393 University Ave.Toronto Court File No: CV-14-501847
ON M5G 1E6, 10th Floor
Manager, Joseph Doria
Fax: 4163275484 October 7, 2014
Manager, Joseph Doria Toronto Courthouse, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
This letter serves as the formal notice of my intent to file a lawsuit against your illegal criminal action in the court in respect of making frauds and intentional cancellation of the legal motion of 2014-10-30 for covering up the defendants’s illegally criminal activities including you and preventing from me exposing these illegal criminal activities at the legal motion (hearing)of 2014-10-30. I do expose these criminal activities’s faxes and email of October 2, 3 and 6, 2014 had been sent to all MPP of Ontario Legislative Assembly and the Organizations who may prove you clearly knew this frauds occurred at the Court.
Evidence is that you colluded with the Canada appointed judge Myers and two defendants, you fabricated facts and law, forged court document 2014ONSC6497, framed up the plaintiff, your 4 evil email.
 The defendants did collude with the court’s the registrars and you, and you detained my originating documents. On April 9, 2014, I went to the court office in person obtaining my Form 14 A of Statement of Claim issued by the court. On April 18, 2014, I served it to the two defendants. On April 25, 2014, I mailed the issued Form 14A’s originating documents (concise material facts, detail and particulars) to the court office pursuant to the Rules 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8), but the registrars rejected the originating documents to my file. On the defendants’s Motion hearing of August 26, 2014, the judge Allen spoke to all persons “your file is empty”. Evidences are PostCanada registered receipt, the court received the mail’s signature, the registrar’s signature rejecting my originating documents to my file. Above made the defendants’s the fraudulent motion into success. Attached Evidence 1. registered mail receipt and the court signature
 First defendant, Ontario WSIB Lawyer Eric Kupka had admitted all allegations of Statement of Claim issued on April 9, 2014 and given the advise “Should you proceed to obtain in default judgment.” Please see his letter dated April 29, 2014. After second defendant-the Ombudsman office colluded with the registrars and you, the lawyer also participated in the frauds occurred at the court. Evidence 2. the lawyer’s letter
 Second defendant, the ombudsman office did commit forgery (the office did forge the Court Document dated April 9, 2014 and was filed to the Court). Please don’t destroy it from the file because the Plaintiff has its copy signed by the office’s lawyer, Sara Gottlieb. As a lawyer, she should know the court issues Form 14A’s basic four elements. The person commits forgery who makes a false document, knowing it to be false, with intent that it should in any way be used or acted on as genuine, to the prejudice of any one whether within Canada or not…..
Attached Evidence 3. the forgery of court document
 Every one is a party to an offence who actually commits it; does or omits to do anything for the purpose of aiding any person to commit it; or abets any person in committing it. After the defendants colluded with the registrar and you, they openly make frauds in their defences and the motion (because the registrars and you had made the Plaintiff’s file into Empty, the defendants openly made frauds during the hearing of the Court. The defendants did FORGE DOCUMENTS and make the case’s FALSE STATEMENTS OF MATERIAL FACTS and made frauds under the registrars and you evil help during the hearing of August 26, 2014. Evidence: Judge Allen’s decision and the court’s signature receiving my originating documents submitted to the court pursuant to the Rule 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8).
 Judge Allen’s decision exposed two defendants made frauds including you and the registrars at the superior court;
- The Decision of motion of 2014/08/26’s ’s 2th “The WSIB allowed benefits with which the plaintiff was not satisfied.”
Fact was my employer colluded with the WSIB, and they detained my Claim Form6, then the WSIB rejected providing the WSIB with legal jurisdiction pertaining to the Claim and Treatment. Evidence: the site (1)-the WSIB Final Decision.
- B. ’s 3th “He appealed the WSIB decision by way of an internal WSIB administrative appeal……The plaintiff did not agree with the decision.”
Fact was I did agree with the WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 but the WSIB didn’t firmly carry out the Decision. Evidence is the WSIAT’s letter dated November 18, 2010 “It appears from your comments on your Notice Appeal Form you are satisfied with the ARO decision of May 7, 2010, and are dissatisfied with the implementation or carrying out of the decision by WSIB Operations.” please see it underlined parts. Attached evidence 4. the WSIAT’s letter
- ’s 2th “The statement of claim is sparsely and vaguely worded.”
Fact was the defendants colluded with the registrar and you, and you detained the plaintiff’s originating documents which are the Form 14 A‘s originating documents, concise statements of material facts and details-particulars mailed to the Court office on April 25, 2014 pursuant to the Rules 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8). Please see Evidence 1.
- ’s 3th “The claim states that it is “for Tort” and alleges that the defendants reject to carry out Medical Legal Report, forge medical documents, make illegal activities.”
Fact was the defendants colluded with the registrar and you, and you detained the plaintiff’s originating documents which are the Form 14A‘s originating documents, concise statements of material facts and detail and particulars mailed to the Court office on April 25, 2014 pursuant to the Rules 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8). Please see above Evidence 1. and detail and particulars 1-9, Evidence 61 items in the file.
- CONCLUSION: ’s 3th “There is such a deficiency of detail and particulars in the claim, there would be no reasonable chance of success at trial.”
Fact was the defendants colluded with the registrar and you, and you detained the plaintiff’s originating documents which are the Form 14 A‘s originating documents, concise statements of material facts and detail- particulars mailed to the Court office on April 25, 2014 pursuant to the Rules 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8). Please see above Evidence 1. and detail and particulars 1-9, Evidence 61 items in the file.
 On September 16, 2014, I went to the court office in person for payment the Motion of October 30, at 10:00 2014, and the court office had sealed on the Form of the Motion of October 30, 2014, and I submitted in person the Motion Documents to registrar of the court counter. These Documents are the motion record, factum, detail and particulars 1-9, evidence 61 items. Evidence is the seal of the court on the Form.
 The defendants failed to deliver their fraudulent defences with the prescribed time, the plaintiff may, on filling proof of service of the statement of claim, require the registrar to note the defendants in default pursuant to the Rules 19.01 (1). However, the registrar rejected my request noting the defendants in default. Evidence is the registrar’s signature and her statement.
 Toronto Court Manager Joseph Doria, you did cancel this legal Motion of October 30, 2014 and deprive my citizen entitlement and rights for covering up all illegal criminal activities occurred at the court and the two defendants’s illegal criminal activities from 2007 through to today 2014. Evidence is your 4 email.
 You should compensate these money to me including VISA’s interest which is direct spending. My payment for the Motion is that September 15-17’s airplane tickets and accommodation $ 1400 (go there and back), October 30, 2014’s airplane tickets $ 840 paid for the Motion (go there and back) all payment by VISA, and law consultant cost and your illegal action has caused my injured body being again aggravated. This is also including all indirect compensations. My Motion of October 30, 2014 had been authorized and sealed by the Court on September 16, 2014, but you cancelled the Legal Motion is yourself behaviour and interest. Your this illegal action is guilty-Obstruction of Justice.
 If you hope to resolve the question without court action and other, I will expect you to correct and restore the legal Motion of October 30, 2014 within Three (3) days of receipt of this Formal Notice. I may be reached by e-mail and letter. If I do not hear from you, I will initiate a lawsuit and other actions.
- To Mail the originating document’s receipt dated April 25, 2014and signature
- First defendant’s lawyer letter- “Should you proceed to obtain in default judgment.”
- Second defendant did forge the Court Document which was filed in the Court.
- The WSIAT’s letter which proves the defendants deceived the Judge during hearing.
Your prompt attention is appreciated,
Plaintiff: Tieguang Gao
This is a registered and signed letter