This is Canada Supreme Corrupt Officers Group who did colluded with each other, in common interest, forged evidences, documents and court documents, made the case’s false statements of the material facts, made frauds, framed up injured worker (plaintiff) for their personal gain from 2007 beginning to today….. Details and particulars please see www. disclosedarkforce.com
COURT FILE NO.: CV-14-501847
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, ONTARIO
BETWEEN Tieguang Gao, Plaintiff
Ontario WSIB and Ontario Ombudsman Office, Defendants
To Prove Ontario Ombudsman Office Does Forge The Court Document
Second defendant, Ontario Ombudsman Office did forge the court document for framing up plaintiff (Statement of Claim issued by the court) dated April 9, 2014. This forgery did not have this court seal and the registrar signature, and these words on it were duplicated by the defendant.
Following is this court’s genuine document. These words were written by the court registrar.
On April 18, 21, 2014, this document with concise statements of material facts was faxed to second defendant, the Ombudsman Office’s official fax number: 416-586-3485. following is the fax’s evidence.
The two defendants colluded with the court Manager Doria and registrars, and the Manager Doria and registrars evilly detained the plaintiff’s all originating documents submitted to the court pursuant to the Rules 4.05 (4); 25.06 (8). On the two defendants’ Motion hearing of August 26, 2014, the Judge Allen spoke to me “your file is empty”. Evidences are PostCanada registered receipts, the Court staff’s signature. Above caused the two defendants’ fraudulent motion into success under the court Manager Doria and registrars evil help. They made the case’s false statements of material facts at the hearing of August 26, 2014 under the court Manager Doria and staffs’ evil help.
The Decision of hearing of August 26, 2014 had proved that the two defendants made frauds at Ontario superior court
The court document 2014 ONSC 4962 exposed the court Doria and registrars colluded with two defendants, detained plaintiff ‘s all documents, made frauds at Ontario superior court (details please see the Manager Doria’s crimes )
For example, quote the document’s  2th, 3th and 6th
’s 2th “The WSIB allowed benefits with which the plaintiff was not satisfied.”
Fact was the WSIB leaders colluded with my employer, detained my Claim Form6,(please see (1) part) then the WSIB rejected providing the WSIB with legal jurisdiction pertaining to the Claim and Treatment of the injuries sustained as a result of the occupational injury of September 27, 2007. The WSIB made two fraudulent decision by forgery medical document dated December 3, 2007 in 2007. Evidence is the site (1) part 1-3 and 1th-11th of evidence-61 items and the WSIB ARO’s Decision which the court staff had signed receiving.
’s 3th “He appealed the WSIB decision by way of an internal WSIB administrative appeal. The appeal allowed benefits and additional to those originally allowed by WSIB. The plaintiff did not agree with the decision.”
Fact was that I did agree with the WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 but the WSIB didn’t firmly carry out the Decision. Evidence was the WSIAT’s response letter dated November 18, 2010 “……It appears from your comments on your Notice Appeal Form you are satisfied with the ARO decision of May 7, 2010, and are dissatisfied with the implementation or carrying out of the decision by WSIB Operations….” attached following Evidence- the WSIAT’s response letter.
’s 6th “he did not however avail himself of a further appeal before the WSIAT.
I did agree with the WSIB ARO’s Decision. Why did I appeal it? Evidence- the WSIAT’s response letter.
Following evidence does prove the two defendants making frauds at Ontario superior court under the court Doria and staffs’ evil halp. The WSIAT letter did prove that I agreed with the WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010. This letter had proved that the two defendants openly made frauds at this court. Please see underline parts.
To be continued.