position

Reported Job Demands: Occasional basis

Job Match: yes

 

Waist to floor Lift:

Demonstrated Ability: 12Ibs

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to MEDIUM

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Waist to Overhead Lift:

Demonstrated Ability: 12Ibs

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic:

RARE/NONE basic:  up to MEDIUM

Job Match: no

 

Front Carrying:

Demonstrated Ability: 15Ibs over approximately 50 feet of even ground

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to MEDIUM

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Right Carrying:

Demonstrated Ability: 6 Ibs over approximately 50 feet of even ground

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to MEDIUM

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Left Carrying:

Demonstrated Ability: 6 Ibs over approximately 50 feet of even ground

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to HEAVY

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Pushing:

Demonstrated Ability: sustained light level force over 30 feet

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic:

RARE/NONE basic: up to MIDIUM

Job Match: no

 

Pulling:

Demonstrated Ability: sustained light level force over 30 feet

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic:

RARE/NONE basic: up to MIDIUM

Job Match: no

 

Reported Tolerances:

  1. Walking: demonstrated completing the morning group walk (approximately 40 minutes).

Reports he is limited in his speed of walking.

  1. Sitting: demonstrated sitting through the 45 minutes education classes in the clinic. Reports requiring neck support when sitting for extended periods of time: observed to lean against the wall with sitting in group sessions.

 

Mr. Gao continues to be limited by reported pain in the posterior aspect of his neck and in his temples bilaterally. He reports his dizziness has improved since beginning the program but continues to report increased dizziness with squatting. Mr. Gao continues to demonstrate functioning at a LIGHT strength level per the NOC and therefor does not demonstrate meeting the MEDIUM strength demands of his pre-injury work as a Truck Driver.

 

Mr. Gao’s limited neck range of motion and ongoing reports of dizziness may present safety concerns regarding returning to driving (i.e shoulder checks).

 

Mr. Gao has been provided with resources in the community that are available to assist him in the pursuit of possible vocational planning. He has not actively explored these resources at the time of discharge, maintaining he would like to pursue future vocational planning independently.

 

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK of the DISCHARGE REPORT Dated July 8, 2011

This was the Discharge Report’s last an item completed by the Team Members (Six Specialists). This also was the Six Specialists’ s Discharge Diagnosis Report.

E-14A

 

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK,

–  Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion-improving, but ongoing

         –  Decreased core stability and altered posture-improved

–  Decreased balance-improved

–  Headaches-improving, but ongoing

–  Dizziness-improving, but ongoing

–  Pain focused behavior-improving

–  Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion –improving

–  Decreased core stability and altered postureimproved

–  Decrease balance-static balance is improved; working on dynamic balance

–  Headache-improving

–  Dizziness-improving, but brought on by deep squats

–  Decreased functional capacities for lifting and carrying-ongoing

–  Class 1 driver’s licence has expired-ongoing

 

–  Need for improved pain and stress management to reduce reliance on rest, avoidance of

   activities and medication use-resolving

–           Low mood symptoms including agitation, irritability and low self-worth.resolving

–     Lack of confidence in ability to self-manage pain, stress and physical reactivation.-improving

 

PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

-It is recommended Mr. Gao incorporate learned pacing and body mechanics information into his future working and daily life

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options

 

Defendant Phillips’ s fraudulent decision P.2-5

(36). “Your submission indicate that you participated in the FRP program between April and June 2011 and that copies of the program reports were sent to the Board. Further to our inquiries with the Board, it determined that you had reached maximum medical recovery as of June 30, 2011 the date you completed the FRP. The board informed you of its decision in a letter dated September 20, 2011 and provided you with information on your right of appeal, and that you had until March 20, 2010 to let the Board know if you intend to appeal this decision. The Board advised that as of march 20,, it has not received your notice of objection..

 

(37). “Your submission indicate that you participated in the FRP program between April and June 2011 and that copies of the program reports were sent to the Board.

 

It was LifeMark Centre did fax these Reports to the WSIB in light of the WSIB Instructions.

I had also submitted the Reports to the staff 8. Phillips. Facts can be proved by the registered mail’s Receipts.

 

(38). “Further to our inquiries with the Board, it determined that you had reached maximum medical recovery as of June 30, 2011 the date you completed the FRP.

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010  CONCLUSION

P.5-6 “Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.

 

Please see the DISCHARGE REPORT of the LIFEMARK above P25-30

Firstly, my accusation with fact and legal evidence was that the WSIB staff’s illegal criminal activities had caused my cervical spine into permanent aggravation.

 

Secondly, the sentence of it determined that you had reached maximum medical recovery as of June 30, 2011 the date you completed the FRP. was made by Staff 4. Badovinac in her fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011.

 

Thirdly, I had very Clearly disclosed the staff 4. Badovinac’s false document#55 dated August 8, 2011 with the evidence and also disclosed her fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011 with the evidence, which did have also been submitted to the staff 8. Phillips.

 

I had accused that the staff 4. Badovinac did forge all Statements of the Legal Evidences and Medical Documents to have made the false document#55 dated August 8, 2011.In the staff 4. Badovinac’s letter dated November 15, 2011, the staff 4. Badovinac had also confirmed that she made the decision dated September 20, 2011 in light of the document#55 dated August 8, 2011.

