(h). The WSIB C-Manager(4)Badovinac publicly falsified all legal evidences,forged document#55,committed Forgery. Evidences

                                                                                                                                                        Court File No: CV-14-501847

 

www.disclosedarkforce.com                                        Date: April 19, 2014

 

                   Defendant (1) the WSIB C-Manager Badovinac’ s forgery and frauds- Details, Particulars and evidences

The WSIB C-Manager Badovinac falsified the statements of all legal evidences and documents, forged the medical document#55. According to the forged document#55, she evilly made fifth fraudulent decision and filed to the forged Claim File with scheme of fraudulent means for rejecting  carrying out the WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010. The C-Manager Badovinac committed Forgery who did falsified all legal evidences and documents by erasure, addition and alteration, forged the medical document#55, knowing it to be false, with the intent that any person should be induced, by the belief that are genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything.

Ontario WSIB’s the fraudulent group (Group) intercepted and detained my Claim Form6 and important Medical Documentations, and made the forged documents and medical document, and made fraudulent decisions and forged medical history records and forged the Claim File Record, and made N times illegal criminal activities, which had caused my cervical spine into permanent aggravation.

The C-Manager( she is defendant (1) the WSIB’s staff 4.) Badovinac’s forgery and frauds which were complexity, duration and degree of planning of the fraud committed was significant. Staff 4 Badovinac did not comply with the Law and Professional Standard, and her illegal criminal activities and conduct did form the subject-matter of the offence.

 

Staff 4 Badovinac had made the false document#55 and a fraudulent decision. She had forged all statements of the case’s documents and evidences making the false document#55 which were recorded in the Claim File, that was known by the staff 4 Badovinac who made it to be false and that was made with a fraudulent intent to induce the investigators to whom it was made to act on it. Following did prove that she made this false fraudulent document#55 with evidences.

 

 

                       FOGERY AND FRAUDS

Staff 4 Badovinac was one of main members of the fraudulent group of the WSIB. After Staff 1 Dicarlo’s fraudulent activities were again disclosed on the conference call of January 5, 2011, Mr. Keen Hely, Case Manager did replace Staff 1. Dicarlo carrying out the WSIB ARO’s Decision (the WSIB Final Decision). He made a fair decision for carrying out the WSIB Final Decision, but the fraudulent group did cancel his decision and order the staff 4. Badovinac replacing Mr. Keen Hely carrying out the WSIB ARO’s Decision. The staff 4 clearly knew the details of this fraudulent case and details of the forged Claim File. The fraudulent group did arrange this Staff 4. Badovinac continuously operating the fraudulent case and reject carrying out the WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 for covering up their illegal criminal activities.

 

  1. She did forge Document MEMO#55 dated August 8, 2011. She committed forgery who made the forged document MEMO#55, knowing it to be false, with intent that it should in any way be used and acted on as genuine. She made fifth fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011 in light of her false document#55(the staff 4 did state it on letter of November 15, 2011)

 

  1. In this false document#55, the staff 4 Badovinac had altered all genuine documents in material parts and made lots of material additions to the genuine documents and made a lot of material alterations in the genuine documents by erasure, obliteration, removal. Evidence-30A the false document#55

 

  1. The staff 4 made the false document#55 under details schemed. For example, a genuine document was separated into many parts stating by erasure, alteration, removal. She did deny all facts and evidences by erasure, alteration, removal in the forgery document#55.

                   

    ***                  FORGERY DOCUMENT#55

Staff 4 did forge the statements of Discharge Report dated July 8, 2011

 

>> = Notations of the forged document#55

 

Discharge Report dated July 8, 2011 was completed by six Specialists. The Report was constitute by Five Sections.  TREATMENT TEAM MEMBERS are Therapist, Psychologist, Pharmacist, Physiotherapist, Kinesiologist and Physician.  E-14A Signature

 

LIFEMARK CENTRE DISCHARGE REPORT DATED JULY 8, 2011.

Evidence-14 DISCHARGE REPORT

 

Note:The staff 4 had forged the important statements of the DISCHARGE REPORT in the false document#55 by altering the genuine documents in material parts, making the material addition to the genuine documents by erasure, obliteration and removal.

False document#55  Evidence-30A

 

The staff4’s false document#55

>> Workers ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited ROM of his neck remain barriers to safe driving

 

Original of DISCHARGE REPORT dated July 8, 2011 

“Mr. Gaos ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited range of motion of his neck remain barriers to safe driving.”

 

Facts and Evidences:

DISCHARGE REPORT dated July 8, 2011 

PROGRESS SUMMARY

MEDICAL SUMMARY  (Doctor and Pharmacist) P.2

………“Overall, Mr. Gao was well engaged in all aspects of the Program and was seen to have made good gains in the Pain Management Program. He has been advised to maintain his present mediation regimen and to continue to embrace the Pain Management Strategies which had been presented to him in the Program.

Mr. Gaos ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited range of motion of his neck remain barriers to safe driving.”

 

Note: In the false document#55, the staff 4 did only write a sentence of the Medical Summary and alter the sentence’s Original “limited range of motion of his neck” into “limited ROM of his neck” in her false document#55.

                                                      

PHYSICAL THERAPY SUMMARY

Note: This was an important SUMMARY, but the staff 4 did not write this physical therapy summary by obliteration in her false document#55.

 

PHYSICAL THERAPY SUMMARY of the DISCHARGE REPORT  P.2

“Mr. Gao is now able to withstand one hour of continuous exercise without bringing on pain or symptoms. He no longer reports fatigue and has improved his overall strength. He is able to perform a squat but reports that deep squats sometimes bring on sensations of dizziness.

 

Cervical range of motion has continued to slowly improve (see below), and he is observed to engage the neck to a greater extent in normal movement patterns, although he continues to use trunk and body movement to compensate for lack of full range. He has been informed by his family doctor and remains fixated on the idea that the damage to the C4 vertebrae (subluxation of C4 on C5 by 1-2mm) is such that his neck will not improve further.

Cervical range of motion:

Flexion       Extension           Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake            10              20                  25/40               10/10

Discharge         30              30                  50/50               20/20

Normal values     80              50                  80/80               45/45

 

Gait velocity has improved to within normal limits, although Mr. Gao reports that he is not yet able to walk as fast as he did prior to his injury as he is afraid of crashing into people. He continues to work on his dynamic balance.

 

Mr. Gao has been encouraged to continue with his activation program at home and has already started to complete his exercise in his home setting.”

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL SUMMARY

This was an important Summary, but the staff 4 did make material alterations to the Psychological Summary by erasure, obliteration, removal, and she did forge Conclusion(BARRIERS) of the Discharge Report with three sentences of the Summary.

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL SUMMARY of the DISCHARGE REPORT

“Mr. Gao continued to show good motivation and participation in the physical portion of the program.

He continued to make small physical and functional gains and was pleased with his progress. Mr. Gao benefited greatly from the structure the program provide and the increased social contact it afforded. His overall demeanor and presentation in the Centre has improved significantly in that Mr. Gao is more open, contactful, communicative and outgoing.

 

In individual counselling sessions, Mr. Gao continued to be genuine and forthright. He confirmed that his mood and many aspects of his overall quality of life have improved steadily while participating in the program. He noted that he was taking better care of himself by eating better, as well.

 

Unfortunately, discussions about his future have not gone well. **Mr. Gao continues to be extremely fixated on his accident claim issues and feels no compelling need to move forward with his life. Suggestions made regarding finding work so as to better his living situation are flatly dismissed as Mr. Gao asserts that his only interest is to right the wrongs done to him. Obsessed as he is with his ideas of fairness and ethics, Mr. Gao went so far as to say if I die tomorrow, at least I will have been working to bring about justice“. Sadly, he does not seem able to compartmentalize his life in a healthy way, with the outcome that he virtually ignores all other aspects of his life, including his family. It is difficult to be optimistic that Mr. Gao will move forward with his life, although one can hope that he will continue to work on improving his physical functioning.

Mr. Gao would not likely benefit from further psychological treatment at this time.”

 

The staff4’s false document#55

BARRIERS:

>> worker continues to be extremely fixated on his accident claim issues and feels no compelling need to move forward with his life. Suggestions made regarding finding work so as to better his living situation are flatly dismissed as the worker asserts that his only interest is to right the wrongs done to him. Obsessed as he is with his ideas of fairness and ethics, the worker went so far as to say if I die tomorrow, at least I will have been working to bring about justice.

 

Note: The staff 4. did alter the statement of Psychological Summary by erasure and obliteration in her false document#55 and she did alter and add above underline sentence to this BARRIERS’s section which was Conclusion of Discharge Report. She did use the three sentences of the Psychology Summary as Conclusion of the Discharge Report. Conclusion of the Discharge Report was constituted by five sections and six specialists’ conclusion

 

The staff4’s false document#55

>> worker will not likely benefit from further **psychological treatment at this time-deemed to be at MMR with NO P.1. For PSCH as of 30JUN2011

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010: CONCLUSION

P5-6 ” Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.”

 

Note: The staff 4 Badovinac did reject ruling on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine in light of the WSIB ARO’s CONCLUSION and the DISCHARGE REPORT of LifeMark Centre. The staff 4 Badovinac had altered this genuine document of the WSIB ARO’s Decision in her fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011.

Evidence: DISCHARGE REPORT of LIFEMAR CENTRE dated July 8, 2011; the WSIB ARO’s Decision

 

Note: The (MMR with NO P.1.) was from the Staff 3 Darwin’s false document MEMO#17; 19.

The staff 4 BADOVINAC did commit an offence who, knowing and believing that the “MMR NO P.I.” document was forged, used, dealt with and acted on it as if it were genuine.

Evidence-17 False document#17,19 and the WSIB ARO’s Decision which disclosed the staffs’ criminal act.

 

Note: Following was an important Summary, but the staff 4 did make material alterations in this genuine document by erasure, obliteration, removal in her false document#55.

 

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPT SUMMARY of the DISCHARGE REPORT

“Mr. Gao actively participated in the functional component of this program which included lifting, carrying, pushing, and pulling. He was receptive to information regarding body mechanics and pacing and worked to incorporate learned strategies into his program. Mr. Gao continues to be limited by reports of pain in the posterior aspect of his neck and by headaches.

 

Mr. Gao no longer has work available to him as a Truck Driver and does not have his Class I Driver’s Licence. Mr. Gao was provided with a local resource that may be able to assist him in vocational planning following the program.

 

Legend:

Frequency Description:

Constant: 66% – 100% of shift

Frequent: 33% – 66% of shift

Occasional: 5% – 33% of shift

Rare:      0% -5% of shift

Never:    Not required

 

Strength Capacity:

0-10 Ibs   Sedentary Strength

11-20 Ibs  Light Strength Level

20-50Ibs   medium Strength Level

50-100Ibs  Heavy Strength Leve.

>100Ibs    very Heavy Strength Level

 

Squatting:

Demonstrated ability: 20/60 seconds: full squat: reports dizziness when assuming and recovering from position

Reported Job Demands: Occasional basis

Job Match: yes

 

Waist to floor Lift:

Demonstrated Ability: 12Ibs

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to MEDIUM

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Waist to Overhead Lift:

Demonstrated Ability: 12Ibs

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic:

RARE/NONE basic:  up to MEDIUM

Job Match: no

 

Front Carrying:

Demonstrated Ability: 15Ibs over approximately 50 feet of even ground

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to MEDIUM

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Right Carrying:

Demonstrated Ability: 6 Ibs over approximately 50 feet of even ground

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to MEDIUM

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Left Carrying:

Demonstrated Ability: 6 Ibs over approximately 50 feet of even ground

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to HEAVY

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Pushing:

Demonstrated Ability: sustained light level force over 30 feet

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic:

RARE/NONE basic: up to MIDIUM

Job Match: no

 

Pulling:

Demonstrated Ability: sustained light level force over 30 feet

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic:

RARE/NONE basic: up to MIDIUM

Job Match: no

 

Reported Tolerances:

  1. Walking: demonstrated completing the morning group walk (approximately 40 minutes).

Reports he is limited in his speed of walking.

