This is Canada Supreme Corrupt Officers Group who did colluded with each other, in common interest, forged evidences, documents and court documents, made the case’s false statements of the material facts, made frauds, framed up injured worker (plaintiff) for their personal gain from 2007 beginning to today….. Details and particulars please see corruptgovernmentofficer.com
Legal evidences did prove the director Sabourin detained the letters exposing his crimes submitted to CJC Chairperson, garbled CJC by-law, made the case’s false statements of material facts, concealed judge Myers’s Forgery and Fraud’s (1.891kg) facts and evidences. Following exposes that the director Sabourin made the “decision” which is a words game’s “decision” for concealing detaining the letters exposing his crimes submitted to CJC Chairperson.
Following is CJC Communication Director’s response which is fair pursuant to law. Please see underlined parts.
The director Sabourin garbled the CJC’s bylaw for concealing his crimes and frauds. Please see the bylaw section 2.2: Original
“The Executive Director shall open a file when a complaint about a named, federally appointed judge made in writing is received in the Council office from any source, including from a member of the Council who is of the view that the conduct of a judge may require the attention of the Council. The Executive Director shall not open a file for complaints which, although naming one or more federally appointed judges, are clearly irrational or an obvious abuse of the complaints process.”
This director did erase above the underline important part. Please this director does explain that I accused the judge Myers committed Forgery and Fraud, Criminal Code: Forgery 366, 367, 368; Fraud 380.(1); 380.1 (1). with facts and evidences, did my accusations be clearly irrational or an obvious abuse of the complaints process? This director made four false decisions which didn’t respond a word to the judge Myers’s crime that I had accused with facts and evidences. This director made five file numbers of the accusation, please this director explain that which does be genuine?
Evidence is following;
Canadian Judicial Council CJC File: 14-0405
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8 CJC File: 15-0024
To: Executive Director, Norman Sabourin CJC File: 15-0089
Fax: 613-288-1575 241-258 Pender E ST Vancouver,V6A1T7
Tieguang Gao, www.disclosedarkforce.com
May 29, 2015
Dear CJC Executive Director, Norman Sabourin
Please confirm following the facts and evidences:
Canadian Federally appointed judge Myers colluded with defendants and court registrars, fabricated facts and law, stole law, framed up plaintiff.
- Canadian Federally appointed judge Myers colluded with defendants and court registrars, fabricated facts and law, stole law, framed up plaintiff.
2. This judge Myers did forge the court document 2014 ONSC 6497 by fabricating facts and law. In the forged court document 2014 ONSC 6497, he forged the Conclusion of ONSC 4962 by erasure, alteration and addition for concealing already criminal conspiracies. He did protect defendants’ criminal activities (Defendants made frauds during Hearing of August 26, 2014 under the court registrars’ evil help) occurred at Ontario superior court.
3. This judge Myers did commit Criminal Code Forgery 366, 367, 368; Fraud 380 (1); 380.1 (1) Federally appointed judge Myers did make use of forged court documents and fraud means already depriving my legal right and my money determined by the ARO’s Decision. Plaintiff (me) who has lost the legal right and the money determined due to the judge Myers’s Forgery and Fraud is entitled to file an accusation for judge Myers’s Forgery and Fraud conduct against his acting fraudulently pursuant to 65(2)(b) to (d) of Canada Judge Act. Judge Myers’s Forgery and Fraud conduct must charge a punishment and public example due to the malicious nature of the fraud.
4. This judge Myers did publicly destroy Canada Legislation and laws, become a hatchet man of persons in authority and interested parties, destroy the Dignity of Canada Law, massacre Canada Law as a federally appointed judge. This is an uncontested fact by evidences. This federally appointed judge Myers openly criminal conduct is very very terrible matter which was that he fabricated facts and law, forged court documents and framed up plaintiff for personal gain, and in law formula, it is a very very terrible phenomenon. The judge Myers publicly fabricated facts and law, forged court documents and framed up plaintiff, how does Canadian Society Order be managed???
5. The Criminal Allegations surrounding the federally appointed judge Myers are so manifestly and profoundly destructive of the concept of impartiality, integrity and independence of judicial role, that public confidence would be sufficiently destroyed to render the judge Myers incapable of executing the judicial office. I am requesting that an inquiry be commenced to determine whether judge Myers should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(b) to (d) of the Judge Act.
Please you confirm following Documents and Laws
Parliament created the Canadian Judicial Council, giving it power to investigate and rule on complaints about the conduct of federal appointed judges.
Judicial accountability: Judicial accountability ensure that is rendered according to the law. Judicial accountability measures are essential to protect the proper application of the Rule of Law, a cornerstone of Canada’s constitutional democracy.
Judicial independence does not give judges the right to do whatever they wish. Many measures exist to ensure that judges are held accountable, include:
* The absolute requirement that cases be decided in open court according to the law and the evidence;
* The duty to provide sufficient reasons for their decisions, which will be available in the public domain;
* The obligation to decide cases according to the evidence and the law;
* Accountability to the public interest for independent decision-making bases upon established and discernable principles of law, and
* The possibility of appeal of their decisions to a higher court.
Judges are independent but remain accountable for their actions:
* Court proceedings are open to the public;
* Journalists and citizens can judge for themselves whether justice has been done. They are free to debate and criticize a judge’ s decision….
The conduct of judges, inside and outside of their courtrooms, can also be investigated by federal or provincial judicial councils that have been given formal investigating powers to account for their behavior and impose measured of recommend sanctions to be taken by the proper authorities.
For all of these reasons judges are, and are seen to be, accountable for their adjudicative functions:
* They have sworn an oath to render justice according to law;
* Their impartiality and independence is constitutionally enshrined; * Their independence, impartiality and integrity are presumed as a matter of law; * They hear case, and render judgment in public; * Their decisions are subject to appeal; * Their reasons are published and may be openly criticized in the press, academic journals or other public discourse, and * Their conduct as judges, as distinct from their judgments, if found wanting, may be the subject of investigation and sanction by federal and provincial judicial councils.
Accountability provides a “check and balance” to satisfy the community that the trust respond in its judiciary is deserved and that respect for the administration of justice is well-founded. It ensures that the authority of judges, whether as individuals or as an institution, is not abused.
Such public accountability anchors public confidence in the independence and impartiality of Canada’s judiciary. Thus accountability acts as a safeguard to preserve judicial independence and provide judicial impartiality.
- Had you seen above three Submissions when you made the two false decisions dated April 21, 2015 and May 19, 2015?
- Your false decision dated April 21, 2015 which made false statements of the material facts to my submission dated March 25, 2015.
- On May 1, 2015, I again sent a registered mail to you for further clarifying these facts and evidences submitted to you with respect to the judge F. L. Myers who colluded with the court supervisor Doria and defendants, publicly made illegal criminal activities-Forgery and Frauds, etc.
- I did accuse that the judge Myers committed Canada Criminal Code, Forgery 366, 367, 368; Fraud 380.(1); 380.1 (1). Your false decision dated May 19, 2015 did not respond a word to the judge F. L. Myers’s illegally criminal activities demonstrated by facts and evidences. If you didn’t make the false statements and garble CJC bylaw, you would give reasons pursuant to Canadian Legislation, Canada Judges Act. and Canada Criminal Code 366,367,368; 380.(1);380.1(1).
The CJC’s Principles of Judicial Conduct
…In making their decisions, judges must be and must appear to be impartial at all time.
…In all cases, judicial independence – the foundation stone of Canadian justice – is central to the process.
“…..No one in Canada is above the law. Everyone, no matter how wealthy or how powerful they are, must obey the law or face the consequences.”
“…The Canada legal system respects individual rights, while at the same time ensuring that our society operates in an orderly manner. An essential principle is that the same law applies to everybody, including police, governments and public officials, who must carry out their public duties according to the law.
- Again reiterate, I did accuse the federal appointed judge F. L. Myers of faking facts and laws, falsifying and forging court documents, committing Forgery, Frauds, Criminal Code: Forgery 366, 367, 368; Fraud 380.(1); 380.1 (1) . Please double check above Submissions and give the response of transparency, integrity, impartiality pursuant to CJC’s Principles and Procedures, and you will be responsible for CJC’s reputation if it is issued.
Complainant: Tieguang Gao
www.disclosedarkforce.com and corruptgovernmentofficer.com
CJC executive director Sabourin hold huge right than Canada Legislation and laws, in other words, any judge’s illegal crimes are Nothing after he obtains personal gain. Just as the judge Myers publicly colluded with court Manager Doria and defendants, fabricated facts and law, forged court documents, framed up plaintiff. Just because judge Myers knows that only the executive director Sabourin obtains interest, his Forgery and Fraud are Nothing. If someone doesn’t take bribes, he will not commit crime. Ontario WSIB officers, Ombudsman and his officers, court Manager Doria and registrars, the federally appointed judge Myers did colluded with each other, in common interest, forge evidences and documents, framed up injured worker (me) for their personal gain from 2007 beginning to now. These Supreme Corrupt Officers did deprive my legal entitlement and money determined by the ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010.
Following, the CJC Director, communications and registry services’s response is impartial pursuant to Canada Judges Act. and laws.
However, the CJC executive director Sabourin did bend law for personal gain, and he garbled the CJC by-law, fabricated facts and laws, made the false statements of material facts, protected the federally appointed judge Myers’s open crimes by concealing the judge Myers’s criminal facts and evidences for personal gain. And he committed Obstruction of Justice.
Following, the registered receipt did prove that the director Sabourin had received the criminal facts and evidences made by the federally appointed Judge Myers. The 1.891 kg’s facts and evidences had been signed by the CJC.
This is a registered fax and recorded in disclosedarkforce.com. and corruptgovernmentofficer.com