 

The staff 4. Badovinac was afraid of all legal evidences and the Originals of these medical documents so she did make the false document#55 dated August 8, 2011.

I had submitted my accusations to the staff 8. Phillips with respect to the staff 4. Badovinac to make false document#55 and fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011 and also sent my accusation to the staff 4. Badovinac herself for reading.

 

  1. On September 15, 2011 I did send the fax 5 pages to the staff 8. Phillips

On October 2, 2011 I did send the registered mail 9 pages to the staff 8.

On November 2, 2011 I did send the fax p3 pages to the staff 8.

On November 9, 2011 I did send the fax 3 pages to the staff 8.

On November 29 I did send the fax 9 pages to the staff 8.

On December 11, 2011 I did send fax 4 pages to the staff 8.

On December 21, 2011 I did send fax P15 to the staff 8.

On January 9, 2012 I did send fax 16 pages to the staff 8.

 

In telephone of March 20, 2012, the staff 8. Phillips did loudly speak, Although they had made the illegal criminal activities, we can’t also fire them. The witness was the translator. I had requested her as the witness who told me she had recorded these in her computer. Her telephone is 204-254-3932; her name is Ama specified by the staff 8. Phillips. Staff 8. Phillips had clearly known the staff 4.Badovinac had made the false document#55 and fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011 in light of her false document#55. These evidences had submitted to the staff 8. Phillips.

 

(39). “The board informed you of its decision in a letter dated September 20, 2011

 

Facts and legal evidences had proved that the staff 4. Badovinac had illegally made the fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011, and I had also submitted the evidences to Staff 8. Phillips. However, the staff 8. Phillips did still make the statement as if it was genuine.

 

(40). “provided you with information on your right of appeal,

 

I did agree the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010. Why did I appeal it?

Staff 4.Badovinac did forge document#55 and made fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011according to her forged document#55. Why did I appeal it?

Just as the WSIB’s theory “You will have opportunity, when the decisions are reached, to challenge any decision that you remain dissatisfied with”.

As a result, when these injured workers have died, there have still been decisions to wait them for challenge. However, the WSIB Law s.121 is just a waste paper which doesn’t have a little of power than the WSIB staff’s super power, and it is as same as Ontario Ombudsman Act.

 

The WSIB FPC’s commissioner’s response

“It is open to you contacting Ontario Ombudsman Office……address…..telephone….”

 

Staff 8. Phillips’ s fraudulent decision P.2-6

(41). “During our march 20, 2012 conversation, we discussed that you were interested in appeal, and that you had until March 20, 2012 to let the Board know if you intend to appeal the Board’s decision and that you did not received a notice of objection form. We discussed that given that this date is the deadline to appeal, you may wish send the Board a fax to inform of your intention to appeal. As discussed, I contacted the case manager to relay your concern that you did not receive the notice of objection form, and to let her know of your intention.

 

(42). “During our march 20, 2012 conversation, we discussed that you were interested in appeal,

 

This was the frauds made by the staff 8. Phillips. Witness was the translator of Manitoba. The staff 8.Phillips was afraid of her frauds being known by Toronto people so she did connect Toronto to Manitoba again to connect to Vancouver. I had requested the translator as a witness who told me she had recorded these in her computer. Her telephone is 204-254-3932; her name is Ama specified by the staff 8. Phillips.

 

(43). “you had until March 20, 2012 to let the Board know if you intend to appeal the Board’s decision and that you did not received a notice of objection form. We discussed that given that this date is the deadline to appeal, you may wish send the Board a fax to inform of your intention to appeal. As discussed, I contacted the case manager to relay your concern that you did not receive the notice of objection form, and to let her know of your intention.

 

The Board’s decision was the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010. I did agree it. Why did I appeal it? Staff 4. Badovinac did forge document#55 and made fraudulent decision which did refuse

to carry out the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010. I had submitted her illegal criminal fact and evidence to the staff 8. Phillips in light of Ontario Ombudsman Act and the Instruction of the WSIB FPC. (Ontario WSIB Fair Practices Commission)

 

On August 3, 2011 the staff 8. Phillips did investigate the fraudulent case filed. She had clearly indicated to investigate the fraudulent case and also required me choice an Office between Ombudsman and Tribunal. I did tell her, “I choice the Ombudsman office in light of Ombudsman Act because the Tribunal does not deal with fraudulent case.”

 

The WSIB Fair Practices Commission’s Instruction dated March 21, 2011

“…..it is open to you to contact Ombudsman Ontario.

Their address is: ………..

Their toll-free telephone number is 1-800-263-1830.

 

Ontario Ombudsman Act.

Function of Ombudsman

  1. (1) The function of ombudsman is to investigate any decision or recommendation made or any act done or omitted in the course of the administration of a governmental organization and affecting any person or body of persons in his, her or its personal capacity. R.S.O. 1990, c, O. 6, s. 14 (1).

Investigation on complaint

The Ombudsman may made any such investigation on a complaint made to him or her by any person affected or by any member of the Assembly to whom a complaint is made by any person affected, or of the Ombudsman’s own motion. R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 6, s. 14 (2)

The Ombudsman Act has clearly indicated the Function of Ombudsman. but the Office did wilfully fail to comply with the Ontario Ombudsman Act.

 

Staff 8. Phillips’ s fraudulent decision P.3-1

(44). “We also discussed that as an office of last resort, your disagreement with the Board’s September 20, 2011 decision may be addressed through an appeal to the ARO. Once the appeals resolution process is exhausted, and should you remain dissatisfied with the outcome, you will have an additional right of appeal to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Tribunal (the Tribunal).

 

Ontario WSIB Fair Practices Commission’s Instruction dated March 21, 2011 “the Commission does not have the mandate or authority to investigate the Operations staff, as you are requesting …..it is open to you to contact Ombudsman Ontario.”

 

On July 6, 2011, I did submit my accusation to Ombudsman Ontario with respect to the WSIB the  fraudulent group has been making illegal criminal activities which had caused my injured cervical spine into the Permanent Aggravation.

On August 3, 2011, the staff 8. Phillips had investigated this fraudulent case filed and indicated to investigate the fraudulent case. After the staff 8. Phillips did wilfully delay nine months, she did inform me their office refused to investigate the fraudulent case.

 

Ombudsman Act

Function of Ombudsman

(1)  The function of ombudsman is to investigate any decision or recommendation made or any act done or omitted in the course of the administration of a governmental organization and affecting any person or body of persons in his, her or its personal capacity. R.S.O. 1990, c, O. 6, s. 14 (1).

Investigation on complaint

(2)  The Ombudsman may made any such investigation on a complaint made to him or her by any person affected or by any member of the Assembly to whom a complaint is made by any person affected, or of the Ombudsman’s own motion. R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 6, s. 14 (2).

Ombudsman Act has clearly indicated the Function of Ombudsman.

 

The staff 8. Phillips did, without lawful justification and excuse, wilfully resist Ontario Ombudsman Act.

The staff 8. Phillips did, without lawful justification and excuse, wilfuly refuse to comply with lawful requirement of the Ombudsman Act.

The staff 8. Phillips did wilfully forge key important evidence and make the false statements of the material facts of the case and mislead Investigators in her fraudulent decision.

 

The WSIB Fair Practices Commission’s Commissioner did respond that you should send the fraudulent case to Ontario Ombudsman.

 

Staff 8. Phillipss fraudulent decision P.3-2

(45). “Please note, our Office is not an appeal body. Rather, when reviewing Tribunal decisions, our Office determines whether the Tribunal has acted in according with the law, its decision is based on the evidence before it and its procedures were administratively fair.

 

(46). “Please note, our Office is not an appeal body.

 

I was not appeals, I was accusation the WSIB staff’s illegal criminal activities in light of Ontario Ombudsman Act and the instruction of the WSIB FPC. On July 6, 2011, I sent my accusation to this Ombudsman office with respect to the WSIB staff ‘s illegal criminal activities-Fact and Evidence 51 items.

My accusation was that the WSIB staff have been making the illegal criminal activities which had caused my cervical spine into permanent aggravation.

 

On August 3, 2011, the staff 8. Phillips had investigated this fraudulent case filed and indicated to investigate the fraudulent case and required me to choice a Office between Ombudsman and Tribunal. I clearly told her I did choose Ombudsman because Tribunal didn`t deal with fraudulent case. However, Staff 8. Phillips delayed Nine Months not to investigate these facts and evidences which had proved that the WSIB staff made illegal criminal activities. This office had severely violated Ontario Ombudsman Act and Canada Law.

 

(47). “Rather, when reviewing Tribunal decisions,”

 

I did agree the WSIB final decision dated May 7, 2010 and had told the staff 8. Phillips “the Tribunal doesn’t deal with fraudulent case on August 3, 2011.” the staff 8. Phillips should more clearly understand the procedure. Just as the WSIB FPC’s Instruction “…… it is open to you to contact Ontario Ombudsman……..”

In other words, the Ombudsman office did fail to comply with Ontario Ombudsman Act and Canada Law, what rights reviewing Tribunal decisions will this office have? Just as a corrupt officer does require reviewing a worker’s income.

 

(48). “our Office determines whether the Tribunal has acted in according with the law,”

 

Staff 8. Phillips should first determine her illegal criminal activities and second determine her to violate Ontario Ombudsman Act 14. (1)(2) and thirdly determine the Ombudsman to support her illegal criminal activities.

 

(49). “its decision is based on the evidence before it and its procedure were administratively fair.

 

Staff 8.Phillips did forge the case’s key important evidence dated September 28, 2007 and make the false statements of the material facts of the case in her fraudulent decision. Please the staff 8. Phillips answer why     did she forge important evidence dated September 28, 2007? what “administratively fair” was it which was the staff 8. Phillips did reject to carry out Ontario Ombudsman Act.?

 

This office did resist to carry out Ontario Ombudsman Act and wilfully make the false statements of material facts and wilfully forge key important evidence in their fraudulent decisions. They did wilfully refuse to investigate this fraudulent case and wilfully resist to comply with the Ontario Ombudsman Act.

 

Ombudsman Act

  1. Function of Ombudsman

(1)  The function of ombudsman is to investigate any decision or recommendation made or any act done or omitted in the course of the administration of a governmental organization and affecting any person or body of persons in his, her or its personal capacity. R.S.O. 1990, c, O. 6, s. 14 (1).

Investigation on complaint

(2)  The Ombudsman may made any such investigation on a complaint made to him or her by any person affected or by any member of the Assembly to whom a complaint is made by any person affected, or of the Ombudsman’s own motion. R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 6, s. 14 (2).

 

Just as Ontario WSIB Fair Practices Commission’s Instruction of March 21, 2011 “the Commission does not have the mandate or authority to investigate the Operations staff, as you are requesting …..it is open to you to contact Ombudsman Ontario.”

 

Staff 8. Phillips’ s fraudulent decision P.3-3

(50). “Based on the available documentation, it appears that the Board has responded the concerns you raised about the administrative handling of your file. Based on our conversation of March 20, 2012 you are intending to appeal the Board’s decision and therefore we will not be taking further action on your complaint. You may contact us again if you are dissatisfied the decision.

 

(51). “Based on the available documentation, it appears that the Board has responded the concerns you raised about the administrative handling of your file.

 

Based on the available documentation,” is just 5the staff5. Locke, staff6. Johnson and staff7. Gilkinson’s false response/decisions submitted to the Ombudsman on July 6, 2011, and my accusations with the evidences had also been submitted to the Ombudsman to these fraudulent responses on July 6, 2011.

In here, the staff8. Phillips had proved the WSIB’s staff5. Locke, staff6. Johnson and staff7. Gil kinson  had made the WSIB’s these documentations. In other words, the staff 8. Phillips had proved that they did forge the WSIB’s documentation. Please see the Lawsuit Fact – Evidence(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7).

 

(52). “Based on our conversation of March 20, 2012 you are intending to appeal the Board’s decision

 

Should the staff8. Phillips not forget the “Dispute” that She did shout “Although they had done the illegal criminal activities, and we could also not fire them” in this “conversation” of March 20, 2012. Why did I appeal the evil fraudulent decision? Why did I fall into the trap schemed – the WSIB’s theory “You will have opportunity, when the decisions are reached, to challenge any decision that you remain dissatisfied with”. As a result, when these injured workers have died, there have still been decisions to wait them for challenge.

 

The instruction of Ontario WSIB Fair Practices Commission dated March 21, 2011:

“The Commission does not have the mandate or authority to investigate the Operations staff, as you are requesting …..it is open to you to contact Ombudsman Ontario.”

 

After delaying nine months, on March 20, 2012 the staff8. Phillips did orally inform me her decision to refused to investigate the fraudulent case. She should inform me her decision in written in light of Ontario Ombudsman Act. She did reject, without lawful justification and excuse, to investigate this fraudulent case and she was afraid of a “decision in written” to be as a Evidence.

On March 20, 2012, after the staff8. Phillips did orally inform me her decision, .I had faxed my Objection with evidences with respect to the staff8. Phillips’s fraudulent oral decision to Ontario Ombudsman and Ontario MPPs.

 

(53). “therefore we will not be taking further action on your complaint. You may contact us again if you are dissatisfied the decision.

 

I had sent my Objections with the evidence to Ontario Ombudsman (N times) with respect with the staff8. Phillips’s the oral decision of March 20, 2012 and her fraudulent decision in written dated April 10, 2012. But the Ontario Ombudsman never answer a word.

 

Under Ontario Legislative Assembly MPPs’ s enquiring, this staff8. Phillips did painstakingly make the fraudulent decision which did forge key important evidence of the case dated September 28, 2007 and make the false statements of the material facts of the case.

 

The staff 8. Phillip had committed forgery who made a false investigation decision as a document which had been recorded in the Ombudsman file# 243042-001(WSIB), knowing it to be false, with the intent that any person should be induced, by the belief that are genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything. The staff 8. Phillips did not comply with the Law and Professional Ethics and Standard.

 

August 7, 2014                                              Plaintiff:    Tieguang Gao

56 thoughts on “(d). Ontario Ombudsman Office’s Phillip (ERO,8) forged evidence, publicly made jurisdictional errors against the Ombudsman Act..

  1. My husband and i felt now glad that Peter could conclude his inquiry through the ideas he obtained from your very own site. It’s not at all simplistic to simply possibly be giving away tips and hints which usually many people have been selling. And we all know we have got the blog owner to appreciate for that. The specific explanations you have made, the straightforward site menu, the friendships you will help to foster – it’s everything sensational, and it’s really assisting our son in addition to our family consider that the theme is amusing, and that is truly indispensable. Thanks for the whole thing!

  2. My husband and i were so fortunate when Chris could finish up his research from the ideas he made through your weblog. It is now and again perplexing just to be releasing secrets and techniques which usually many others may have been selling. We do know we’ve got the blog owner to give thanks to because of that. The illustrations you have made, the simple blog menu, the friendships you will help engender – it’s all overwhelming, and it is making our son in addition to our family consider that this content is thrilling, and that is wonderfully vital. Thank you for the whole thing!

  3. I must express my thanks to the writer just for bailing me out of this particular dilemma. As a result of surfing throughout the search engines and finding solutions that were not powerful, I believed my life was done. Existing minus the solutions to the problems you’ve resolved by way of your entire article content is a serious case, as well as the ones that would have badly affected my entire career if I hadn’t encountered your web site. That training and kindness in maneuvering all the pieces was valuable. I’m not sure what I would have done if I had not encountered such a point like this. It’s possible to now look forward to my future. Thanks for your time very much for the expert and results-oriented help. I won’t be reluctant to suggest your web site to any person who needs guidelines about this area.

  4. I have to show thanks to the writer just for rescuing me from this circumstance. Right after researching throughout the world-wide-web and getting opinions which are not pleasant, I believed my entire life was over. Living without the approaches to the problems you’ve solved all through this short post is a crucial case, as well as the ones which may have negatively affected my career if I had not discovered your web page. Your skills and kindness in handling all the stuff was priceless. I don’t know what I would have done if I had not come across such a thing like this. I am able to at this time look forward to my future. Thanks a lot so much for this high quality and effective guide. I won’t be reluctant to refer your web page to any individual who would need tips on this situation.

  5. I wish to show some appreciation to this writer just for bailing me out of such a dilemma. Right after browsing through the online world and getting views which were not powerful, I figured my entire life was gone. Living devoid of the solutions to the difficulties you’ve fixed through your main posting is a critical case, and the kind that would have in a negative way damaged my entire career if I had not encountered your site. That ability and kindness in touching a lot of stuff was tremendous. I don’t know what I would’ve done if I hadn’t encountered such a thing like this. I can at this point look forward to my future. Thanks for your time so much for the impressive and sensible help. I will not be reluctant to suggest your blog to any individual who ought to have guidance on this situation.

  6. I simply desired to thank you very much once more. I am not sure the things that I might have accomplished in the absence of the entire advice contributed by you on such a situation. It had been the troublesome setting in my position, however , noticing a new specialized strategy you treated the issue made me to cry with happiness. Extremely grateful for this help and then hope that you find out what a great job that you’re accomplishing educating many people through the use of your web blog. More than likely you’ve never come across all of us.

  7. I needed to put you one little bit of observation to help thank you very much the moment again for the unique solutions you have documented in this article. It was really shockingly generous with people like you to deliver unhampered all many individuals could possibly have distributed for an e-book in order to make some cash on their own, notably now that you could have tried it if you desired. These creative ideas likewise worked to be the great way to be certain that many people have a similar passion the same as my very own to find out much more with respect to this condition. I know there are some more fun opportunities up front for people who read your site.

  8. I not to mention my friends have been studying the great tips on the website then immediately developed a horrible suspicion I never thanked the website owner for those techniques. The young men ended up totally thrilled to study them and have really been taking pleasure in those things. Thanks for turning out to be indeed helpful and then for selecting this sort of wonderful useful guides millions of individuals are really wanting to learn about. Our honest regret for not saying thanks to you earlier.

  9. I have to point out my passion for your kindness in support of those individuals that really need help with that theme. Your very own commitment to getting the solution all around came to be particularly advantageous and have continually allowed folks much like me to achieve their endeavors. Your informative suggestions denotes a great deal to me and further more to my office workers. Thank you; from all of us.

  10. I precisely needed to say thanks again. I do not know what I might have created in the absence of these ideas shown by you concerning such question. It actually was a very troublesome condition in my circumstances, however , viewing a specialized form you solved the issue forced me to leap for gladness. Now i am grateful for your advice and even pray you really know what an amazing job your are providing educating most people through the use of a web site. Most likely you’ve never encountered any of us.

  11. I am also writing to make you be aware of what a remarkable discovery my cousin’s daughter enjoyed browsing your web site. She learned such a lot of details, which included how it is like to possess a wonderful helping nature to get certain people with ease learn selected complex things. You actually surpassed people’s expected results. I appreciate you for providing the informative, trusted, edifying and as well as cool thoughts on the topic to Sandra.

  12. Thanks for all your efforts on this blog. My mum really loves getting into research and it’s obvious why. I hear all relating to the compelling ways you produce powerful guides via your web blog and invigorate response from other people on this subject matter and my daughter has always been learning a great deal. Have fun with the rest of the new year. You are always conducting a tremendous job.

  13. Thank you for your own effort on this blog. Betty delights in engaging in research and it’s easy to see why. My spouse and i learn all concerning the lively way you make priceless information via this blog and as well boost response from some others on that issue plus our girl is in fact becoming educated a great deal. Have fun with the remaining portion of the new year. You’re the one doing a wonderful job.

  14. I want to express some appreciation to the writer just for rescuing me from this difficulty. After checking throughout the world wide web and finding advice which were not beneficial, I believed my entire life was gone. Existing without the presence of strategies to the problems you’ve solved through the report is a critical case, and ones that would have badly damaged my entire career if I hadn’t noticed your blog. The understanding and kindness in maneuvering every part was valuable. I am not sure what I would’ve done if I hadn’t encountered such a subject like this. I am able to at this time relish my future. Thanks for your time so much for this professional and results-oriented help. I won’t think twice to endorse your blog post to any individual who should have assistance on this issue.

