(5). Toronto Courthouse Office Manager Made False Response Protecting crimes occurred at Toronto Court

跟踪 ID
UA-87720748-1

COURT FILE NO.: CV-14-501847

                                                 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE-ONTARIO

 BETWEEN                 Tieguang Gao, Plaintiff

AND:

Ontario WSIB and Ontario Ombudsman Office, Defendants

 

Expose Toronto courthouse staffs colluded with the two defendants making illegal criminal activities, but this courthouse office manager made false response protecting these frauds made by this courthouse staffs.

 

Ministry of the Attorney General

Manager, Court Operations

Civil and Family

393 University Ave Toronto

M5G 1E6

Fax: 416-326-8091

Court File: CV-14-501847

241-258 Pender ST E Vancouver

BC V6A1T7; Paintiff: Tieguang Gao

February 8, 2015

 

 

Honourable Barbara Krever, Manager, Ontario Court Operations

Thank you for your letter dated January 9, 2015. My MEMO has indicated that I had submitted the frauds matter’s particulars and evidences occurred at the court to the Office on November 6, 2014 and on December 5, 2014 pursuant to the instruction of Canada Judicial Council.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CANADA

Laws help to ensure a safe and peaceful society in which people’s rights are respected. The Canada legal system respects individual rights, while at the same time ensuring that our society operates in an orderly manner. An essential principle is that the same law applies to everybody, including police, governments and public officials, who must carry out their public duties according to the law.

Your letter of January 9, 2015 did state “All complaints regarding court staff are taken very seriously and investigated accordingly….”.

Your letter doesn’t give any investigation result to my two complaints submitted to the Office in respect of the court staff and the supervisor, Joseph Doria’s illegal activities occurred at the court.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CANADA

Laws are also aimed at ensuring fairness. By recognizing and protecting basic individual rights and freedoms, such as liberty and equality, our laws ensure that stronger groups and individuals do not use their powerful positions to take unfair advantage of weaker groups or people.

Your letter did state I assure you all processes were followed correctly…

Please see evidences which do prove all processes were followed illegally.

[1]     On April 9, 2014, I went to the court in person submission my Claim, and my Claim was approved and issued. On April 18 and 21, 2014, I sent my Claim issued and the case’s concise statements of material facts to the two defendants, Ontario WSIB and Ontario ombudsman office.

 

[2]     The court registrar did reject my request to note the two defendants in default pursuant to the Rules 19. 01 (1) of Courts of Justice Act – R.R.O.1990, Reg.194.

 

Courts of Justice Act – R.R.O.1990, Reg.194

4.05 (4)     Any document, other than one that is to be issued, may be filed by leaving it in the proper court office or mailing it to the proper court office, accompanied by the prescribed fee. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. r. 4.05 (4).

 

[3]     On April 25, 2014, I mailed the originating process documents of the Statement of Claim issued (Particulars and evidences 350 pages, weight 1.316 kg) to the court office, and the court office staff had signed to receive the mail dated April 25, 2014 which was the originating process documents of the Statement of Claim issued. The mail was  submitted by registered mail pursuant to 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8) of Courts of Justice Act – R.R.O.1990, Reg.194.

The originating process documents of the Statement of Claim issued (Particulars and evidences 350 pages, weight 1.316 kg) were detained by the court office staff. Attached the mail receipt and the court office staff’s signature-3pages. Evidence 1. The mail receipt of April 25, 2014 and the court office staff’s signature 3 pages.

 

[4]    Both Particulars 142pages and evidence 200 pages were submitted to the court office by two times’ registered mails  on April 25, 2014, on  August 13, 2014 pursuant to 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8) of Courts of Justice Act – R.R.O.1990, Reg.194. The two mails were all detained by the court office staff. On September 16, 2014, I again went to in person the court office submission these originating process documents-particulars 142 pages, evidences 200 pages. Evidence 2. The mail receipt of August 13, 2014 and the court office staff’s signature 3 pages.

 

[5]     The court office staffs did two times detain my originating process documents (particulars 142 pages, evidences 200 pages) submitted pursuant to 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8) of Courts of Justice Act – R.R.O.1990, Reg.194. The court office staffs’ illegal activities had led to the evil conspiracy occurred at the court obtaining success which were made by the court staffs and the two defendants who did collude with each other and help for themselves benefits and interests.

[6]     Honourable Justice Allen did speak to all people “The plaintiff’s file is empty, the registrars don’t put the plaintiff’s originating process documents in this Claim File” at the hearing of August 26, 2014.

Honourable Justice Allen’s conclusion was “…There is such a deficiency of detail and particulars in the claim, there would be no reasonable chance of success at trial.”

Just because the court staffs’ illegal activities detaining my originating process documents, both the staffs and the two defendants’ evil conspiracy did obtain success at the hearing of August 26, 2014.

Honourable Justice Allen’s this conclusion was tampered with by Justice Myers in his endorsement dated October 20, 2014 which will be resolved in another case. These illegal activities stated above were a less part of this frauds matter occurred at the court office that these illegal activities were most easy recognized by the evidences.

 

[7]     This was a false investigating result was submitted to the Administration Office so it should write “I assure you all processes were followed illegally….”. Investigation this illegal matter occurred at this court is this Administration Office’s responsibility pursuant to the instruction of Canada Judicial Council.

 

[8]     Ontario WSIB lawyer Mr. Eric Kupka had admitted my all accusation in the concise statements of material facts. He did point out “Should you proceed to obtain default judgment”. Attached his admission letter dated April 29, 2014, 1 page.

 

Just as DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CANADA does point out “…An essential principle is that the same law applies to everybody, including police, governments and public officials, who must carry out their public duties according to the law.”

 

“Laws are also aimed at ensuring fairness. By recognizing and protecting basic individual rights and freedoms, such as liberty and equality, our laws ensure that stronger groups and individuals do not use their powerful positions to take unfair advantage of weaker groups or people.”

 

Office of the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario did point out “…..these matters that are the responsibility of arm’s length agencies of the government of Ontario.  I trust you will find resolution to your situation.”

 

The executive accountability system including court staff does violate regulation/rules and collude with other person to handle case; violation fact, law and procedure stipulation lead to judgment error.

 

I hope that this illegal matter occurred at the court does be resolved at the Administration Office pursuant to the instruction of Canada Judicial Council. Attached evidence 8 pages.

To be continued.

 

Sincerely,

 

Plaintiff: Tieguang Gao

tie6666@live.cn

www.disclosedarkforce.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 thoughts on “(5). Toronto Courthouse Office Manager Made False Response Protecting crimes occurred at Toronto Court

  1. Its like уou rad my mind! You aрpear to know a lot ɑbout this, like ʏou wrote the book іn іt or ѕomething.
    ӏ think that ʏou сan do with some pics to drive tһе messaage
    һome a littⅼe bit, but instead of that,
    tҺis is excellent blog. A fantaastic read. I wilⅼ ϲertainly bee Ƅack.

  2. Ηi! Would yoս ind if I share youг blog wіth myy zynga ɡroup?

    There’s a lot of people thɑt I think wouⅼd realⅼʏ appreϲiate our
    contеnt. Pleasse ⅼеt me know. Cheers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *