Following is notes not be checked.
COURT FILE NO.: CV-14-501847
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, ONTARIO
BETWEEN Tieguang Gao, Plaintiff
Ontario WSIB and Ontario Ombudsman Office, Defendants
Prove the supervisor Doria detaining documents and making frauds
On April 9, 2014, the court office issued my Statement of Claim. I mailed the Claim’s originating process documents details and particulars (fact 1-9 142 pages, evidence-61 items 200 pages, weight 1.316kg) to the court office pursuant to the Rules 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8) by registered mail on April 25, 2014. On October 29, 2014 the court staff had signed receipt of the mail. please see the evidence:
Rules 4.05 (4) Any document , other than one that is to be issued, may be filed by leaving it in the proper court office or mailing it to the proper court office, accompanied by the prescribed fee. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 4.05(4).
Fraud: the intentional use of deceit, a trick or some dishonest means to deprive another of his/ her/ its money, property or a legal right. A party who has lost something due to fraud is entitled to file a lawsuit for damages against the party acting fraudulently, and the damages may include punitive damages as a punishment or public example due to the malicious nature of the fraud.
Ontario superior court Doria had two times canceled the plaintiff’s legal Motion of October 30, 2014 sealed and approved by the court. First time, he, without lawful justification or excuse, had willfully canceled the Legal Motion of October 30, 2014 for covering up the two defendants’ illegal criminal activities occurred at the court and until the court. When the plaintiff submitted accusing his crimes to him and required him payment costs spent for the Motion, the Motion was restored. Second time, the court Doria and the registrars colluded with federal appointed judge Myers, fabricated facts and law, framed up the plaintiff. The court Doria again canceled the Legal Motion of October 30, 2014 for concealing their open crimes.
To be continued.