  15. Thank you so much for providing individuals with an extremely wonderful chance to check tips from this site. It is always so beneficial and as well , packed with a good time for me and my office mates to visit your web site at the very least 3 times in 7 days to see the latest things you have. And lastly, I’m so always satisfied with the gorgeous tips you serve. Some two facts in this article are really the most efficient I’ve had.

  16. I not to mention my guys came looking at the great ideas on your site and then got a horrible suspicion I never thanked the site owner for those strategies. These young boys came for this reason very interested to study all of them and already have very much been enjoying these things. We appreciate you actually being indeed kind and for choosing these kinds of very good topics most people are really desirous to learn about. My honest regret for not expressing gratitude to earlier.

  17. I and also my guys happened to be taking note of the nice tactics on your web page while suddenly developed an awful feeling I never expressed respect to the web site owner for them. All the ladies were definitely for that reason passionate to read through them and already have actually been using them. I appreciate you for truly being quite kind and also for settling on varieties of important resources millions of individuals are really desirous to be aware of. My personal honest apologies for not saying thanks to you earlier.

  18. My wife and i were comfortable Louis could finish off his basic research through the entire precious recommendations he received when using the blog. It’s not at all simplistic just to happen to be giving away guidance which usually some others might have been making money from. We really do know we now have the website owner to be grateful to because of that. The specific explanations you have made, the simple website menu, the friendships your site aid to create – it’s everything remarkable, and it is leading our son and our family do think the subject is excellent, and that is especially pressing. Many thanks for all!

  19. I want to convey my passion for your kind-heartedness for those people who absolutely need assistance with this one topic. Your very own commitment to getting the solution around had become rather good and has permitted professionals like me to attain their ambitions. Your entire interesting facts implies a lot to me and further more to my mates. Thanks a lot; from everyone of us.

  20. I wish to point out my admiration for your generosity giving support to people who absolutely need assistance with that subject. Your special commitment to getting the message all-around came to be wonderfully practical and has really helped most people much like me to achieve their ambitions. Your amazing helpful instruction implies much to me and still more to my peers. With thanks; from everyone of us.

  21. I happen to be commenting to let you know of the magnificent encounter my friend’s daughter enjoyed reading through your web page. She realized some issues, most notably what it is like to possess a great coaching nature to get many more completely fully grasp some impossible topics. You undoubtedly did more than readers’ expectations. Thank you for offering those great, healthy, edifying and in addition unique tips on the topic to Gloria.

  22. I would like to express my admiration for your kind-heartedness in support of those who require help on this study. Your real dedication to passing the message up and down became unbelievably interesting and have frequently permitted guys much like me to achieve their targets. Your personal invaluable publication implies a whole lot to me and somewhat more to my fellow workers. Best wishes; from everyone of us.

  23. My husband and i ended up being absolutely happy when Edward managed to conclude his reports through the entire ideas he grabbed when using the web site. It is now and again perplexing to just happen to be handing out guidance that many people today could have been making money from. And we all fully grasp we’ve got you to give thanks to for this. All of the illustrations you have made, the straightforward site menu, the relationships you help create – it’s many incredible, and it is helping our son in addition to our family know that the subject is interesting, and that’s tremendously serious. Thanks for the whole lot!

  24. I needed to write you one little note in order to thank you over again about the superb advice you have contributed in this case. It was certainly seriously open-handed of people like you to grant openly just what numerous people might have marketed for an electronic book in order to make some cash on their own, principally now that you could possibly have tried it if you decided. The tips likewise served to become a great way to understand that some people have similar interest much like my personal own to know a lot more pertaining to this problem. I’m certain there are thousands of more fun instances in the future for folks who read through your site.

  25. I’m commenting to make you be aware of of the perfect experience my child encountered using your web site. She realized a good number of pieces, not to mention how it is like to have an awesome giving nature to let other people clearly grasp certain problematic subject areas. You really did more than visitors’ expectations. Thank you for coming up with these valuable, safe, revealing and also unique guidance on that topic to Emily.

  26. I wanted to post you the very small word to help say thanks yet again on your fantastic pointers you have contributed on this site. It is extremely open-handed of people like you giving without restraint all many individuals might have sold as an ebook to help make some profit for their own end, especially given that you might well have done it in the event you decided. These creative ideas in addition worked as a great way to know that some people have the identical fervor just like mine to figure out a great deal more with regard to this condition. I’m certain there are thousands of more enjoyable moments in the future for individuals who discover your blog.

  27. I together with my pals were found to be following the best tactics located on your site while immediately developed an awful suspicion I had not expressed respect to the web blog owner for those tips. Most of the men appeared to be totally very interested to see all of them and have in effect undoubtedly been tapping into them. Appreciation for being so thoughtful as well as for obtaining this sort of outstanding guides most people are really eager to be informed on. Our own sincere apologies for not expressing gratitude to earlier.

  28. I simply wanted to develop a comment to be able to express gratitude to you for all of the lovely tips you are sharing on this website. My considerable internet investigation has now been honored with wonderful facts to write about with my friends and family. I would declare that we readers actually are undoubtedly fortunate to exist in a good website with so many perfect professionals with good pointers. I feel extremely lucky to have come across your entire website page and look forward to some more fabulous minutes reading here. Thanks once more for everything.

  29. I as well as my guys ended up digesting the best tricks on your web site and quickly I got an awful feeling I had not expressed respect to you for those strategies. All the young boys ended up certainly warmed to learn them and have now truly been having fun with these things. I appreciate you for truly being simply accommodating and for obtaining these kinds of helpful themes most people are really needing to be aware of. Our sincere apologies for not expressing appreciation to you sooner.

  30. Needed to compose you that little word to say thanks again with your marvelous views you have shared here. This has been simply seriously generous with people like you to provide freely what many people could possibly have distributed as an ebook to help with making some cash for themselves, specifically now that you could have done it in case you considered necessary. The creative ideas also acted to provide a good way to be certain that other people have the same eagerness much like mine to find out somewhat more related to this matter. I’m sure there are some more pleasant opportunities ahead for people who take a look at your site.

  31. I’m writing to make you know of the great encounter my friend’s girl developed studying the blog. She came to understand plenty of issues, including what it is like to possess an ideal giving spirit to make other individuals just completely grasp various hard to do subject matter. You actually did more than our own desires. Thank you for displaying those great, dependable, explanatory and in addition fun thoughts on your topic to Janet.

  32. I together with my pals happened to be reading through the great techniques found on your web blog and so quickly got a horrible suspicion I never expressed respect to the blog owner for those techniques. My men were consequently joyful to see all of them and now have truly been having fun with these things. I appreciate you for actually being very helpful and also for choosing varieties of awesome information millions of individuals are really desperate to be aware of. Our sincere regret for not expressing gratitude to you sooner.

  33. I not to mention my buddies were found to be taking note of the good helpful hints from the website while all of the sudden I had an awful feeling I never expressed respect to the web site owner for those tips. All the young boys were totally thrilled to study all of them and have in effect clearly been enjoying those things. Appreciate your turning out to be well considerate as well as for deciding upon variety of incredible topics millions of individuals are really desperate to learn about. Our sincere regret for not saying thanks to you earlier.

  34. Needed to put you the very small observation to help say thank you yet again for the stunning suggestions you’ve documented in this case. It has been open-handed of people like you to convey freely all that a number of people could possibly have offered for sale for an ebook to help make some money for themselves, most importantly since you could have done it in case you considered necessary. The tips likewise served to become a great way to know that some people have similar zeal similar to my own to know great deal more with regards to this problem. I believe there are several more pleasant times in the future for those who looked over your site.

  35. I wanted to write you this very little remark to help thank you so much once again considering the great tips you’ve provided at this time. It was so seriously open-handed of you giving easily all that most people might have made available as an e book to help make some cash for their own end, most importantly given that you could have done it in case you decided. The advice in addition served like the great way to understand that the rest have the identical eagerness similar to my very own to learn way more in respect of this matter. I am sure there are some more pleasurable sessions up front for folks who read your blog.

  36. I’m just commenting to make you understand what a fine discovery my wife’s child obtained reading through your web site. She figured out lots of issues, including how it is like to possess an excellent teaching mood to make other folks very easily comprehend some hard to do subject areas. You truly surpassed our own expectations. I appreciate you for providing those warm and friendly, dependable, explanatory not to mention fun guidance on this topic to Gloria.

  37. My spouse and i ended up being so comfortable Jordan could round up his preliminary research while using the precious recommendations he gained through your web pages. It’s not at all simplistic to just continually be making a gift of methods that many some other people may have been trying to sell. And we do know we’ve got the writer to be grateful to for this. All the illustrations you have made, the straightforward website navigation, the friendships your site assist to engender – it’s got most superb, and it’s really aiding our son in addition to the family consider that this idea is thrilling, which is certainly really pressing. Many thanks for the whole lot!

  38. I precisely had to thank you so much once again. I’m not certain the things that I could possibly have undertaken without these methods documented by you about such subject. It previously was a real scary issue in my opinion, nevertheless looking at this expert technique you managed that made me to cry over happiness. I will be happy for your support and thus have high hopes you comprehend what an amazing job that you are doing instructing the others via your webblog. I’m certain you have never come across all of us.

  39. I must show some thanks to you for bailing me out of such a trouble. Because of surfing around throughout the internet and getting principles that were not helpful, I was thinking my entire life was well over. Being alive devoid of the solutions to the difficulties you have sorted out all through your entire website is a critical case, and ones which might have badly affected my entire career if I had not discovered your site. Your good mastery and kindness in maneuvering a lot of stuff was very useful. I’m not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t discovered such a subject like this. It’s possible to at this time look forward to my future. Thanks so much for the high quality and sensible help. I will not hesitate to recommend your web site to anybody who would need recommendations about this matter.

  40. Thank you a lot for providing individuals with remarkably remarkable opportunity to read critical reviews from this web site. It is usually so amazing and as well , full of amusement for me and my office peers to visit your blog at least 3 times in 7 days to study the latest items you will have. And of course, I am certainly astounded for the stunning principles you serve. Selected 4 ideas in this post are undeniably the most effective I have had.