  1. Sitting: demonstrated sitting through the 45 minutes education classes in the clinic. Reports requiring neck support when sitting for extended periods of time: observed to lean against the wall with sitting in group sessions.

 

Mr. Gao continues to be limited by reported pain in the posterior aspect of his neck and in his temples bilaterally. He reports his dizziness has improved since beginning the program but continues to report increased dizziness with squatting. Mr. Gao continues to demonstrate functioning at a LIGHT strength level per the NOC and therefor does not demonstrate meeting the MEDIUM strength demands of his pre-injury work as a Truck Driver.

Mr. Gao’s limited neck range of motion and ongoing reports of dizziness may present safety concerns regarding returning to driving (i.e shoulder checks).

 

Mr. Gao has been provided with resources in the community that are available to assist him in the pursuit of possible vocational planning. He has not actively explored these resources at the time of discharge, maintaining he would like to pursue future vocational planning independently. ”

 

Note: The staff 4. Badovinac did erase, obliterate the Diagnosis and Conclusion of OCCUPATIONAL THERAPT of the DISCHARGE REPORT.

 

LIFEMARK CENTRE DISCHARGE REPORT DATED JULY 8, 2011

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK,    

This was this Discharge Report’s Conclusion completed by the Team Members (Six Specialists). This also was the Six Specialists’ Discharge Diagnosis Report.

                                                   Evidence-14A

 

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK,

Note: The staff 4 did alter this COCLUSION of the DISCHARGE REPORT

 

“-” mark represents Original of this Discharge Report.

“#” mark represents the false document#55 made by the staff 4. Badovinac.

 

– Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion-improving, but ongoing

#Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion-this is improving

 

          Note: The staff 4 Badovinac’s false document#55 dated August 8, 2011 had altered it into “this is” improving “         and she had erased the but ongoing

 

–  Decreased core stability and altered posture-improved

# “The staff 4.had altered it into this has improved

 

–  Decreased balance-improved

  # Decreased balance-this has improved

 

Note: She has altered it into “this has improved”

 

–  Headaches-improving, but ongoing

   # headaches- this is improving, but ongoing

 

–  Dizziness-improving, but ongoing

   #this is improving, but ongoing

 

–  Pain focused behavior-improving

   #she had erased this item

 

–  Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion –improving

   #she had erased this item

–  Decreased core stability and altered postureimproved

  #she had erased this item

–  Decrease balance-static balance is improved; working on dynamic balance

  #she had erased this item

–  Headache-improving

  # she had erased this item

–  Dizziness-improving, but brought on by deep squats

  # she had erased this item

–  Decreased functional capacities for lifting and carrying-ongoing

  # Decreased functional capacities for lifting and carryingthis is ongoing

 

–  Class 1 driver’s licence has expired-ongoing

   # Class 1 drivers licence has expired-this is ongoing

 

–  Need for improved pain and stress management to reduce reliance on rest, avoidance of

   activities and medication use-resolving

   # this is resolving

–     Low mood symptoms including agitation, irritability and low self-worth.resolving

# his is resolving

–     Lack of confidence in ability to self-manage pain, stress and physical reactivation.-improving

# this is improving

 

PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

-It is recommended Mr. Gao incorporate learned pacing and body mechanics information into his future working and daily life.

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options.

 

Note: When the staff 4. was ordered to replace Mr. Keen Hely, Case Manager to carry out the WSIB Final Decision, she clearly knew the details of this fraudulent case and details of the forged Claim File. The staff 4 Badovinac did forge the statements of all Documents and Evidences by alteration, erasure and obliteration and make her false document#55 for cover up their illegal criminal activities. She have still continuously made and operated this False Claim File.

 

The X-RAY Report was forged

Note: The X-RAY Report dated March 29, 2008 was forged by erasure and obliteration in her false document#55, and the staff 4.had erased Original of important diagnosis in her false document#55.

 

Note: The staff 4 Badovinac had wilfully erased following Original of the X-Ray Report in her document#55:

 

“…there is minimal osteophytic lipping impinging C4-5 neural foramina on both sides more marked so to the right……….there may be very minimal posterior subluxation of C4 on C5 by about 1 to 2 mm likely due to instability of the facet joints.” Why must she make the erasure to the paragraph’s Original? What did her intent be?               Evidence-30

 

Forgery this Medical Legal Report’s statement in her false document#55

Note: The staff 4 Badovinac had made the erasure and alteration to the Medical Legal Report in her false document#55 and made the material additions to the Medical Legal Report.

The false document#55.

>> IME done on 11JUN2008-Riverfront Medical Service-Dr. Yu

>> No neurological findings-all diagnostic testing is negative for C-Spine/head

>> recommends FRP

>> No further investigations required. Dr. Yu states that the injuries were soft tissue in nature and should gradually improve over a period of months

>> CT Scan of brain and C-Spine following injury was negative and it was deemed that the worker was at MMR with NO P.I. As of 200ct2008

 

Original of Medical Legal Report P2-4

“He has seen Dr. A. P. Eng and analgesics were prescribed”

 

Note: This Report had clearly disclosed that the fraudulent group did not submit genuine documents to the Legal Medical Evaluate Organization, and the forged medical history records were also submitted to Legal Medical Evaluate Organization and Life-Mak Health Centre BC.             Evidence-12

 

Original of Medical Legal Report P3-7

“…….On review of the medical records from Stuttgart Reginal Medical Centre and from Mr. Gao’s history, It appears he had a mild closed head injury. He also sustained soft tissue injury involving his neck and low back and probably a bunt trauma to his left knee.”

 

Note: The Report did disclose that the staff 4 Badovinac had made this erasure and obliteration to this Medical Legal Report.

 

Original of Medical Legal Report  P3-8

He applied for the WSIB benefits in Ontario but his claim was not accepted. As he did not have any financial means to seek treatment in Ontario, he returned to Vancouver. Subsequently Mr. Gao returned to China on October 28, 2007 and while there sought traditional Chinese medical treatment for three months. He returned to Vancouver on February 29, 2008.

.

Note: This date of October 28, 2007 had clearly disclosed this conspiracy made by staff 2 Reis and staff 3 Darwin, and they submitted false medical history recording to the Organization. In the two staffs’ forged documents#17, 19, 22, they did write “On October 28, 2007, the worker returned to China-work related injury to neck area.The Report had clearly disclosed the two staffs’ conspiracies. From October 28, 2007 to February 29, 2008, it was the Four Months not to be three months. The WSIB Director, staff 6-investigator Johnson’s letter dated September 23, 2008 had also written”……that in light of the new medical information from China where you resided between October 28, 2007 and February 29, 2008.”

 

Evidence:

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 P4-4 had proved this truthful date to be November 28, 2007.

Original: “The ARO does conclude that…..Although not clear the ARO believes that the worker exited Canada on November 27 or 28, 2007……”.

 

The WSIB staff 1 Dicarlo’s document MEMO#7 did prove the conspiracy of forged documents#17, 19, 22.

The MEMO#7’s Original “NOV28/07-MEMO 7 –I/W WENT TO VANCOUVER”.  Evidence-29

 

The Medical Legal Report: Original: P3-9

He still has ongoing headaches which he describes as a dull ache. His neck and back symptoms have persisted and are consistent with soft tissue Injuries. There are no neurological findings”.

 

The staff 4 had made the erasure and alteration to this genuine document of Medical Legal Report.

 

The false document#55.

>> recommends FRP

 

The Medical Legal Reports Original

  1. 2-3 “He has seen Dr. A.P. Eng and analgesics were prescribed”.

Note: The paragraph did disclose that both Staff 1 and Staff 3 didn’t submit the X-RAY Report and Medical Documentation dated March 29, 2008 to the Assessment Organization.

 

P.2-6 PAST HEALTH

“Past health has been good. He has not had any previous surgery and has not been hospitalized for any medical problems. He is not taking any medications and does not have a history of allergies.”

 

  1. P. 3-6 “….On review of medical records from Stuttgart Reginal Medical Centre and from Mr. Gao’s history, it appears he had a mild closed head injury. He also sustained soft tissue injury involving his neck and low back….. .”

 

P.3-10 “I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable.”

 

  1. P. 4-1 “No appropriate treatment has been provided.”

 

  1. 4-1 “I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the “functional restoration program.Evidence-12. Medical Legal Report

 

The forged document#55.

>> No further investigations required. Dr. Yu states that the injuries were soft tissue in nature and should gradually improve over a period of months”

 

The Medical Legal Report: Original P4-1

It is probable that at the present time he is unable to return to work as a trucker due to his ongoing symptoms. NO appropriate treatment has been provided. It is probable that with appropriate treatment he may possibly return to some gainful employment but considering his limited command of English his job opportunities are quite limited. I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the “functional restoration program.”

 

“I do not believe he requires further investigation, such as CT scan or MRI of his cervical and lumbar spine. I believe his injuries were soft tissue in nature and should gradually improve over a period of months.”

 

Note: The staff 4 had made the erasure and obliteration to the Conclusion of the Medical Legal Report, and she had altered the Medical Legal Report’s genuine meaning. The staff 4 did again use the forged document# 17, 19 made by the staff 3. DARWIN in her false document#55.

 

The false document#55.

>> CT Scan of brain and C-spine following injury was negative and it was deemed that the worker was at MMR with NO P.I. As of 200CT2008

 

Note: The staff 4 Badovinac continuously used the forged document#17, 19, knowing it to be false, with fraudulent intent to induce the investigators for covering up her illegal criminal activities.

Evidence:

The Medical Legal Report: Original dated June 11, 2008: P3-9

He still has ongoing headaches which he describes as a dull ache. His neck and back symptoms have persisted and are consistent with soft tissue Injuries.”

 

The Medical Legal Report: Original  P4-1

It is probable that at the present time he is unable to return to work as a trucker due to his ongoing symptoms. NO appropriate treatment has been provided. …”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010

  1. 4-10 “….The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

LifeMark Centre Assessment Report dated April 28, 2011

  1. 2-1 (in Emergency Centre)”…..A non-contrast CT scan of the head and neck was noted to be normal…….Mr. Gao was admitted with multiple contusions and suspected closed head injury. His glasgow coma scale on admission tot eh E.R. Was 15/15. “

 

His discharge diagnosis was that of:

A closed head injury with mental status changes.

Knee pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Back pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

 

LifeMark Centre Diagnosis dated April 28, 2011: P5-3

“– Chronic headaches – which did not seem typical of a migraine.

— Dizziness

— Post concussion syndrome-the above 2 complaints could be part of a post concussion syndrome

— Chronic neck pain

— Deconditioned state

 

Medication Recommendations:

— Increase betahistine dosing to 24mg bid

— Taper benzodiazepine and consider initiation of a low dose TCA night to normalize sleep and aid in the management of chronic pain. To consider trazodone as it is least likely to exacerbate his dizziness

— For optimal use of acetaminophen, unilizing the slow release formulation.”

 

LifeMark Centre Discharge Report dated July 8, 2011

“Cervical range of motion

Flexion       Extension           Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake            10              20                  25/40               10/10

Discharge         30              30                  50/50               20/20

Normal values     80              50                  80/80               45/45

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options.”

 

The false document#55.

>> the worker’s ROM of the C-Spine has improved however he is still fixated on the idea that the damage to the C4 vertebrae (subluxation of C4 on C5 by 1-2mm) is such that his neck will not improve further.

 

Note: The staff 4.did alter the Discharge Report of July 8, 2011. She altered the Report’s” limited range of motion of his neck” into “the worker’s ROM of the C-Spine “. And she did alter the “improved” into “has improved “. The fraudulent Group never arranged any treatment from 2007 to April 2011. The damaged C4 vertebrae (subluxation of C4 on C5 by 1-2mm) had experienced a permanent aggravation. This Discharge Report of LifeMark Centre were constituted by five sections and six specialists’ conclusions, and this five sections had been submitted above.

 

Just as The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008 Original: P4-1

NO appropriate treatment has been provided. …”

I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 

  1. 4-10 “….The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

The false document#55.

>> diagnosing testing that was done immediately following the injury (as noted above) did not reveal any abnormalities to the neck/C-Spine and the worker was released from hospital with no treatment plan or follow up recommendations

 

Note: USA Emergency Hospital did have given the recommendation in the Instructions of Discharge Report which had been submitted to the WSIB on September 28, 2007 by a registered mail.

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010  COCLUSION P5-3

The clinical documentation does support that the worker did secure the services of a general practitioner mainly a Dr. Eng……”

 

LifeMark Centre Assessment Report dated April 28, 2011 did state:

  1. 2-1 (in Emergency Centre)”…..A non-contrast CT scan of the head and neck was noted to be normal…….Mr. Gao was admitted with multiple contusions and suspected closed head injury. His glasgow coma scale on admission tot eh E.R. Was 15/15.

His discharge diagnosis was that of:

A closed head injury with mental status changes.

Knee pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Back pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Neck pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:

  1. 4-10 “….The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

The false document#55.

>> there was no indication (no objective findings) that the worker sustained A P.I. Or had any ongoing problems with his neck/C-Spine following his injury and in fact was deemed to have reached maximum medical recovery in OCT 2008 with NO P.I.

 

Note: The staff 4 Badovinac committed forgery who made the false document#55, knowing it to be false, with fraudulent intent for covering up her illegal criminal activities. And she again used the staff 3 Darwin’s false document#17 and 19 as if it was genuine. The staff 4 repeatedly stated these fraudulent documents.

 

The Medical Document Original (WSIB 276#) dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China. Fell and hurt the waist and neck area. Concussion. Always dizzy….. .Waist and neck ligament injury. …”.

Evidence-9. The Document Original

The WSIB ARO’s Decision had proved that the staff 1, staff 2 and staff 3 had forged the medical document.

“Of particular note is the clinical documentation provided by the physicians in China. The notations for December 3, 2007 appear to have been duplicated.

Evidence-11. The WSIB Final Decision

The Group forged the medical document dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China, hurting the neck area. Always feeling faint due to injury by a sudden jerk.…..”               Evidencce-10. Forgery document

 

The Evidences had disclosed that the staffs did forge the fact of the Medical Documentations.

 

The Medical Legal Report  P3-7

” …..On review of the medical records from Stuttgart Regional Medical Centre and from Mr. Gao’s history, it appears he had a mild closed head injury. He also sustained soft tissue injury involving his neck and low back and probably a blunt trauma to his left knee.”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010  COCLUSION P5-3

The clinical documentation does support that the worker did secure the services of a general practitioner mainly a Dr. Eng……”

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:

  1. 4-10 ” It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

LifeMark Centre Discharge Report dated July 8, 2011

“Cervical range of motion

Flexion       Extension           Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake            10              20                  25/40               10/10

Discharge         30              30                  50/50               20/20

Normal values    80               50                  80/80               45/45

 

Mr. Gao’s ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited range of motion of his neck remain barriers to safe driving.

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options.”

 

The false document#55 P.3-1

“……There is nothing medically to support that the worker is totally disabled

 

Note: The staff 4 Badovinac had altered the CONCLUSION of the WSIB ARO’s Decision.

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision  COCLUSION

P.5-6 “Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.”

 

P.5-3″The clinical documentation does support that the worker did secure the services of a general practitioner mainly a Dr. Eng……”

 

P.5-4 “Operations is instructed, with the assistance of the worker, to secure any clinical documentation between the worker’s return to Canada in February 2008 through to June 2008. Once again with the assistance of the worker Operations is to ensure that any clinical documentation subsequent to June 11, 2008 through to the present time be submitted to the claim file record.”

 

P.5-5 “Operations is also instructed to make arrangements to have the worker undergo a FRP to assist him in returning to gainful employment.”

 

Note: The COCLUSION of the WSIB ARO’s Decision did require that the fraudulent group returned detained all clinical documentation to the claim file. The COCLUSION did require that the fraudulent group made arrangement to have the worker undergo a FRP, but the staff 4 Badovinac and the Group did resist to carry out the CONCLUSION, and delay the FRP to April 19, 2011. The staff 4. Badovinac did resist to carry out the CONCLUSION and she made material alterations to this FRP’s Discharge Report by erasure, obliteration, removal in her false document#55.

 

False document#55 dated August 8, 2011 P.3-2

>>  …..-the worker is medically able to drive and the fact that he does not have his class 1 drivers licence is a choice by the worker and not due to his injuries

 

The staff 4.Badovinac was making the frauds as if the frauds was genuine.

Evidence:

DISCHARGE REPORT of LifeMark Centre dated July 8, 2011

PROGRESS SUMMARY

 

MEDICAL SUMMARY  (Doctor and Pharmacist)

“…… Overall, Mr. Gao was well engaged in all aspects of the Program and was seen to have made good gains in the Pain Management Program. He has been advised to maintain his present mediation regimen and to continue to embrace the Pain Management Strategies which had been presented to him in the Program.

 

Mr. Gaos ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited range of motion of his neck remain barriers to safe driving.

 

PHYSICAL THERAPY SUMMARY

“Cervical range of motion

Flexion       Extension           Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake            10              20                  25/40               10/10

Discharge         30              30                  50/50               20/20

Normal values     80              50                  80/80               45/45

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options.

 

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPT SUMMARY

Mr. Gao actively participated in the functional component of this program which included lifting, carrying, pushing, and pulling. He was receptive to information regarding body mechanics and pacing and worked to incorporate learned strategies into his program. Mr. Gao continues to be limited by reports of pain in the posterior aspect of his neck and by headaches.

 

Mr Gao no longer has work available to him as a Truck Driver and does not have his Class I Driver’s Licence. Mr. Gao was provided with a local resource that may be able to assist him in vocational planning following the program.

Mr. Gao’s limited neck range of motion and ongoing reports of dizziness may present safety concerns regarding returning to driving (i.e shoulder checks).

 

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK

This was the Discharge Report’s Conclusion completed by the Team Members (Six Specialists). This also was the Six Specialists’ s Discharge Diagnosis Report.

E-14A

–  Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion-improving, but ongoing

         –  Decreased core stability and altered posture-improved

–  Decreased balance-improved

–  Headaches-improving, but ongoing

–  Dizziness-improving, but ongoing

–  Pain focused behavior-improving

–  Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion –improving

–  Decreased core stability and altered postureimproved

–  Decrease balance-static balance is improved; working on dynamic balance

–  Headache-improving

–  Dizziness-improving, but brought on by deep squats

–  Decreased functional capacities for lifting and carrying-ongoing

–  Class 1 driver’s licence has expired-ongoing

 

–  Need for improved pain and stress management to reduce reliance on rest, avoidance of

   activities and medication use-resolving

–           Low mood symptoms including agitation, irritability and low self-worth.resolving

–     Lack of confidence in ability to self-manage pain, stress and physical reactivation.-improving

 

PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

-It is recommended Mr. Gao incorporate learned pacing and body mechanics information into his future working and daily life

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options

 

Evidence:

Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P2-5

PAST HEALTH

“Past health has been good. He has not had any previous surgery and has not been hospitalized for any medical problems. He is not taking any medications and does not have a history of allergies. He smokes five or six cigarettes a day; does not drink.   Evidence-12

 

The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008: P3-9

He still has ongoing headaches which he describes as a dull ache. His neck and back symptoms have persisted and are consistent with soft tissue Injuries.”

 

The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008: P4-1

It is probable that at the present time he is unable to return to work as a trucker due to his ongoing symptoms. NO appropriate treatment has been provided. …”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 

  1. 4-10 “It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010: CONCLUSION

P5-6 ” Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.”

 

LifeMark Centre Assessment Report dated April 28, 2011

  1. 2-1 (in Emergency Centre) “…..A non-contrast CT scan of the head and neck was noted to be normal…….

His discharge diagnosis was that of:

A closed head injury with mental status changes.

Knee pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Back pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Neck pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.”

 

Diagnosis dated April 28, 2011: P5-3

“– Chronic headaches – which did not seem typical of a migraine.

— Dizziness

— Post concussion syndrome-the above 2 complaints could be part of a post concussion syndrome

— Chronic neck pain

— Deconditioned state

 

Medication Recommendations:

— Increase betahistine dosing to 24mg bid

— Taper benzodiazepine and consider initiation of a low dose TCA night to normalize sleep and aid in the management of chronic pain. To consider trazodone as it is least likely to exacerbate his dizziness

— For optimal use of acetaminophen, unilizing the slow release formulation.”

 

False document#55 P.3-5

>> the worker complains of dizziness and headaches, however there is no objective findings supporting the cause/reason for the dizziness/headaches. The worker has entitlement to soft tissue injuries-there is no entitlement to headaches(again testing done at the time of the accident ruled out any head injuries

 

Note: The staff 4. Badovinac was making the frauds as if her frauds was genuine

.

Evidence:

 

 

The WSIB Document MEMO# 44 dated April 8, 2011

 

“Referral to LifeMark health Centre in BC”

Area(s) of Entitlement: Gen. Head injury/back of neck/lower back”

To:   File

From: Millie King RN BN, Nurse Consultant”

Evidence-30B,  MEMO#44

 

The Medical Document Original(WSIB 276#) dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China. Fell and hurt the waist and neck area. Concussion. Always dizzy….. .Waist and neck ligament injury. …”.

 Evidence-9

The fraudulent group had forged the medical document dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China, hurting the neck area. Always feeling faint due to injury by a sudden jerk……….” **                 Eevidence-10

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 P3-10

“Of particular note is the clinical documentation provided by the physicians in China. The notations for December 3, 2007 appear to have been duplicated.”               Evidence-11

 

The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P3-7

” …..On review of the medical records from Stuttgart Regional Medical Centre and from Mr. Gao’s history, it appears he had a mild closed head injury. He also sustained soft tissue injury involving his neck and low back and probably a blunt trauma to his left knee.”

 Evidence-12

LifeMark Centre Assessment Report dated April 28, 2011

  1. 2-1 (in Emergency Centre) “…..A non-contrast CT scan of the head and neck was noted to be normal…….

His discharge diagnosis was that of:

A closed head injury with mental status changes.

Knee pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Back pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Neck pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.”

 

Diagnosis dated April 28, 2011: P5-3

“– Chronic headaches – which did not seem typical of a migraine.

— Dizziness

— Post concussion syndrome-the above 2 complaints could be part of a post concussion syndrome

— Chronic neck pain

— Deconditioned state

 

Medication Recommendations:

— Increase betahistine dosing to 24mg bid

— Taper benzodiazepine and consider initiation of a low dose TCA night to normalize sleep and aid in the management of chronic pain. To consider trazodone as it is least likely to exacerbate his dizziness

— For optimal use of acetaminophen, unilizing the slow release formulation.”

 Evidence-13

LifeMark Centre Discharge Report dated July 8, 2011

“Cervical range of motion

Flexion       Extension           Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake            10              20                  25/40               10/10

Discharge         30              30                  50/50               20/20

Normal values     80              50                  80/80               45/45

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options.”                                                           

Evidence-14

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 

  1. 4-10 “It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 Evidence-11

False document#55 P.3-6

>> as all original diagnostics done at the time of the workplace accident reveal normal results and noting that there was nothing new from the time of accident to present to support a permanent aggravation of his neck condition. It has been deemed that following the workers participation in the FRP program, he is not totally disabled and can return to work in some capacity. As such, the worker is deemed to have reached maximum medical recovery with NO P.I. To the neck as of the date of completion of the FRP-30JUN2011

 

Note: the staff 4. Badovinac did make the material additions to each genuine document and make the material alterations in each genuine document by erasure, obliteration and removal in her forged document#55.

The staff 4 had N time quoted staff 3 Darwin’s forged document#17 and 19.

 

Evidence:

The WSIB ARO’s Decision  COCLUSION

P.5-6 “Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.”

 

The Medical Document Original (WSIB 276#) dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China. Fell and hurt the waist and neck area. Concussion. Always dizzy….. .Waist and neck ligament injury. ….

 Evidence-9

The fraudulent group had forged the medical document dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China, hurting the neck area. Always feeling faint due to injury by a sudden jerk……….”                     ** Evidence-10

 

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision P.3-10

“Of particular note is the clinical documentation provided by the physicians in China. The notations for December 3, 2007 appear to have been duplicated.        Evidence-11

 

The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P3-7

” …..On review of the medical records from Stuttgart Regional Medical Centre and from Mr. Gao’s history, it appears he had a mild closed head injury. He also sustained soft tissue injury involving his neck and low back and probably a blunt trauma to his left knee.”

Evidence-12

LifeMark Centre Assessment Report dated April 28, 2011

  1. 2-1 (in Emergency Centre) “…..A non-contrast CT scan of the head and neck was noted to be normal…….

His discharge diagnosis was that of:

A closed head injury with mental status changes.

Knee pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Back pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Neck pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.”

  Evidence-13

The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008: P3-9

He still has ongoing headaches which he describes as a dull ache. His neck and back symptoms have persisted and are consistent with soft tissue Injuries.

 

The Medical Legal Report  P3-10

I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable.

 

The Medical Legal Report  P4-1

It is probable that at the present time he is unable to return to work as a trucker due to his ongoing symptoms. NO appropriate treatment has been provided. It is probable that with appropriate treatment he may possibly return to some gainful employment but considering his limited command of English his job opportunities are quite limited. I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the “functional restoration program.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 P.4-5

“Subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinical documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker any clinical documentation between February 2008 and June 2008.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 

COCLUSION

P.5-3″The clinical documentation does support that the worker did secure the services of a general practitioner mainly a Dr. Eng……”

P.5-4 “Operations is instructed, with the assistance of the worker, to secure any clinical documentation between the worker’s return to Canada in February 2008 through to June 2008. Once again with the assistance of the worker Operations is to ensure that any clinical documentation subsequent to June 11, 2008 through to the present time be submitted to the claim file record.”

 

Note: the CONCLUSION did require that the fraudulent group did return the detained Medical Documentations to the Claim File Record.

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 

  1. 4-10 “It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

LifeMark Centre Discharge Report dated July 8, 2011

MEDICAL SUMMARY  (Doctor and Pharmacist)

“…… Mr. Gaos ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited range of motion of his neck remain barriers to safe driving.

 

PHYSICAL THERAPY SUMMARY

“Cervical range of motion

Flexion       Extension         Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake            10              20                  25/40               10/10

Discharge         30              30                  50/50               20/20

Normal values     80              50                  80/80               45/45

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options.

 

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPT SUMMARY

Mr Gao no longer has work available to him as a Truck Driver and does not have his Class I Driver’s Licence. Mr. Gao was provided with a local resource that may be able to assist him in vocational planning following the program.

Mr. Gao’s limited neck range of motion and ongoing reports of dizziness may present safety concerns regarding returning to driving (i.e shoulder checks).

 

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK

This was the Discharge Report’s last an item completed by the Team Members (Six Specialists). This also was the Six Specialists’ s Discharge Diagnosis Report.

E-14A

–  Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion-improving, but ongoing

         –  Decreased core stability and altered posture-improved

–  Decreased balance-improved

–  Headaches-improving, but ongoing

–  Dizziness-improving, but ongoing

–  Pain focused behavior-improving

–  Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion –improving

–  Decreased core stability and altered postureimproved

–  Decrease balance-static balance is improved; working on dynamic balance

–  Headache-improving

–  Dizziness-improving, but brought on by deep squats

–  Decreased functional capacities for lifting and carrying-ongoing

–  Class 1 driver’s licence has expired-ongoing

 

–  Need for improved pain and stress management to reduce reliance on rest, avoidance of

   activities and medication use-resolving

–           Low mood symptoms including agitation, irritability and low self-worth.resolving

–     Lack of confidence in ability to self-manage pain, stress and physical reactivation.-improving

 

PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

-It is recommended Mr. Gao incorporate learned pacing and body mechanics information into his future working and daily life

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options

 

Note: the fraudulent group did intercept and detain my Claim Form6 and reject providing the WSIB with legal jurisdiction pertaining to the claim and treatment of the injuries sustained as a result of the occupational injury of September 24, 2007.

Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008 did have made the instruction “I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable. However, the fraudulent group reject carrying out the Medical Legal Report from June 2008 through to April 2011. The WSIB’s the fraudulent group had already made N time’ illegal criminal activities and rejected providing the WSIB with legal jurisdiction pertaining to the claim and treatment of the injuries sustained as a result of the occupational injury of September 24, 2007, which had caused my cervical spine into permanent aggravation from 2007  beginning through to 2011. Just as the statement of the WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010.

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010

  1. 4-10It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

                  The WSIB Fifth Fraudulent Decision

made by the staff 4 Badovinac according to her false document#55

 

Note: The staff 4. Badovinac committed forgery who made fifth fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011, knowing it to be false, with intent that it should in any way be used and acted on it as genuine decision.

 

Fifth fraudulent decision made by the staff 4 Badovinac   

“I have received the discharge report from Life Mar Centre dated June 30, 2011. In the report it has been identified that although you may have some issues with your neck and headaches, it has been determined that you are not totally disabled and therefore are capable of returning to the work force in some capacity.”

 

Note: The staff 4 didn’t quote the Report’s Original supporting her fraudulent conspiracies, such as “what identified” “what determined” to these “..although you may have some issues with your neck and headaches”; “..you are not totally disabled”; “..are capable of returning to the work force in some capacity.”? She didn’t also arrange any returning to the wok or retraining for the work.

 

This Discharge Report of FRP was a genuine document. The staff 4 Badovinac had altered this genuine document’s material parts and made lots of material additions to the genuine document by erasure, obliteration, removal in her fraudulent decision of September 20, 2011, that was known by the staff 4 Badovinac who made it to be false and that was made with a fraudulent intent to induce the investigators to whom it was made to act on it. Following did prove that she, after 80 days receiving this Report, made this fraudulent decision with evidences.

 

Evidence:

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010

CONCLUSION

P5-6 ” Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.”

 

The staff 4 Badovinac did not rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine in light of the WSIB ARO’s Decision and the DISCHARGE REPORT of LifeMark Centre. The staff 4 Badovinac had altered the WSIB ARO’s Decision and the Discharge Report and made material additions in her fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011.

 

DISCHARGE REPORT of LIFEMAR CENTRE dated July 8, 2011; PROGRESS SUMMARY

 

MEDICAL SUMMARY  (Doctor and Pharmacist) P.2

………“Mr. Gaos ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited range of motion of his neck remain barriers to safe driving.”

 

PHYSICAL THERAPY SUMMARY

Cervical range of motion:

Flexion       Extension           Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake            10              20              25/40               10/10

Discharge         30              30              50/50               20/20

Normal values     80              50               80/80               45/45

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options.

 

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPT SUMMARY

Mr Gao no longer has work available to him as a Truck Driver and does not have his Class I Driver’s Licence. Mr. Gao was provided with a local resource that may be able to assist him in vocational planning following the program.

 

Legend:

Frequency Description:

Constant: 66% – 100% of shift

Frequent: 33% – 66% of shift

Occasional: 5% – 33% of shift

Rare:      0% -5% of shift

Never:    Not required

 

Strength Capacity:

0-10 Ibs   Sedentary Strength

11-20 Ibs  Light Strength Level

20-50Ibs   medium Strength Level

50-100Ibs  Heavy Strength Leve.

>100Ibs    very Heavy Strength Level

 

Squatting:

Demonstrated ability: 20/60 seconds: full squat: reports dizziness when assuming and recovering from position

Reported Job Demands: Occasional basis

Job Match: yes

 

Waist to floor Lift:

Demonstrated Ability: 12Ibs

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to MEDIUM

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Waist to Overhead Lift:

Demonstrated Ability: 12Ibs

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic:

RARE/NONE basic:  up to MEDIUM

Job Match: no

 

Front Carrying:

Demonstrated Ability: 15Ibs over approximately 50 feet of even ground

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to MEDIUM

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Right Carrying:

Demonstrated Ability: 6 Ibs over approximately 50 feet of even ground

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to MEDIUM

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Left Carrying:

Demonstrated Ability: 6 Ibs over approximately 50 feet of even ground

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic: up to HEAVY

RARE/NONE basic:

Job Match: no

 

Pushing:

Demonstrated Ability: sustained light level force over 30 feet

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic:

RARE/NONE basic: up to MIDIUM

Job Match: no

 

Pulling:

Demonstrated Ability: sustained light level force over 30 feet

Reported Required Strength Capacity:

CONSTANT basic:

FREQUENT basic:

OCCASIONAL basic:

RARE/NONE basic: up to MIDIUM

Job Match: no

 

 

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK of the DISCHARGE REPORT Dated July 8, 2011

This was the Discharge Report’s Conclusion completed by the Team Members (Six Specialists). This also was the Six Specialists’ s Discharge Diagnosis Report.

Evidence-14A

The staff 4 Badovinac had altered the COCLUSION of the DISCHARGE REPORT

 

“-” mark represents the Discharge Report’s Original.

“*” mark represents the forged document#55 made by the staff 4 Badovinac.

 

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK,

–  Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion-improving, but ongoing

  *Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motionthis is improving

 

          The forged document#55 made by this staff 4 Badovinac had altered the “improving, but ongoing”                                                                                      

into “this is improving”, and the staff 4 did erase this “but ongoing”.

 

–  Decreased core stability and altered posture-improved

*She had altered it into (this has improved)

 

–  Decreased balance-improved

  *She has altered it into (this has improved)

 

–  Headaches-improving, but ongoing

   *headaches- (this is improving, but ongoing)

 

–  Dizziness-improving, but ongoing

   *(this is improving, but ongoing)

 

–  Pain focused behavior-improving

   *she had erased this important diagnosis (it)

 

–  Decreased cervical and thoraco-lumbar range of motion –improving

   *she had erased this it

–  Decreased core stability and altered postureimproved

  *she had erased this it

–  Decrease balance-static balance is improved; working on dynamic balance

  *she had erased this it

–  Headache-improving

  *she had erased this it

–  Dizziness-improving, but brought on by deep squats

  *she had erased this it

–  Decreased functional capacities for lifting and carrying-ongoing

  *(this is ongoing)

–  Class 1 driver’s licence has expired-ongoing

  *(this is ongoing)

–  Need for improved pain and stress management to reduce reliance on rest, avoidance of

   activities and medication use-resolving

   *(this is resolving)

–     Low mood symptoms including agitation, irritability and low self-worth.resolving

–     *(this is resolving)

–     Lack of confidence in ability to self-manage pain, stress and physical reactivation.-improving

–     *(this is improving)

 

PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

-It is recommended Mr. Gao incorporate learned pacing and body mechanics information into his future working and daily life

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options

 

When the staff 4. Badovinac was ordered to replace Mr. Keen Hely to carry out the WSIB ARO’s Decision,

she clearly knew the details of this fraudulent case and details of the forged Claim File. However she did still

forge and operate this Claim File. The staff 4 Badovinac had committed an offence who, knowing and believing that her decision dated September 20, 2011 was forged, used and acted on it.

 

Fifth fraudulent decision made by the staff 4 Badovinac

“Most of the information in the discharge report speaks to your complaints of pain and your fear of continuing pain. Pain is subjective and therefore not measurable. All objective and measurable findings indicate that you are not totally disabled. In fact all the medical reports submitted at the time of your accident revealed no abnormalities and you were discharged with no follow up requirement or treatment plan.”

 

Note: The staff 4. Badovinac had altered these genuine documents including Medical Legal Report and Discharge Report. She did also erase and obliterate these diagnosis and instructions of these documents. Especially, she did erase and obliterate this instruction of Discharge Report dated September 25, 2007(USA Emergency Centre) in this fraudulent decision. The staff 4. Badovinac did attempt to cause any person to use and act on her fraudulent decision as if her fraudulent decision was genuine. The WSIB staffs had never responded a word to the illegal criminal activities made by them although I had made N time complaints to their criminal activities, as same as the Ombudsman Office’s conduct.

 

The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008: P3-9

He still has ongoing headaches which he describes as a dull ache. His neck and back symptoms have persisted and are consistent with soft tissue Injuries. I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable.

 

The WSIB Final Decision dated May 7, 2010  CONCLUSION

P5-6 ” Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.”

 

Note: There have not been any Document or Report to require the staff 4 Badovinac to rule on this “totally disabled”.  Just as the Group’s fraudulent theory “When the decisions are reached, you may challenge any decision. As a result, when these persons have died, there have still been decisions to wait them for challenge”.

 

The Medical Document Original (WSIB 276#) dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China. Fell and hurt the waist and neck area. Concussion. Always dizzy..… .Waist and neck ligament injury. …”.   Evidence-9

 

The Forged medical document dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China, hurting the neck area. Always feeling faint due to injury by a sudden jerk……….” ** Evidence-10

 

The WSIB ARO”s Decision dated May 7, 2010

  1. 3-10 “Of particular note is the clinical documentation provided by the physicians in China. The notations for December 3, 2007 appear to have been duplicated”.** Evidence-11

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 

  1. 4-10 “It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

DISCHARGE REPORT of LIFEMAR CENTRE dated July 8, 2011; PROGRESS SUMMARY

MEDICAL SUMMARY  (Doctor and Pharmacist)

“…… Mr. Gaos ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited range of motion of his neck remain barriers to safe driving.” Please see the MEDICAL SUMMARY’s details above.

 

PHYSICAL THERAPY SUMMARY

Cervical range of motion:

Flexion       Extension           Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake           10              20                  25/40               10/10

Discharge        30              30                  50/50               20/20

Normal values    80               50                  80/80               45/45

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options.

Please see its details above.

 

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPT SUMMARY

Mr Gao no longer has work available to him as a Truck Driver and does not have his Class I Driver’s Licence. Mr. Gao was provided with a local resource that may be able to assist him in vocational planning following the program. Job Match: no. Please see its details above.

 

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK of the DISCHARGE REPORT Dated July 8, 2011

This was the Discharge Report’s Conclusion completed by the Team Members (Six Specialists). This also was the Six Specialists’s Discharge Diagnosis Report. Please see its details above.

Evidence-14A

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010  COCLUSION P5-3

The clinical documentation does support that the worker did secure the services of a general practitioner mainly a Dr. Eng……”                       Evidence-11

 

The Medical Legal Report  P3-10

I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable.

 

The Medical Legal Report  P4-1

NO appropriate treatment has been provided……I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the “functional restoration program.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 P.4-5

“Subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinical documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker, any clinical documentation between February 2008 and June 2008.”

 

Both the Decision and Report had clearly disclosed that this group did intercept, detain, alter, forge documents and reports. The staff 4 Badovinac did attempt to cause any person to use and act on her fraudulent decision as if her fraudulent decision was genuine.

 

Fifth fraudulent decision made by the staff 4 Badovinac

“Based on the recommendations by the function and pain program, it has been indicated that you will not benefit from further psychological treatment at this time, and therefore it is deemed that you have reached maximum medical recovery(MMR) with no permanent impairment for psych as of June 30, 2011″

 

The staff 4. Badovinac had altered the CONCLUSION of the WSIB Final Decision and also altered this genuine document-LifeMark Centre Discharge Report dated July 8, 2011.

Evidence

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state: CONCLUSION

P5-6 ” Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.”

 

Note: The staff 4. Badovinac had altered the CONCLUSION P.5-6 into “with no permanent impairment for psych in her fraudulent decision. There have not been any document and report to require the staff 4 Badovinac to rule on the “permanent impairment for psych“. Just as the Group’s fraudulent theory “You will have opportunity to challenge any decision when the decisions are reached. As a result, when these injured workers have died, there have still been decisions to wait them for challenge.

 

Discharge Report of LifeMark Centredated July 8, 2011

PSYCHOLOGICAL SUMMARY (Original) P. 3-2, 3

“In individual counselling sessions, Mr. Gao continued to be genuine and forthright. He confirmed that his mood and many aspects of his overall quality of life have improved steadily while participating in the program. He noted that he was taking better care of himself by eating better, as well.

 

“Unfortunately, discussion about his future have not gone well. Mr. Gao continues to be extremely fixated on his accident claim issues and feels no compelling need to move forward with his life.Suggestions made regarding finding work so as to better his living situation are flatly dismissed as Mr. Gao asserts that his only interest is to ‘right the wrongs done to him’. Obsessed as he is with his ideas of fairness and ethics, Mr. Gao went so far as to say “If I die tomorrow, at least I will have been working to bring about justice”. Sadly, he does not seem able to compartmentalize his life in a healthy way, with the outcome that he virtually ignores all other aspects of his life, including his family.  ………”

“Mr. Gao would not likely benefit from further psychological treatment at this time.”

 

Fifth fraudulent decision made by the staff 4 Badovinac

“as well, all the original diagnostic testing done at the time of the workplace accident reveal normal results and noting that there are nothing new from the time of the accident to present to support a permanent aggravation of your neck condition. It has been deemed that following your participation in the function and pain program, you are not totally disabled and can return to work in some capacity, as such, it again has been determined that you have reached maximum medical recovery(MMR)with no permanent aggravation to your neck as of the date of completion of the function and pain program June 30, 2011.”

 

Note: If the WSIB the staffs had complied with Law and Professional Standard and Ethics, these illegal criminal activities wouldn’t have been occurred.

The WSIB’s the fraudulent group (colluded with my employer) intercepted and detained my Claim Form6 and important Medical Documentations, forged documents, made fraudulent decisions, forged medical history records, forged the Claim File Records, made N times illegal criminal activities; the Group rejected to provide the WSIB with legal jurisdiction pertaining to the claim and treatment of the injuries sustained as a result of the occupational injury of September 24, 2007; the Group deprived my entitlement and rejected to carry out Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008; these illegal criminal activities made by the WSIB had caused my cervical spine into permanent aggravation.

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010  P1-3, 4

On September 24, 2007 this driver was injured during a motor vehicle accident (MVA) while he was sleeping in the sleeper compartment of a tractor trailer.

The worker was seen in the Emergency Department of a local hospital in Arkansas and was diagnosed with multiple soft tissue injuries.”

 

The staff 4 Badovinac committed an offence who, knowing and believing that her fraudulent decision was forged, caused and attempted to cause any person to use and act on it as if it were genuine. The staff 4 Badovinac had forged the statements of all Legal Medical Documents and Evidences and forged the Claim File in her false document#55 for covering up her Illegal criminal Activities.

 

The Medical Document Original (WSIB 276#) dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China. Fell and hurt the waist and neck area. Concussion. Always dizzy….. .Waist and neck ligament injury. …”.     Evidence-9

 

The fraudulent group made the forged medical document

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China, hurting the neck area. Always feeling faint due to injury by a sudden jerk……….” **                Evidence-10

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010

  1. 3-10 “Of particular note is the clinical documentation provided by the physicians in China. The notations for December 3, 2007 appear to have been duplicated”.** Evidence-11

 

Note: The facts and evidences had disclosed and proved that the WSIB staffs had forged the facts of the Medical Documentations.

 

Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P2-5

PAST HEALTH

“Past health has been good. He has not had any previous surgery and has not been hospitalized for any medical problems. He is not taking any medications and does not have a history of allergies. He smokes five or six cigarettes a day; does not drink.   Evidence-12

 

The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P3-9

He still has ongoing headaches which he describes as a dull ache. His neck and back symptoms have persisted and are consistent with soft tissue Injuries.             Evidence-12

 

The Medical Legal Report  P3-10

I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable”.

.

The Medical Legal Report  P4-1

It is probable that at the present time he is unable to return to work as a trucker due to his ongoing symptoms.”

 

“NO appropriate treatment has been provided.”

 

“I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the “functional restoration program.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 P.4-5

“Subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinical documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker any clinical documentation between February 2008 and June 2008.”

 

Note: Both the Report and the Decision had disclosed that the WSIB staff did intercept and detain all clinical documentations

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010  COCLUSION

P.5-3″ The clinical documentation does support that the worker did secure the services of a general practitioner mainly a Dr. Eng……”

 

P.5-4 “Operations is instructed, with the assistance of the worker, to secure any clinical documentation between the worker’s return to Canada in February 2008 through to June 2008. Once again with the assistance of the worker Operations is to ensure that any clinical documentation subsequent to June 11, 2008 through to the present time be submitted to the claim file record.”

 

Note: This CONCLUSION did instruct that the WSIB staff did return the detained Medical Documentations to this Claim File Records and determine any continuation of LOE benefits.

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010

P.4-8 “LOE benefits are restored to the worker June 7, 2008 through to June 11, 2008. Once again Operations is instructed to secure any additional clinic documentation that may be available with the assistance of the worker to determine any continuation of LOE benefits.”

 

LifeMark Centre Discharge Report dated July 8, 2011

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SUMMARY P.3-5 which is stated above.

 

Fifth fraudulent decision made by the staff 4 Badovinac

“Although you have complained of dizziness and headaches, there are no objective medical findings supporting the cause and /or the dizziness/headaches. You were original granted entitlement to soft tissue injuries and at the time of the workplace accident, entitlement to headaches were not granted and tests done at that time ruled out any injuries to the head. Therefore, there is still no entitlement to headaches/dizziness.”

 

Note: Staff 4 Badovinac had committed forgery who made the false document#55 and the fraudulent decision, knowing it to be false, with the intent that any person should be induced, by the belief that is genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything. Following facts and evidences prove her illegal criminal activities;

 

EVIDENCE:

The WSIB Document MEMO# 44 dated April 8, 2011

 

“Referral to LifeMark health Centre in BC”

Area(s) of Entitlement: Gen. Head injury/back of neck/lower back”

To:   File

From: Millie King RN BN, Nurse Consultant”

Evidence-30B; MEMO#44

 

The Medical Document (WSIB 276#) dated December 3,2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China. Fell and hurt the waist and neck area. Concussion. Always dizzy….. .Waist and neck ligament injury. ….

  Evidence-9

The fraudulent group did forge this medical document dated December 3, 2007

“The patient was suffering from work-related injury outside China, hurting the neck area. Always feeling faint due to injury by a sudden jerk……….” **

                                                     Evidence-10

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010

  1. 3-10 “Of particular note is the clinical documentation provided by the physicians in China. The notations for December 3, 2007 appear to have been duplicated”.** Evidence-11

 

The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P3-7

“…..On review of the medical records from Stuttgart Regional Medical Centre and from Mr. Gao’s history, it appears he had a mild closed head injury. He also sustained soft tissue injury involving his neck and low back and probably a blunt trauma to his left knee.”

                                                     Evidence-12

LifeMark Centre Assessment Report dated April 28, 2011

  1. 2-1 (in Emergency Centre) “…..A non-contrast CT scan of the head and neck was noted to be normal…….

His discharge diagnosis was that of:

A closed head injury with mental status changes.

Knee pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Back pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.

Neck pain secondary to motor vehicle accident.”

 Evidence-13

LifeMark Centre Diagnosis dated April 28, 2011: P5-3

“– Chronic headaches – which did not seem typical of a migraine.

— Dizziness

— Post concussion syndrome-the above 2 complaints could be part of a post concussion syndrome

— Chronic neck pain

— Deconditioned state

Medication Recommendations:

— Increase betahistine dosing to 24mg bid

— Taper benzodiazepine and consider initiation of a low dose TCA night to normalize sleep and aid in the management of chronic pain. To consider trazodone as it is least likely to exacerbate his dizziness

— For optimal use of acetaminophen, unilizing the slow release formulation.”

 Evidence-13

X-RAY/ULTRASOUND Medical Report dated March 29, 2008

Note: Staff 4 Badovinac had made the material alteration to this X-RAY Report by erasure, obliteration, removal. She did erase and obliterate following paragraph of this X-RAY Report.

 

“…………..there is minimal osteophytic lipping impinging C4-5 neural foramina on both sides more marked so to the right……….there may be very minimal posterior subluxation of C4 on C5 by about 1 to 2 mm likely due to instability of the facet joints.”                       Evidence-30

 

Note: The staff 4. Badovinac had made the erasure to the important parts of the Diagnosis of the X-RAY Report dated March 29, 2008. Why must the staff 4 Badovinac make the erasure, obliterate to the important diagnosis? Her intent was that she could continuously forge the Claim File records. She also believed that her “Right” should be bigger than any Law. So she did wilfully forge documents and decision.

 

The Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P4-1

It is probable that at the present time he is unable to return to work as a trucker due to his ongoing symptoms.”

NO appropriate treatment has been provided.”

“I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the “functional restoration program.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 P.4-5

“Subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinical documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker any clinical documentation between February 2008 and June 2008.”

CONCLUSION

P.5-4 “Operations is instructed, with the assistance of the worker, to secure any clinical documentation between the worker’s return to Canada in February 2008 through to June 2008. Once again with the assistance of the worker Operations is to ensure that any clinical documentation subsequent to June 11, 2008 through to the present time be submitted to the claim file record.”

 

Note: The Decision had disclosed the WSIB’s staff did intercept and detain all clinical documentations.

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010  COCLUSION P5-3

“The clinical documentation does support that the worker did secure the services of a general practitioner mainly a Dr. Eng……”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010

  1. 4-10 “It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

 

Fifth fraudulent decision made by the staff 4 Badovinac

“As much, to reiterate, it has been deemed that you are not totally disabled and that you are capable of returning to work in some capacity, this was determined using objective medical findings and the final recommendations as result of your participation in the function and pain program. Therefore as of June 30, 2011 it is deemed that you have reached maximum medical recovery with no permanent aggravation of your neck injury.”

 

Note: The staff 4 Badovinac had committed forgery who had made false document#55 and the fraudulent decision, knowing it to be false, with the intent that any person should be induced, by the belief that is genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything.

 

My injured cervical spine had been caused the permanent aggravation as a result of the Group to reject carrying out Medical Legal Report, reject providing the WSIB with legal jurisdiction pertaining to the claim and treatment of the injuries sustained as a result of the occupational injury of September 24, 2007. This group

Does make illegal criminal activities from October 2, 2007 through to today 2014, reject to providing the WSIB with legal jurisdiction and deprive my entitlement and rights instructed by Medical Legal Report for Functional Restoration Program (FRP).

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010  P.2-4

“The examination was conducted on June 11, 2008 and the worker was discharged with a mild closed head injury, soft tissue injuries to the neck and low back. The examiner noted that the worker presented with persistent soft tissue injuries and required a Function Restoration Program (FRP) in an attempt to return to employment. He also considered that the worker was not capable of returning to his regular occupation as a driver until after the FRP.”

 

DISCHARGE REPORT of LIFEMAR CENTRE dated July 8, 2011; PROGRESS SUMMARY

MEDICAL SUMMARY  (Doctor and Pharmacist)

 

“…… Mr. Gaos ongoing dizziness and ongoing limited range of motion of his neck remain barriers to safe driving.” MEDICAL SUMMARY’s details above.

 

PHYSICAL THERAPY SUMMARY

Cervical range of motion:

Flexion       Extension           Rotation            Side Flexion(R/L)

Intake           10              20                  25/40               10/10

Discharge        30              30                  50/50               20/20

Normal values    80              50                  80/80               45/45

 

-Mr. Gao has been referred to an agency in Vancouver to assist him in exploring possible vocational options.”  Please see its details above.

 

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPT SUMMARY

Mr. Gao actively participated in the functional component of this program which included lifting, carrying, pushing, and pulling. He was receptive to information regarding body mechanics and pacing and worked to incorporate learned strategies into his program. Mr. Gao continues to be limited by reports of pain in the posterior aspect of his neck and by headaches.

 

Mr Gao no longer has work available to him as a Truck Driver and does not have his Class I Driver’s Licence. Mr. Gao was provided with a local resource that may be able to assist him in vocational planning following the program. Job Match: no. Please see its details above.

 

BARRIERS TO RETURN TO WORK of the DISCHARGE REPORT Dated July 8, 2011

This was the Discharge Report’s Conclusion completed by the Team Members (Six Specialists). This also was the Six Specialists’ Discharge Diagnosis Report. Please see its details above.

Evidence-14A

Note: When the staff 4 Badovinac was ordered replacing Mr. Keen Hely to carry out the WSIB ARO’s Decision, she clearly knew the details of this fraudulent case and details of the forged Claim File. She have still continuously forged and operated this Claim File.

 

The WSIB staff 1, staff 2, staff 3, staff 4 had made N times illegal criminal activities and rejected carrying out Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008 and the WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 which had caused my cervical spine into permanent aggravation. Just as the WSIB ARO’s Decision did state:

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 

  1. 4-10 “It is noted that the worker has not undergone any active physiotherapy treatment that the worker should be provided with a FRP to assist him in returning to employment. The balance of evidence does suggest that the worker has experienced an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition but it is unknown at this stage whether or not the worker has indeed experienced a permanent aggravation for the ongoing soft tissue injury of the cervical spine.”

 

Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P2-5

PAST HEALTH

“Past health has been good. He has not had any previous surgery and has not been hospitalized for any medical problems. He is not taking any medications and does not have a history of allergies. He smokes five or six cigarettes a day; does not drink.   Evidence-12

 

Medical Legal Report dated June 11, 2008  P3-10

“I believe a functional restoration program, to be sponsored by WSIB Ontario, would be reasonable “.

 

Medical Legal Report  P4-1

It is probable that at the present time he is unable to return to work as a trucker due to his ongoing symptoms.”

“NO appropriate treatment has been provided.”

“I cannot comment on when Mr. Gao can return to his job as a truck driver as this would depend on the results of the “functional restoration program.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 P.4-5

“Subsequent to the worker’s return in February 2008 there is no existing clinical documentation available to the ARO until the medication receipts dated June 7, 2008. Clearly the worker would have seen Dr. Eng prior to this date and Operations is instructed to secure, with the assistance of the worker any clinical documentation between February 2008 and June 2008.”

P.5-4 “Operations is instructed, with the assistance of the worker, to secure any clinical documentation between the worker’s return to Canada in February 2008 through to June 2008. Once again with the assistance of the worker Operations is to ensure that any clinical documentation subsequent to June 11, 2008 through to the present time be submitted to the claim file record.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 did state:  COCLUSION

P.5-3″ The clinical documentation does support that the worker did secure the services of a general practitioner mainly a Dr. Eng……”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010 P3-10 

“Of particular note is the clinical documentation provided by the physicians in China. The notations for December 3, 2007 appear to have been duplicated.”

 

Note: The WSIB staffs had made erasures and material alteration to this clinical documentation dated December 3, 2007. This CONCLUSION did require that the WSIB staffs did return the Medical Documentations detained to the Claim File Records and determine any continuation of LOE benefits.

 

 

        The WSIB Staff 4. Badovinac Response Dated November 15, 2011

Notice: I did accuse that she made false document#55 and fraudulent decision of September 20, 2011. She had not responded a word to her illegal criminal activities accused in her response.

 

The staff 4 Badovinac Response:

“Your letter suggests that I intentionally delayed issuing my September 20, 2011 decision. I wanted to make the best decision possible and noting the complexity of your case I wished to thoughtfully consider the evidence before rendering a decision. There was no intent on my part to cause you any distress and I apologize if you felt differently.”

 

Note: It is not “intentionally delayed…..”but it is that she intentionally made the fraudulent decision and false the document#55 for covering up their illegal criminal activities. So she didn’t response a word to her forgery accused by me. Her the best “decision” was just forgery. The “complexity of this case” was further made by her false document#55 and fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011, and the Ombudsman Office ERO Phillips’s illegal decision which wilfully violated Ontario Ombudsman Act and forged the case’s key important evidence dated September 28, 2007 and made the case’s the false statements of the material facts for reaching their Deal/Trading between the Ombudsman Office and the WSIB.

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010  CONCLUSION

P5-6 ” Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.”

 

Note: The”the best decision possible is that the staff 4 Badovinac had made fifth fraudulent decision by forging all Medical Documentations and Evidences.

The noting the complexity is that the staff 4Badovinac had continuously forged documents to this Claim File and continued to operate the forged claim file, and the Ombudsman Office did support this criminal conduct.

The thoughtfully consider the evidence is that the staff 4 Badovinac had thoughtfully continued forgery Medical Documents and Evidences and made the false document#55 which had caused the fraudulent case to be much more complication and rejected to carry out the WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010. Both the staff 4 Badovinac and the Office’s 2 ERO were specialists of forgery evidences.

 

The staff 4 Badovinac response:

“You have raised concern that my decision dated September 20, 2011, contains no direct quotes from the Life Mark Health reports. Decision letters do not always contain detailed findings from medical reports, but the rationale for the decisions are usually contained in the relevant documentation within the case file. For you information, I have attached a copy of my decision memo.”

 

The WSIB ARO’s Decision dated May 7, 2010  

CONCLUSION P5-6

“Following the completion of the FRP Operations is instructed to rule on the worker’s entitlement to a permanent aggravation of a pre-existing condition for the cervical spine.”   Evidence-11

 

contains no direct quotes from the Life Mark Health reports.

 

Note: The staff 4 Badovinac had forged the Discharge Report’s Diagnosis and Conclusion by erasure, obliterate, alteration, material addition so the staff 4. Badovinac was afraid of direct quoting these evidences from the Discharge Report. In other words, she was afraid of these forgeries to show on the fraudulent decision. I did accuse that she had made criminal activities that she didn’t respond a ward to my accusation in her this response, which were as same as the WSIB leaders and the Ombudsman Office.

 

Decision letters do not always contain detailed findings from medical reports

 

Note: The staff 4. Badovinac was afraid of these detailed findings from the Medical Report. The detailed findings from Medical Reports was Medical Documentations which were the Evidences and Facts. The staff 4. Badovinac had forged these legal documents and made the fraudulent decision dated September 20, 2011. The staff 4. Badovinac’s “theory” is that her Right is the biggest than any Law for covering up their criminal conduct. She may forge these documents, the Claim File and the decision in light of her “theory”. Her “theory” was detailed findings not to be evidence that her forgery was evidence.

 

“but the rationale for the decisions are usually contained in the relevant documentation within the case file.”

 

Note: Just because the staff 4 Badovinac had forged these documents and the Claim File for covering up their criminal activities including the Ombudsman Office so she needs to have been forging and committing.

 

The WSIB Document; Decision-Making

Principles

The Act sets out several principles the WSIB must follow when making decisions.

 

The WSIB is not required to follow legal precedent in making decision, but makes its decisions based on the merits and justice of a case. As an inquiry system (rather than an adversarial system), the WSIB gathers relevant information, weighs evidence, and makes decisions.

 

Note: The staff 4 Badovinac had committed forgery who made the false documents and the decision and the forged Claim File, knowing it to be false, with the intent that any person should be induced, by the belief that are genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything.

 

The staff 4 Badovinac’s forgery and frauds which are complexity, duration and degree of planning of the frauds committed was significant.

The staff 4 Badovinac did not comply with the Law and Professional Standard and Ethics, and her illegal criminal activities and conduct form the subject-matter of the offence.

 

” Copy: I David Marshall, President & CEO”

 

Note: This was the staff 4 Badovinac had made the fraudulent response, and the WSIB never stops and prevents from these criminal activities including the Ombudsman Office which had also forged court document and openly made frauds occurred at Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

 

The staff 4 Badovinac forged medical document# 55, the WSIB’s fifth fraudulent decision, that was known by the staff 4 Badovinac who made it to be false and that was made with a fraudulent intent to induce the readers and investigators to whom it was made to act on it.

The staff 4 Badovinac had falsified all evidences and documents,and parts are attached, other will post again. Please Honorable Readers visit LifeMark Ceatre’s Assessment Report and Discharge Report.

Scan10013

 

Scan10036

Scan10037

Scan10038

1 (7)

1 (8)

1 (9)

1 (10)

1 (11)

Scan10032

The WSIB staff 4 Badovinac forged document#55, rejected carrying out the ARO’s Final Decision dated May 7, 2010. The staff 4 Badovinac forged medical document#55 by erasure, addition, alteration. The staff 4 Badovinac forged medical document#55, rejected carrying out the ARO’ s Decision. She committed Forgery and Frauds, Criminal Code: Forgery 366, 367, 368; Fraud 380.(1); 380.1 (1)(a)(c)(c.1)(e)(f).  She falsified all legal Evidence for the forged document#55. Attached these evidences falsified: Medical Legal Report , X-Ray Report, the WSIB’s 44 document, Medical Assessment Report, Medical Charge Report. 

Scan10029

Scan10030

Scan10031

 

 

 

Plaintiff:

Tieguang Gao

www.disclosedarkforce.com

59 thoughts on “(h). The WSIB C-Manager(4)Badovinac publicly falsified all legal evidences,forged document#55,committed Forgery. Evidences

  1. Hi there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing several weeks of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any solutions to protect against hackers?

  2. I would like to show my thanks to the writer just for bailing me out of this particular problem. Right after exploring throughout the the net and seeing suggestions which were not beneficial, I assumed my life was gone. Living devoid of the answers to the problems you’ve resolved as a result of your article content is a serious case, as well as ones that could have in a negative way damaged my entire career if I had not noticed your site. Your own know-how and kindness in playing with all the pieces was priceless. I’m not sure what I would’ve done if I hadn’t discovered such a point like this. I can also at this moment look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot very much for this reliable and effective help. I won’t hesitate to propose the sites to any person who would like direction about this subject matter.

  3. My spouse and i were now happy when Michael managed to conclude his investigations through the precious recommendations he discovered from your own site. It is now and again perplexing to simply happen to be making a gift of methods that men and women may have been trying to sell. And we also acknowledge we now have the blog owner to thank because of that. The specific illustrations you made, the easy site menu, the friendships you help to instill – it’s got all terrific, and it is aiding our son in addition to us do think that topic is pleasurable, which is certainly truly mandatory. Thanks for everything!

  4. I as well as my guys happened to be reading the excellent tips and hints from your web page and before long developed an awful feeling I had not thanked the site owner for those tips. All the women were consequently warmed to read them and already have without a doubt been taking pleasure in them. Many thanks for getting so helpful and for deciding upon this form of essential useful guides most people are really eager to learn about. My very own sincere apologies for not expressing appreciation to you sooner.

  5. I must express some thanks to you for bailing me out of this particular crisis. Right after scouting throughout the world wide web and obtaining thoughts which are not helpful, I thought my life was gone. Being alive devoid of the approaches to the problems you have solved by means of your main post is a critical case, as well as those which might have in a negative way affected my entire career if I had not come across the website. Your good understanding and kindness in taking care of all the pieces was helpful. I’m not sure what I would’ve done if I had not come upon such a solution like this. I’m able to now look forward to my future. Thanks a lot very much for this expert and results-oriented help. I won’t think twice to suggest your blog to any person who wants and needs tips about this topic.

  6. I would like to convey my gratitude for your kind-heartedness supporting those people who absolutely need guidance on this one area of interest. Your personal commitment to getting the message along came to be surprisingly beneficial and has frequently permitted somebody much like me to reach their dreams. Your personal warm and helpful tips and hints signifies this much a person like me and extremely more to my peers. Best wishes; from each one of us.

  7. I am glad for commenting to make you know of the remarkable discovery our princess went through reading your site. She mastered a lot of things, not to mention what it is like to possess a very effective teaching mood to have others just know just exactly specific extremely tough issues. You undoubtedly did more than visitors’ expectations. Many thanks for churning out these valuable, healthy, edifying and even unique tips on your topic to Jane.

  8. Thank you for each of your hard work on this site. Gloria enjoys working on investigations and it is easy to understand why. A number of us notice all about the dynamic medium you deliver vital techniques on your blog and foster participation from visitors about this topic so our girl is really starting to learn so much. Have fun with the rest of the new year. You are always conducting a dazzling job.

  9. I happen to be commenting to let you know what a perfect experience my girl found studying yuor web blog. She picked up a wide variety of issues, which included how it is like to have an incredible giving style to make the mediocre ones with ease grasp some hard to do matters. You undoubtedly exceeded my desires. Thanks for imparting such interesting, trustworthy, edifying not to mention fun thoughts on this topic to Kate.

  10. I must show my thanks to the writer for rescuing me from this particular dilemma. Because of searching through the world-wide-web and obtaining strategies which were not powerful, I assumed my entire life was over. Existing without the solutions to the issues you have fixed through your short post is a critical case, and ones that could have in a wrong way damaged my career if I hadn’t come across your blog post. The capability and kindness in taking care of every item was valuable. I don’t know what I would have done if I hadn’t discovered such a point like this. I am able to at this point look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot so much for your expert and result oriented guide. I won’t be reluctant to refer your web site to any individual who should receive care about this issue.

  11. I precisely wanted to say thanks all over again. I’m not certain the things I would have sorted out without the suggestions documented by you directly on that concern. Entirely was the frightful scenario in my position, nevertheless taking a look at your skilled approach you dealt with it took me to jump for gladness. I’m happier for your help and then believe you find out what an amazing job you were getting into educating many people all through your web site. I’m certain you haven’t met all of us.

  12. I and also my friends appeared to be looking through the excellent information and facts found on the blog and so unexpectedly got an awful feeling I never thanked you for those techniques. These young boys had been certainly stimulated to see them and have now honestly been using them. We appreciate you actually being indeed thoughtful and also for having this form of beneficial subject areas most people are really wanting to be informed on. Our sincere apologies for not saying thanks to sooner.

  13. I am writing to let you know what a brilliant encounter my princess enjoyed viewing your blog. She picked up numerous details, not to mention how it is like to have a wonderful helping character to let other individuals smoothly know just exactly some tricky subject matter. You truly exceeded visitors’ expected results. Thank you for showing these priceless, trustworthy, revealing and also unique guidance on this topic to Ethel.

  14. I simply had to say thanks again. I am not sure what I would’ve taken care of without these suggestions documented by you directly on that problem. Certainly was the horrifying issue in my opinion, nevertheless taking a look at the very professional style you treated it forced me to weep with fulfillment. I am just thankful for this work and then have high hopes you are aware of a great job you are getting into training others all through your website. More than likely you haven’t encountered all of us.

  15. I really wanted to type a message to thank you for all the lovely advice you are writing at this website. My incredibly long internet lookup has finally been rewarded with excellent details to exchange with my colleagues. I would say that most of us website visitors actually are definitely fortunate to be in a fabulous network with many outstanding people with helpful tips and hints. I feel truly grateful to have used your website and look forward to so many more fun moments reading here. Thank you once more for all the details.

  16. I have to show thanks to you just for rescuing me from this condition. As a result of looking through the internet and finding tips which are not pleasant, I was thinking my life was over. Existing minus the solutions to the issues you have fixed by way of your entire short post is a serious case, as well as ones that might have in a negative way affected my entire career if I hadn’t discovered your web site. The training and kindness in maneuvering every aspect was tremendous. I’m not sure what I would’ve done if I had not encountered such a point like this. It’s possible to at this point look ahead to my future. Thanks so much for the specialized and amazing guide. I won’t think twice to propose your web blog to anybody who wants and needs care on this subject matter.

  17. I have to express appreciation to the writer for bailing me out of this type of incident. After looking out through the search engines and finding principles that were not beneficial, I believed my life was well over. Existing minus the answers to the problems you have solved by way of this blog post is a crucial case, and the ones which could have badly affected my career if I hadn’t encountered the blog. Your know-how and kindness in taking care of all the pieces was very helpful. I don’t know what I would have done if I had not come upon such a thing like this. I’m able to at this time look forward to my future. Thanks a lot very much for your high quality and result oriented help. I will not think twice to suggest your blog post to any person who needs and wants support about this situation.

  18. Thanks for all your valuable labor on this website. Kim loves engaging in internet research and it’s really easy to understand why. We all learn all regarding the powerful means you offer efficient techniques on your web site and as well attract participation from website visitors on that concern then our child is without a doubt discovering a whole lot. Take advantage of the remaining portion of the new year. You’re the one performing a tremendous job.

  19. I want to express my appreciation for your generosity in support of folks that really want help on the theme. Your personal dedication to passing the message all-around appeared to be astonishingly practical and have in every case made women just like me to attain their goals. The interesting hints and tips can mean so much a person like me and substantially more to my fellow workers. Thank you; from everyone of us.

  20. I’m just commenting to let you know what a useful encounter our child gained going through the blog. She mastered a good number of pieces, which included how it is like to have an awesome giving style to let others without difficulty fully grasp chosen hard to do issues. You actually did more than my expectations. I appreciate you for presenting such invaluable, healthy, revealing and also cool tips about your topic to Julie.

  21. Thank you a lot for providing individuals with an exceptionally spectacular possiblity to check tips from this web site. It is often very ideal plus full of a lot of fun for me personally and my office acquaintances to visit your blog more than 3 times every week to see the newest things you will have. And indeed, I’m also usually fulfilled concerning the astounding pointers served by you. Selected 3 ideas in this article are basically the most efficient I’ve ever had.

  22. I precisely wished to thank you very much yet again. I do not know the things I would’ve created in the absence of the entire tips contributed by you concerning such a subject matter. It seemed to be the frightful difficulty in my view, however , looking at this specialized fashion you resolved the issue forced me to cry with delight. I will be grateful for this support and then believe you really know what a powerful job you are carrying out teaching many people using your website. I’m certain you have never come across all of us.

  23. I simply wanted to write down a brief note to be able to thank you for all the marvelous strategies you are giving out at this site. My time-consuming internet lookup has at the end been recognized with reliable know-how to talk about with my neighbours. I ‘d express that we site visitors are really fortunate to be in a great community with so many outstanding professionals with great tricks. I feel very much happy to have encountered the site and look forward to many more fun moments reading here. Thanks once more for all the details.

  24. I wish to show thanks to this writer for rescuing me from this type of trouble. Because of browsing through the world wide web and seeing views which are not helpful, I believed my life was over. Being alive minus the strategies to the problems you have fixed by means of your good short post is a serious case, and the ones which could have badly damaged my career if I had not encountered your website. The ability and kindness in controlling almost everything was helpful. I am not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t come upon such a subject like this. I can at this point look forward to my future. Thanks for your time very much for this expert and results-oriented guide. I won’t think twice to propose your site to anybody who will need recommendations on this situation.

  25. I actually wanted to write down a quick word to thank you for these nice advice you are giving at this website. My considerable internet research has now been recognized with professional facts and strategies to exchange with my two friends. I would declare that most of us readers are quite lucky to be in a great website with many special professionals with interesting advice. I feel quite blessed to have seen your website page and look forward to tons of more fun moments reading here. Thanks a lot again for all the details.

  26. I wish to show some thanks to this writer for rescuing me from such a incident. Right after checking through the online world and getting principles which were not helpful, I was thinking my life was gone. Living without the answers to the difficulties you have fixed all through your good blog post is a serious case, as well as the kind which may have badly affected my career if I had not come across your web page. Your main capability and kindness in maneuvering every part was very helpful. I am not sure what I would’ve done if I had not encountered such a stuff like this. It’s possible to at this time look forward to my future. Thanks for your time very much for your specialized and result oriented guide. I will not be reluctant to suggest your site to any individual who would need guidance on this situation.

  27. Thanks so much for giving everyone such a breathtaking opportunity to read articles and blog posts from this site. It can be so good and jam-packed with amusement for me and my office peers to search your site on the least three times every week to study the fresh tips you have. And definitely, I’m so always motivated concerning the extraordinary pointers served by you. Certain 3 ideas on this page are really the best we have ever had.

  28. Thank you so much for giving everyone an extremely wonderful possiblity to read in detail from this blog. It really is so useful and full of fun for me and my office peers to search the blog at the least thrice in 7 days to study the fresh items you have. And definitely, I’m just usually impressed considering the amazing tricks you give. Selected 4 facts on this page are particularly the most beneficial we have ever had.

  29. Thanks a lot for giving everyone remarkably memorable chance to discover important secrets from this site. It’s always so brilliant and jam-packed with amusement for me and my office mates to search your web site nearly three times every week to learn the newest items you have. Not to mention, I’m also certainly fulfilled concerning the stunning tips and hints served by you. Selected 1 points on this page are rather the most beneficial we’ve ever had.

  30. My husband and i got very fulfilled when Albert managed to carry out his research through the ideas he received while using the web pages. It’s not at all simplistic to just always be giving out steps which usually others could have been trying to sell. Therefore we see we need the website owner to give thanks to because of that. The entire explanations you have made, the easy web site menu, the relationships your site make it possible to promote – it is most great, and it is helping our son in addition to our family reason why this topic is cool, and that’s exceedingly essential. Many thanks for everything!

  31. I would like to voice my appreciation for your kindness for persons who really need guidance on in this matter. Your special dedication to getting the solution all through became especially helpful and have frequently encouraged associates like me to reach their ambitions. Your amazing invaluable key points signifies so much to me and substantially more to my peers. Thanks a ton; from everyone of us.

  32. I needed to draft you the bit of note to be able to say thank you once again considering the marvelous guidelines you have shared here. It was certainly surprisingly open-handed of people like you to provide freely what many people could have sold as an e book to generate some money on their own, chiefly considering the fact that you could have tried it if you considered necessary. These creative ideas also acted like a easy way to comprehend other individuals have the identical interest the same as mine to grasp good deal more with regards to this problem. I’m certain there are millions of more enjoyable periods in the future for many who check out your blog post.

  33. I am also writing to make you be aware of what a helpful discovery our girl gained using the blog. She noticed plenty of issues, most notably what it’s like to have an awesome teaching mindset to have many others effortlessly know precisely specified multifaceted issues. You truly exceeded readers’ expectations. Thank you for rendering those invaluable, safe, educational not to mention unique guidance on this topic to Lizeth.

  34. I wish to show my appreciation to the writer for rescuing me from this type of setting. After checking throughout the internet and finding views which were not powerful, I thought my life was done. Existing devoid of the strategies to the difficulties you’ve solved by way of your good posting is a crucial case, as well as the ones that would have in a negative way affected my career if I hadn’t come across your web site. Your good expertise and kindness in controlling every aspect was valuable. I am not sure what I would have done if I had not come upon such a stuff like this. I can also at this time look forward to my future. Thanks for your time so much for this skilled and amazing help. I won’t be reluctant to propose the website to any individual who needs and wants care about this matter.

  35. I simply wanted to jot down a small remark to say thanks to you for those fabulous guidelines you are placing at this site. My extended internet lookup has at the end of the day been paid with awesome suggestions to talk about with my good friends. I would repeat that we site visitors actually are rather fortunate to exist in a magnificent community with very many perfect professionals with interesting tips and hints. I feel really privileged to have seen your entire weblog and look forward to many more fun times reading here. Thanks once again for a lot of things.

  36. I want to get across my love for your kindness in support of those people who actually need help on this one concept. Your very own dedication to getting the solution all through came to be quite useful and have in every case encouraged those just like me to realize their objectives. Your invaluable key points implies a lot to me and extremely more to my office workers. Many thanks; from each one of us.

  37. I wish to voice my passion for your kindness for folks who really need guidance on in this question. Your special dedication to getting the message all around has been exceptionally advantageous and has continuously encouraged ladies like me to attain their ambitions. Your new useful information signifies a whole lot a person like me and extremely more to my peers. Best wishes; from all of us.

  38. My wife and i ended up being quite delighted Ervin could carry out his basic research via the ideas he was given when using the weblog. It’s not at all simplistic just to choose to be freely giving steps that men and women may have been trying to sell. And now we consider we now have the website owner to give thanks to because of that. All the explanations you have made, the straightforward website navigation, the friendships your site give support to promote – it’s mostly powerful, and it’s assisting our son and us believe that the theme is enjoyable, and that’s truly essential. Thanks for the whole thing!

  39. I want to show my thanks to this writer just for bailing me out of this type of trouble. As a result of searching through the online world and obtaining basics that were not pleasant, I figured my entire life was gone. Living devoid of the approaches to the issues you’ve fixed as a result of your good site is a serious case, and those which may have adversely damaged my career if I hadn’t come across your blog. Your personal knowledge and kindness in taking care of a lot of things was valuable. I don’t know what I would have done if I had not come across such a stuff like this. I can now look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot so much for this skilled and results-oriented help. I won’t be reluctant to endorse the blog to any person who ought to have counselling about this matter.

  40. I simply had to say thanks again. I do not know the things that I could possibly have created without these smart ideas provided by you on my concern. It had become a real horrifying case in my opinion, but discovering the very skilled mode you handled the issue made me to leap for gladness. Now i’m happy for this assistance and in addition hope that you recognize what a powerful job you are always undertaking educating the mediocre ones through the use of your webpage. Most likely you have never come across any of us.

  41. I wanted to write you a very little remark to say thank you again for your personal precious ideas you’ve documented on this website. This has been certainly incredibly open-handed of people like you to allow without restraint all many people could possibly have marketed as an e-book to generate some bucks for themselves, most notably given that you might well have tried it if you ever considered necessary. Those basics in addition acted like a fantastic way to be certain that someone else have similar eagerness just as mine to know more and more when it comes to this matter. I’m sure there are many more enjoyable sessions in the future for people who read your blog post.

  42. I want to point out my respect for your kind-heartedness giving support to folks that should have help with that concept. Your personal dedication to getting the solution around has been really insightful and have continuously allowed employees much like me to get to their desired goals. Your amazing interesting tips and hints implies so much a person like me and a whole lot more to my mates. Thanks a ton; from each one of us.

  43. I must voice my love for your kind-heartedness supporting persons that absolutely need help with your subject. Your real dedication to getting the solution across came to be exceedingly interesting and has all the time made others like me to realize their aims. Your entire helpful publication implies this much a person like me and substantially more to my colleagues. Thanks a ton; from everyone of us.

  44. I and also my friends happened to be going through the good thoughts from your web page then the sudden I had an awful feeling I had not thanked the web blog owner for them. The people were as a consequence very interested to learn all of them and already have sincerely been tapping into these things. We appreciate you indeed being well kind and then for going for such good topics millions of individuals are really desperate to know about. Our honest regret for not expressing gratitude to you earlier.

  45. I must get across my admiration for your generosity giving support to people who require assistance with that topic. Your real dedication to getting the message all through was particularly beneficial and have frequently permitted guys and women like me to realize their desired goals. The warm and friendly useful information indicates a great deal a person like me and still more to my peers. Thanks a lot; from each one of us.

  46. I enjoy you because of all of the effort on this site. Debby delights in managing research and it’s really obvious why. We all learn all of the dynamic tactic you convey very helpful steps by means of this web site and in addition improve response from other individuals on the point plus our own daughter is without question studying a lot of things. Have fun with the rest of the new year. Your conducting a useful job.

  47. I and my guys were actually going through the great guides located on your site then quickly I had a horrible feeling I never thanked the blog owner for those strategies. The men are already absolutely thrilled to read all of them and have seriously been using these things. Appreciation for being considerably considerate and for considering this sort of beneficial useful guides most people are really eager to discover. My personal sincere regret for not expressing gratitude to earlier.

  48. My spouse and i ended up being very excited when John managed to conclude his research through the entire ideas he made using your web page. It’s not at all simplistic to just continually be giving for free tricks which often some people have been selling. Therefore we figure out we now have you to appreciate because of that. These explanations you have made, the straightforward website navigation, the relationships your site help to foster – it’s mostly exceptional, and it’s really leading our son and us know that the idea is exciting, which is exceptionally mandatory. Thank you for everything!

  49. A lot of thanks for your own hard work on this web site. Gloria delights in setting aside time for investigations and it is simple to grasp why. We learn all of the lively tactic you provide very important techniques on this web blog and as well welcome response from visitors on the matter and our favorite child is without a doubt being taught a great deal. Take advantage of the remaining portion of the new year. You’re the one conducting a pretty cool job.

  50. My wife and i have been now thrilled when Emmanuel could deal with his preliminary research out of the precious recommendations he came across when using the site. It’s not at all simplistic to just be offering tactics that many other folks might have been making money from. And we also know we have got the blog owner to be grateful to for that. Those explanations you have made, the straightforward blog menu, the relationships you will give support to promote – it is all amazing, and it is facilitating our son and the family reckon that this concept is interesting, which is certainly particularly fundamental. Many thanks for the whole lot!

  51. I precisely wished to appreciate you once again. I am not sure what I might have achieved in the absence of the entire recommendations shown by you concerning my field. It truly was an absolute scary scenario in my position, however , observing a new skilled way you solved that made me to leap over happiness. I’m happy for your information and thus wish you really know what an amazing job you happen to be undertaking instructing others through a site. Most likely you haven’t come across any of us.

  52. I have to get across my admiration for your kindness for folks that need guidance on this particular concept. Your personal commitment to getting the solution all over appeared to be pretty important and have in most cases empowered guys like me to achieve their goals. Your entire invaluable hints and tips entails so much to me and somewhat more to my office workers. Thanks a ton; from all of us.

  53. I must express my thanks to the writer for rescuing me from this particular circumstance. Just after searching throughout the the web and getting suggestions which were not powerful, I figured my entire life was done. Living without the strategies to the issues you’ve fixed by means of your website is a serious case, and those which might have adversely damaged my entire career if I hadn’t discovered your web page. Your actual skills and kindness in controlling all the pieces was useful. I’m not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t encountered such a solution like this. It’s possible to now relish my future. Thanks so much for your expert and result oriented help. I won’t think twice to recommend your web sites to any individual who should have guide on this issue.

  54. I happen to be commenting to make you understand what a exceptional encounter my friend’s child obtained checking the blog. She came to find several things, with the inclusion of what it is like to have an incredible helping character to make most people without hassle have an understanding of chosen very confusing matters. You really did more than people’s desires. Thank you for offering those warm and friendly, safe, educational as well as unique thoughts on your topic to Tanya.

  55. I precisely desired to appreciate you once again. I am not sure the things that I would have achieved in the absence of these tips and hints discussed by you directly on this industry. This was a real depressing scenario in my view, however , observing your skilled technique you treated that made me to weep with delight. Extremely thankful for your work and thus have high hopes you realize what a great job you are doing training many others using your webblog. I know that you have never encountered all of us.

  56. I would like to get across my appreciation for your generosity giving support to men and women that should have assistance with this one subject matter. Your special dedication to getting the solution throughout appears to be really beneficial and have continually empowered guys and women like me to attain their desired goals. Your new important tutorial entails much to me and still more to my colleagues. Many thanks; from each one of us.

Leave a Reply