  41. I must express my thanks to you just for bailing me out of this instance. After browsing throughout the online world and coming across principles that were not beneficial, I was thinking my life was done. Living minus the approaches to the issues you’ve fixed all through your entire short post is a crucial case, as well as ones that could have negatively affected my career if I hadn’t encountered the website. Your good training and kindness in controlling the whole lot was very useful. I’m not sure what I would’ve done if I hadn’t come upon such a solution like this. I am able to at this moment look ahead to my future. Thanks so much for your professional and effective help. I won’t hesitate to suggest the blog to any individual who desires direction about this issue.

  42. Thank you a lot for providing individuals with remarkably splendid chance to read from this website. It really is so beneficial and as well , jam-packed with a good time for me and my office co-workers to visit your blog a minimum of 3 times per week to read the new secrets you have got. And indeed, we are usually fascinated for the superb things you serve. Certain 1 areas on this page are essentially the most efficient we have all ever had.

  43. My husband and i felt very happy that Jordan could complete his researching through the entire precious recommendations he received through the weblog. It’s not at all simplistic to just find yourself giving for free ideas which usually many people could have been trying to sell. So we figure out we have got the website owner to appreciate for that. The specific explanations you made, the straightforward blog navigation, the friendships you assist to engender – it’s got most terrific, and it’s really facilitating our son and the family believe that this situation is amusing, and that is quite indispensable. Thank you for everything!

  44. I want to voice my love for your kind-heartedness for persons who absolutely need assistance with this particular concept. Your personal commitment to getting the message across came to be surprisingly significant and has empowered ladies like me to arrive at their endeavors. Your amazing insightful help signifies a great deal a person like me and somewhat more to my office colleagues. Warm regards; from each one of us.

  45. I am also commenting to make you understand what a wonderful experience my princess undergone browsing your blog. She mastered plenty of details, which include what it is like to possess a wonderful giving style to make folks with no trouble know chosen advanced subject matter. You really did more than my expectations. Many thanks for displaying such important, trustworthy, revealing not to mention fun tips about the topic to Sandra.

  46. I am just commenting to make you be aware of of the fantastic discovery my friend’s daughter went through checking your webblog. She mastered such a lot of pieces, which include what it’s like to have a wonderful coaching heart to get other individuals without problems learn chosen multifaceted subject areas. You truly surpassed readers’ expectations. Many thanks for presenting these valuable, dependable, explanatory and even unique tips on the topic to Janet.

  47. I together with my pals were found to be checking the nice strategies found on your site while quickly I had a terrible feeling I never thanked the web blog owner for them. These men came absolutely happy to see all of them and have now definitely been having fun with them. Many thanks for indeed being quite accommodating and for picking out certain quality useful guides most people are really eager to discover. Our own sincere apologies for not expressing gratitude to earlier.

  48. I as well as my buddies have already been going through the good helpful tips located on your web page and so at once got a horrible feeling I never thanked the web site owner for those secrets. These young boys were definitely joyful to study all of them and already have without a doubt been using these things. Thanks for turning out to be really considerate as well as for making a decision on such beneficial tips millions of individuals are really desirous to be aware of. My very own sincere regret for not expressing gratitude to you earlier.

  49. The following time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I imply, I know it was my option to learn, but I actually thought youd have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could possibly fix when you werent too busy on the lookout for attention.

  50. Thank you a lot for providing individuals with an extraordinarily spectacular chance to discover important secrets from this website. It is usually very good and as well , stuffed with a lot of fun for me and my office colleagues to search your web site the equivalent of three times in 7 days to study the fresh issues you will have. And of course, we are always fascinated concerning the fabulous points you give. Some two areas in this posting are in truth the simplest I’ve ever had.

  51. I not to mention my pals ended up reviewing the excellent advice on your web blog and so suddenly got an awful suspicion I had not thanked the web site owner for those strategies. All of the people ended up certainly glad to see all of them and have absolutely been taking pleasure in them. I appreciate you for genuinely so kind and then for settling on this sort of high-quality resources millions of individuals are really desirous to know about. Our honest apologies for not saying thanks to you sooner.

  52. I am also writing to let you know what a excellent discovery my friend’s girl experienced reading through your web site. She figured out several things, which included what it is like to have an awesome helping nature to let others quite simply know just exactly selected tortuous subject areas. You truly surpassed readers’ expected results. Many thanks for offering such priceless, trusted, informative and as well as unique thoughts on this topic to Gloria.

  53. Thanks so much for providing individuals with a very breathtaking possiblity to read critical reviews from this blog. It’s usually so fantastic and as well , stuffed with a good time for me and my office peers to visit the blog at the very least thrice in 7 days to see the newest items you will have. Of course, I’m also actually pleased with the good ideas you serve. Selected 3 points on this page are rather the very best we have all had.

  54. Nevertheless, it’s all carried out with tongues rooted solidly in cheeks, and everybody has got nothing but absolutely love for their friendly neighborhood scapegoat. In reality, he is not merely a pushover. He is simply that extraordinary breed of person solid enough to take all that good natured ribbing for what it really is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *